Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 18 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma DLET010026272024 10.09.2026 Pr. Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Sachin Sangwan, Ld. Counsel for the defendant. An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is pending adjudication. Perusal of record reveals that the plaintiff has valued the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction at Rs.5,50,000/ and thereafter has again valued the suit for the relief of declaration at Rs.200/ and for the relief…
SHILPI JAINVsRajni Sharma
TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 254/2024
- Registration Date
- 08 May 2024
- Next Hearing Date
- 27 Oct 2026
- Case Stage
- Misc. Arguments
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 09-05-2024 Business: Notice Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2024 Date: 20-08-2024 Business: Ld. PO is on leave today. Put up for the same purpose. Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 11-11-2024 Date: 11-11-2024 Business: reply Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2025 Date: 12-02-2025 Business: Put up for argument on the application u/o 7 Rule 11 Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2025 Date: 12-02-2025 Business: Put up for argument on the application u/o 7 Rule 11 Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2025 Date: 22-07-2025 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDING Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 11-11-2025 Date: 11-11-2025 Business: Ld p o is on leave Further proceeding Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 31-01-2026 Date: 31-01-2026 Business: misc. arguments Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2026 Date: 01-04-2026 Business: for argument on the application. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2026 Date: 02-06-2026 Business: for arguments on the application. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2026 Date: 13-08-2026 Business: for arguments on the application Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 10-09-2026 Date: 10-09-2026 Business: for arguments. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 1161/2024 Filing Date: 08-05-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230008696C202400009 eFiling Date: 08-05-2024 First Hearing Date: 09th May 2024 Court Number And Judge: 482-District Judge-02
Orders
16Interim Order 713 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma CNR No. DLET010026272024 13.08.2026 Pr. Sh. Ankit Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Ms. Nimisha Tripathi, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant through VC. It is submitted on behalf of defendant that the main counsel will attend the court proceedings around 12.00 Noon. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he has a matter listed in Tis Hazari Courts at 12:30PM. In these circumstances, the matter is adjourned. Renotify the matter for arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on 10.09.2026 at 12:00 Noon. At request of Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff, Ld. Counsel for defendant is requested to join the proceedings physically on the date fixed. (SHUCHI LALER) District Judge02 (East), Karkardooma Courts/13.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 602 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 26 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 02.06.2026 Present: Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. counsel for the Plaintiff (through VC). Ms. Janhiv Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant (through VC). Ld. Proxy counsel for defendant submits that the main counsel will attend the proceedings at 12.00 Noon. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he is unable to wait till 12.00 Noon. Matter is adjourned. Renotify the matter for arguments on application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC 13.08.2026. (SHUCHI LALER) District Judge-02 (East), Karkardooma Courts/ 02.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 501 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 01.04.2026 Pr. Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Janvi Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant. Reply filed by the plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that the plaintiff has already filed the reply on 14.05.2025. Same is not on record. Even in the ordersheets, it is not mentioned that the reply has been filed. He shall check it up with the Ahlmad and get the same placed on record. Ahlmad is directed to register the application under order VII Rule 11 CPC separately. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the NDOH with advance copy to opposite side. Renotify the matter for arguments on the application under order VII Rule 11 CPC on 02.06.2026. (SHUCHI LALER) District Judge02 (East), Karkardooma Courts/01.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 431 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 21 CS/254/2024 Shilpi Jain versus Rajni Sharma 31.01.2026 Pr. Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Sachin Sangwal, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC. The matter is at the stage of arguments on application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Reply of defendants is not on record. Even in the ordersheets, it is nowhere mentioned that the reply has been filed. Reply, if any be filed within two weeks with advance copy to opposite side. Rejoinder is already on record. Renotify the matter for arguments on application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, on 01.04.2026. (SHUCHI LALER) District Judge-02 (East), Karkardooma Courts/ 31.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 312 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 2 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 12.02.2025 Present : Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through V.C. Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through V.C. It, appears, that a court fees of Rs.500/- only has been af- fixed on the plaint. Parties jointly seek time to argue on the application U/o 7 rule 11 CPC, on 22.07.2025. Rejoinder/replication, if any, may be filed with copy to other side in advance and against receipt. Deficiency of the court fees, if any, be made up, immedi- ately. (Sanatan Prasad) District Judge-02 (East) Karkardooma Courts/Delhi/12.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 4CS254/24Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 11.11.2024 Present : Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through V.C. Sh. Raju Thakur, Ld. Counsel with Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel through V.C., for the defendant. Sh. Gupta wants to submit replication during the course of the day with spare copy and defendant wants to submit application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC and will supply copy to the plaintiff. Let the copy be sup-…
Interim Order 109 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 10 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 09.05.2024 2.06pm Present : Ms. Shikha Jain, Ld. Counsel with the plaintiff. This is an efiling. Physical file received. It be checked and registered. Heard. The plaintiff has to explain as to how the suit has been valued for the purposes of jurisdiction at Rs.5,50,000/. Let notice of suit and application, be issued to the defen dant/(s) on PF/RC, copies, dasti, also address form in terms of provi sions of Order 6 rule 14A CPC, for 20.08.2024. Steps within a month. (Sanatan Prasad) District Judge02 (East) Karkardooma Courts/Delhi/09.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 18 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma DLET010026272024 10.09.2026 Pr. Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Sachin Sangwan, Ld. Counsel for the defendant. An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is pending adjudication. Perusal of record reveals that the plaintiff has valued the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction at Rs.5,50,000/ and thereafter has again valued the suit for the relief of declaration at Rs.200/ and for the relief…
Order 713 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma CNR No. DLET010026272024 13.08.2026 Pr. Sh. Ankit Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Ms. Nimisha Tripathi, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant through VC. It is submitted on behalf of defendant that the main counsel will attend the court proceedings around 12.00 Noon. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he has a matter listed in Tis Hazari Courts at 12:30PM. In these circumstances, the matter is adjourned. Renotify the matter for arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on 10.09.2026 at 12:00 Noon. At request of Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff, Ld. Counsel for defendant is requested to join the proceedings physically on the date fixed. (SHUCHI LALER) District Judge02 (East), Karkardooma Courts/13.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 602 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 26 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 02.06.2026 Present: Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. counsel for the Plaintiff (through VC). Ms. Janhiv Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant (through VC). Ld. Proxy counsel for defendant submits that the main counsel will attend the proceedings at 12.00 Noon. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he is unable to wait till 12.00 Noon. Matter is adjourned. Renotify the matter for arguments on application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC 13.08.2026. (SHUCHI LALER) District Judge-02 (East), Karkardooma Courts/ 02.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 501 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 01.04.2026 Pr. Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Janvi Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant. Reply filed by the plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that the plaintiff has already filed the reply on 14.05.2025. Same is not on record. Even in the ordersheets, it is not mentioned that the reply has been filed. He shall check it up with the Ahlmad and get the same placed on record. Ahlmad is directed to register the application under order VII Rule 11 CPC separately. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the NDOH with advance copy to opposite side. Renotify the matter for arguments on the application under order VII Rule 11 CPC on 02.06.2026. (SHUCHI LALER) District Judge02 (East), Karkardooma Courts/01.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 431 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 21 CS/254/2024 Shilpi Jain versus Rajni Sharma 31.01.2026 Pr. Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Sachin Sangwal, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC. The matter is at the stage of arguments on application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Reply of defendants is not on record. Even in the ordersheets, it is nowhere mentioned that the reply has been filed. Reply, if any be filed within two weeks with advance copy to opposite side. Rejoinder is already on record. Renotify the matter for arguments on application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, on 01.04.2026. (SHUCHI LALER) District Judge-02 (East), Karkardooma Courts/ 31.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 312 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 2 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 12.02.2025 Present : Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through V.C. Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through V.C. It, appears, that a court fees of Rs.500/- only has been af- fixed on the plaint. Parties jointly seek time to argue on the application U/o 7 rule 11 CPC, on 22.07.2025. Rejoinder/replication, if any, may be filed with copy to other side in advance and against receipt. Deficiency of the court fees, if any, be made up, immedi- ately. (Sanatan Prasad) District Judge-02 (East) Karkardooma Courts/Delhi/12.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 4CS254/24Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 11.11.2024 Present : Sh. Ankur Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through V.C. Sh. Raju Thakur, Ld. Counsel with Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel through V.C., for the defendant. Sh. Gupta wants to submit replication during the course of the day with spare copy and defendant wants to submit application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC and will supply copy to the plaintiff. Let the copy be sup-…
Order 109 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 10 CS 254/24 Shilpi Jain Vs. Rajni Sharma 09.05.2024 2.06pm Present : Ms. Shikha Jain, Ld. Counsel with the plaintiff. This is an efiling. Physical file received. It be checked and registered. Heard. The plaintiff has to explain as to how the suit has been valued for the purposes of jurisdiction at Rs.5,50,000/. Let notice of suit and application, be issued to the defen dant/(s) on PF/RC, copies, dasti, also address form in terms of provi sions of Order 6 rule 14A CPC, for 20.08.2024. Steps within a month. (Sanatan Prasad) District Judge02 (East) Karkardooma Courts/Delhi/09.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
