DINESH KUMARVsPRIYANKA

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CNR No. DLET01-004531-2025
CA 228/2025
DINESH KUMAR Vs. PRIYANKA
01.09.2026
File received back from Delhi Mediation Centre as
unsettled.
Present:- Sh. Satish Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for appellant
(through VC).
Sh. Shivam, learned counsel for respondent (fresh V/N
filed).
It is stated by Sh. Anil Kumar, Advocate, that since
respondent has engaged a new counsel in the present matter, he may
be discharged from this case.
Heard.
In view of the same, Sh. Anil Kumar, Advocate, is
discharged from the present case.
Learned counsel for respondent has filed additional
documents by way of an application. Same is taken on record.
Let copy of the same be supplied to opposite party.
Learned counsel for appellant seeks time to address the
arguments.
Learned counsel for respondent also seeks time on the
ground that he has recently been engaged in the present matter.
Heard. File perused.
At joint request, list the matter on 14.10.2026 for
arguments.
Till NDOH, no coercive steps be taken against the
appellant in pending execution proceedings.
(Babita Puniya)
ASJ-03, East District
KKD Courts, Delhi: 01.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CNR No. DLET01-004531-2025
CA 228/2025
DINESH KUMAR Vs. PRIYANKA
01.09.2026
File received back from Delhi Mediation Centre as
unsettled.
Present:- Sh. Satish Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for appellant
(through VC).
Sh. Shivam, learned counsel for respondent (fresh V/N
filed).
It is stated by Sh. Anil Kumar, Advocate, that since
respondent has engaged a new counsel in the present matter, he may
be discharged from this case.
Heard.
In view of the same, Sh. Anil Kumar, Advocate, is
discharged from the present case.
Learned counsel for respondent has filed additional
documents by way of an application. Same is taken on record.
Let copy of the same be supplied to opposite party.
Learned counsel for appellant seeks time to address the
arguments.
Learned counsel for respondent also seeks time on the
ground that he has recently been engaged in the present matter.
Heard. File perused.
At joint request, list the matter on 14.10.2026 for
arguments.
Till NDOH, no coercive steps be taken against the
appellant in pending execution proceedings.
(Babita Puniya)
ASJ-03, East District
KKD Courts, Delhi: 01.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 228/2025
Dinesh Kumar Vs Priyanka
16.01.2026
File is taken up on an application seeking restoration of stay on
operation of impugned order dated 26.07.2025 moved on behalf of
appellant, through Ld. Counsel.
Pr:- Sh. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the appellant/
applicant.
Issue notice of the present application to the respondent for date
already fixed i.e. 09.02.2026. Till then, no coercive action be taken
against the appellant.
Copy of order be given ‘dasti’ to the appellant.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04/East/KKD:
Delhi : 16.01.2026m
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 228/2025
Dinesh Kumar Vs Priyanka
16.01.2026
File is taken up on an application seeking restoration of stay on
operation of impugned order dated 26.07.2025 moved on behalf of
appellant, through Ld. Counsel.
Pr:- Sh. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the appellant/
applicant.
Issue notice of the present application to the respondent for date
already fixed i.e. 09.02.2026. Till then, no coercive action be taken
against the appellant.
Copy of order be given ‘dasti’ to the appellant.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04/East/KKD:
Delhi : 16.01.2026m
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 228/2025
Dinesh Kumar Vs Priyanka
03.11.2025.
Pr:- Appellant in person with Ld. Counsels Sh. Mohit Dwivedi and
Sh. Bhupender Singh.
Respondent in person along with Ld. Counsel Sh. Anil Kumar
(Fresh Vakalatnama filed).
Some time is sought on behalf of respondent to file reply.
Perusal of the record shows that operation of impugned order
dated 26.07.2025 was stayed by this court subject to payment of Rs.
9,000/- per month by the appellant to the respondent as interim
maintenance.
It is though fairly conceded by the appellant that he could not
arrange the payment of said interim maintenance despite best efforts.
In these circumstances, the stay granted on operation of
impugned order dated 26.07.2025 by this Court stands vacated.
Put up for filing of reply, if any/ arguments on 09.02.2026.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04/East/KKD:
Delhi : 03.11.2025m
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 228/2025
Dinesh Kumar Vs Priyanka
03.11.2025.
Pr:- Appellant in person with Ld. Counsels Sh. Mohit Dwivedi and
Sh. Bhupender Singh.
Respondent in person along with Ld. Counsel Sh. Anil Kumar
(Fresh Vakalatnama filed).
Some time is sought on behalf of respondent to file reply.
Perusal of the record shows that operation of impugned order
dated 26.07.2025 was stayed by this court subject to payment of Rs.
9,000/- per month by the appellant to the respondent as interim
maintenance.
It is though fairly conceded by the appellant that he could not
arrange the payment of said interim maintenance despite best efforts.
In these circumstances, the stay granted on operation of
impugned order dated 26.07.2025 by this Court stands vacated.
Put up for filing of reply, if any/ arguments on 09.02.2026.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04/East/KKD:
Delhi : 03.11.2025m
-- 1 of 1 --