Full Order Text
Final Order 4 · 22 Apr 2026 · CNR DLET010031892025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: SC 476/2025 STATE (BSES) VS. KAPIL SHARMA FIR No.321/2024 PS HARASH VIHAR 22.04.2026 Present: Sh.Gaurav Singh, Ld. Addl. PP for the State. Sh. Mukesh Sharma, AR for the Complainant. Sh.Neeraj, Ld. Counsel for accused. Both accused in person. Ld. Counsel for accused persons concedes for giving notice to accused persons. Even otherwise, on the basis of allegation as contained in the complaint coupled with the evidence and material collected during investigation of this case, prima facie, there is sufficient ground to frame notice for the offence punishable U/s 135/138 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against both the accused persons. Accordingly, notice is framed, to which they pleaded guilty. Accused persons stated that they are pleading guilty voluntarily and understand the consequences of doing so. Accused persons are represented by Counsel who has also explained the legal consequences and ramifications of their pleading guilty. It is also submitted that impugned theft bill has already been settled and settlement amount has already been deposited with complainant company. It is submitted that lenient view in this respect may kindly be taken. Heard. Considered. As accused persons have voluntarily pleaded guilty, accused is convicted for the commission of offence punishable U/s 135 of Electricity Act. Arguments heard on the point of sentence. ORDER ON SENTENCE Ld. Addl. PP for the State submitted that at the time of -- 1 of 2 -- inspection, no electricity meter was found installed in the inspected premises of convict and they were found indulged in direct theft of electricity. Thus, it is prayed that convict may be awarded with the punishment as per the provisions of Electricity Act. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel that convicts are aged about 46 years and 42 years respectively and they are doing the small business. It is also submitted that civil liability qua impugned theft bill have already been settled. It is their first offence and no other case is pending against the convicts. It is prayed that a lenient view may kindly be taken and State expenses may be waived off. Submissions heard. Convicts have no criminal antecedents. They have already settled the matter qua civil liability. Maximum Imprisonment of offence for which convicts have been held guilty is of three years or fine or both. Institutional incarceration would do more harm than good to them. Convicts belongs to humble family and the fact that convicts have already obtained NOC, it would be in the interest of justice that a lenient view is taken against convicts. Considering facts and circumstances the case, age of the convicts, nature of offence and financial condition, convicts namely Kapil Sharma and Sarfaraz Khan are sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of the court u/s 135 of Electricity Act and also directed to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each in DLSA East, KKD Courts, Delhi. Amount deposited. Receipt has been filed. A copy of this order be given to the convict free of cost. File be consigned to the Record Room. (ASHISH RASTOGI) ASJ-05(Electricity)/East Karkardooma Courts Delhi /22.04.2026 -- 2 of 2 --
