Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 13

CNR DLET01003493202516 Feb 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 13 · 16 Feb 2026 · CNR DLET010034932025

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 SC No. 543/2025
State Vs. Gopal Chauhan
FIR No. 264/2024
PS: Crime Branch-East Delhi
16.02.2026
Present : Sh. Ramesh Bajiya, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Accused persons Jordan (appearing through VC) and
Paula are present on bail through VC.
Accused Gopal Chauhan and accused Zelmis are not
produced from JC because of on going AI Summit in
accordance with the circular bearing number
1198/DHC/Gaz.IIB/G-8/DM/2026 dated 13.02.2026.
It is submitted on behalf of the Ld. Counsels for the
accused persons that the Forensic Science Laboratory report qua
the mobile phones/ chats in question has still not been filed. It is
submitted that before completing the arguments on charge
aforesaid report qua the alleged chats is very much relevant. Not
opposed to by the Ld. Addl. PP. It is therefore requested by Ld.
Counsels for the accused Goapl Chauhan, Zelmis and Paula that
they seek one more opportunity to complete the arguments on
charge as well as to file the written submissions. In the interest of
justice, one last opportunity is granted to the Ld. Counsels for the
accused persons for completing the arguments on charge. In the
meantime, let the notice be issued to the concerned SHO to file
the complete report after calling the same from the concerned
Forensic Science Laboratory. Let priority letter be also issued to
the concerned Director in that regard. In these circumstances, put
up for arguments on charge on 22.04.2026. Shortest available date
is being given. This is a special court dealing with the NDPS
Cases and has pendency of more than 500 Sessions Triable Cases.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the accused Paula as
well as Ld. Counsel for accused Zelmis has requested that their
-- 1 of 2 --
respective applications for the defreezing of the account and the
application under Section 94 BNSS be taken up in the meantime.
It is observed that on the earlier date of hearing investigating
officer was directed to appear before the court to make
clarifications with respect to the accounts in question which have
been freezed but as he was not present bailable warrants qua him
were issued on the last date. Today, his bailable warrants were not
received back but an exemption that he has to appear before
another court which is not understandable. In these circumstance
issue fresh bailable bailable warrants qua the investigating officer
in terms of previous order to be executed through the concerned
DCP. It is impressed upon the concerned IO that he is required to
furnish the exact details with respect to the accounts freezed by
him so that the application of the concerned applicant be disposed
off at the earliest. Put up for consideration/ disposal of both these
applications on 03.03.2026.
(Manu Vedwan)
Additional Sessions Judge-02/
Special Judge (NDPS)
East/Karkardooma/Delhi/16.02.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.