Raj Kumar KapilVsm/s antram fisheries

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No.127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. M/s Antram Fisheries
CNR No. DLET010022362024
03.09.2026
Present: Mr. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
PW3 Sh. Yogesh from Office of Deputy Excise & Taxation is
present, examined and discharged. However, nil opportunity availed for
cross examination of PW3.
PW Sh. Sunil, Superintendent from CGST, East
Commissionate Division, Mayur Vihar is also present but has not brought
summoned record. PW Mr. Sachin, Inspector from Central GST, Sonepat,
Haryana is also present with summoned record. However, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff has submitted that he wants to drop both witnesses as sufficient
witnesses have already been examined to prove his case. Accordingly, both
witnesses discharged unexamined. Diet money of Rs. 1,000/- (each) paid to
PW3 and PW Mr. Sachin and Rs. 500/- paid to PW Sh. Sunil.
No other PW is to be examined as stated by Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff, hence PE closed.
Since defence of the defendant has already struck off,
accordingly DE also closed.
Put up for final arguments on 16.10.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
03.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram Fisheries
06.08.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for applicant/plaintiff
(through VC).
File taken up today on an application U/o 16 Rule 1 CPC for
taking on record the list of witnesses and application U/o 16 Rule 1 read
with section 151 CPC moved on behalf of plaintiff for summoning of
remaining witnesses.
Heard.
Additional list of witnesses be taken on record.
Let the witnesses mentioned in the application and as per list
of witnesses be summoned on filing of PF for the date already fixed. Diet
money shall be payable on the spot. Both applications are disposed.
Put up on the date already fixed i.e. 03.09.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
06.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
29.07.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Process issued to the witnesses from the GST department and
from RS Acquaculture Transport received back unserved.
PW1 Shri Raj Kumar Kapil is present, cross examined and
discharged.
PW4 Shri Saddam Hussain is present, examined and
discharged. Diet money of Rs. 500/- paid to witness.
On last date of hearing Shri Raj Kumar Kapil was examined
inadvertently as PW3, this error is rectified and he be read as PW1.
Remaining PWs be summoned again on filing of PF within 7
days. Diet money shall be payable at the spot.
Put up for PE on 03.09.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
29.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
06.07.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Amit Poonia, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 1 to 4.
PW3 Shri Raj Kumar Kapil partly cross examined and his
further cross examination is deferred on the request of defendant as he has to
go to Tis Hazari urgently.
Put up for further cross examination of PW3 and remaining PE
on 29.07.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
06.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No. 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram fisheries
18.05.2026
Present: Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Plaintiff in person.
Mr. Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
PW2 Sh. Ashish Roshan from State Bank of India and PW3
Sh. Yogesh from GST Department are present and have brought the
summoned record, but Ld. Counsels for both parties have connected through
VC and have submitted that they have no objection, if they may be
examined by this court as today advocates are on strike. Accordingly, both
the witnesses are examined and discharged. Diet money of Rs. 700/- to
PW2 and Rs. 1000/- to PW3 paid respectively.
As per report of Ahlmad, process issued to other witnesses
from M/s Saddam Tempo Service, Mr. Ravinder Pahal, Proprietor of M/s R.
Aquaculture Transporter and GST Department, Delhi not received back.
Let the witnesses be summoned on PF and diet money shall be
payable at the spot.
Put up for remaining PE on 06.07.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
18.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
13.04.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Himanshu, proxy counsel for defendant (through VC).
PW1 Shri Raj Kumar Kapil has tendered his evidence by way
of affidavit in examination in chief, but proxy counsel for defendant sought
adjournment as main counsel is not well. The conduct of the defendant is
not upto mark on record accordingly, cost of Rs. 10,000/- is imposed on
defendant. Cross examination of PW1 is deferred for the next date of
hearing.
Plaintiff has filed an application U/o 16 Rule 1 CPC for
summoning of witness as per list of witnesses. Let witnesses be summoned
on filing of PF for the next date of hearing. Diet money shall be payable at
the spot.
Put up for cross examination of PW1 and remaining PE on
18.05.2026. PW1 Shri Raj Kumar Kapil is directed to remain present on the
next date of hearing.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
13.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No.127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram Fisheries
10.03.2026
Present: Mr. Deepak Saini, proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Mr. Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
No PW is present.
Adjournment sought on the ground that main counsel is not
available, due to function in his family.
Heard.
Though no explanation tendered as to why advance copy of
affidavit has not been supplied, yet in the interest of justice, adjournment
granted.
Put up for PE on 13.04.2026. Advance copy of affidavit be
supplied to opposite party atleast one week prior to next date of hearing. It is
being made clear that no adjournment on next date of hearing shall be
granted to both parties in any condition whatsoever.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
10.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No. 376/23
Richcredit Finance P. Ltd. Vs. Harpreet Singh
11.02.2026
Present: Shri Dipanshu Meena, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Maninder Jeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 1
and 2.
Arguments on application under Order 11 Rule 1 (4) of
Commercial Courts Act heard.
Put up for order on abovesaid application at 4.00 PM.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
11.02.2026
At 4.00 PM
Present: None.
Vide my separate order, application under Order 11 Rule 1 (4)
of Commercial Courts Act has been allowed, subject to cost of Rs. 10,000/-
to be paid to the defendants.
Put up for DE on 24.03.2026. Advance copy of affidavit be
supplied to opposite party atleast one week prior to next date of hearing.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
11.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
22.01.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Shri Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
No time left.
Put up for order on 11.02.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge
(Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
22.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No. 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram fisheries
08.01.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Shri Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
Arguments heard on the applicaton U/o 13A CPC.
Put up for order on 22.1.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
08.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No.127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram fisheries
19.11.2025
Present: Mr. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Mr. Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
Case is fixed for reply and arguments on application under
Order XIIIA read with Order VIII Rule 3A & 5 of CPC, but Ld. Counsels
for both parties have connected through VC and have submitted that
there may be chances of settlement between the parties and this matter
may be referred to Mediation Cell.
At joint request, this case is referred to Mediation Cell on
26.11.2025 at 2.00 PM.
Put up for further proceedings on 12.12.2025. Both the
parties are directed to sign referral letter of mediation today itself only
then this matter may be referred to Mediation.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi /19.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
27.10.2025
Present: Ms. Aayushi Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
(through VC)
Shri Amit Poonia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through
VC).
No PW is present but plaintiff has filed one application
U/o XIII-A read with order VIII Rules 3A & 5 CPC. Copy supplied.
Defendant to file reply to the said application by the next date of
hearing.
Put up for 19.11.2025 for reply and for arguments on
the above said application.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi /27.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
08.09.2025
Present: Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Plaintiff has filed an application seeking striking off the
defence of the defendants No. 1 to 4. Copy stated to have supplied.
However, application is not having court fee and same be fixed by
the next date of hearing positively. Let reply to this application be
filed by next date of hearing with advance copy to opposite party.
Put up for reply and arguments on 22.09.2025.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi
08.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No. 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. M/s Antram Fisheries
23.08.2025
Present: Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
None for defendant.
Proxy counsel for plaintiff has connected through VC and
has submitted that plaintiff has filed one application for seeking striking
of defence of defendant through online, whereas physical copy is yet to
be filed. On the other hand, none is connected on behalf of defendant.
Today advocates are on strike, due to no adverse order is
being passed.
Put up for further proceedings on 08.09.2025.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi /23.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil
Vs. m/s antram fisheries
30.07.2025
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Shri Amit Punia – Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Case is fixed for admission-denial of documents whereas
defendant has not filed any affidavit of admission-denial of documents
despite various opportunities. However, Ld. Counsel for defendant has
argued that claim of plaintiff has already been satisfied qua defendant no.
1 whereas defendant no. 5 has already been deleted and remaining claim
is qua defendant no. 5 only.
On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that
defendant has failed to file affidavit of admission-denial of documents
and now defence of the defendant is liable to be struck off and WS is to
be kept off the record.
Time sought for filing appropriate application. Granted.
Put up on 23.08.2025.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi
30.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. M/s Antram Fisheries
07.07.2025
Present: Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
In the last order sheet, it is recorded that preliminary
objections filed by plaintiff, whereas no such separate preliminary
objections filed. Accordingly, previous ordersheet rectified.
Defendant has not supplied copy of affidavit of
admission/denial of documents to plaintiff. Be supplied within three days
positively.
On last date of hearing, both the parties were directed to
remain present for admission / denial of documents, but today advocates
are on strike.
Both the parties are again directed to comply with previous
order for 30.07.2025.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi
07.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
04.06.2025
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Amit Punia Ld. Counsel for defendant on VC.
Replication along with affidavit of admission/denial
filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy to opposite party be supplied
within three days.
Preliminary objections filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Copies be supplied within three days.
Defendant also stated to have filed similar affidavit.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has submitted that he has not received the
copies of affidavit. Be supplied within three days against due
acknowledgment.
Put up on 07.07.2025 for admission/denial of
documents.
Both the parties shall remain present for
admission/denial of documents.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi
04.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
24.04.2025
Present: Sh. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Amit Puniya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he is not
pressing his application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC as well
as under Order XI Rule 1 of CPC. He prayed that both these
applications may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the submissions made by Ld. Counsel of
plaintiff, the applications filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC as well
as under Order XI Rule 1 of CPC are dismissed as not pressed.
One opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to file
replication, before the next date of hearing.
Re-notify for filing Replication, Affidavit of Admission /
Denial, if any as well as for framing of issues on 17.05.2025.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-24.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. M/s Antram Fisheries
17.03.2025
Present: Sh. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Harsh Bhardwaj, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
defendant, joined through V.C.
Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant submits that the
main counsel has noted the next date of hearing as 27.03.2025, due to
which, he is not available today.
Reply to the application has also not been filed.
One last opportunity is granted to the defendant to file
reply before the next date of hearing.
Re-notify for filing reply and disposal of all the pending
applications on 29.03.2025.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-17.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
28.02.2025
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for plaintiff joined
through VC.
Shri Amit Punia – Ld. Counsel for defendant joined
through VC.
Defendant has not filed reply to the application under Order 6
Rule 17 CPC and under Order 11 Rule 1(5) CPC. One last opportunity
is granted.
Put up for filing reply and disposal of both the applications on
17.03.2025.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-28.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
03.02.2025
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for plaintiff joined
through VC.
Shri Amit Puniya – Ld. Counsel for defendant joined
through VC.
Plaintiff has filed two applications, one under order 6 Rule 17
CPC and another under Order 11 Rule 1(5) CPC, copy of which has
already been supplied to Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Defendant is directed to file reply to both these applications
before the next date.
Put up for filing reply and disposal of these applications on
28.02.2025.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-03.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
04.11.2024
Present: Proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Defendant has not filed reply to the application even has not
collected the copy from the record. One last and final opportunity is
granted to the defendant to file reply, failing which necessary orders
shall be passed.
Put up for filing reply and disposal of application on
13.11.2024.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-04.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
07.10.2024
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed an application under Order 6
Rule 17 CPC alongwith amended plaint and statement of truth. Copies
have been placed on record.
Defendant is directed to file reply to the application before the
next date of hearing.
Put up for filing reply and for disposal of the application on
04.11.2024.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-07.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
21.09.2024
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Shri Harsh Bhardwaj – Ld. Counsel for all the
defendants joined through VC.
Plaintiff has not filed replication and affidavit of admission-
denial of documents. One last opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to
file the same.
Put up for filing replication, affidavit of admission-denial of
documents and framing of issues on 07.10.2024.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-21.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
29.08.2024
Present: Shri Manish Dua – Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Shri Amit Poonia – Ld. Counsel for all the defendants.
Ld. Counsel for defendants has filed written statement
alongwith statement of truth and vakalatnama through online mode as
well as physical mode, copy of which has already been filed.
The plaintiff shall file replication if any before the next date of
hearing.
Put up for filing replication, affidavit of admission-denial of
documents, framing of issues as well as case management hearing on
21.09.2024.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-29.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
03.08.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Amit Poonia, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2.
None for defendant no. 1, 3 & 4.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed speed/registered
postal receipts alongwith respective track reports.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2 has filed an application
u/s 151 CPC on the ground that some pages of the plaint are not
legible. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submit that he will supply the
deficient/legible copy of the respective pages to Ld. Counsel for the
defendant no. 2 within two days. Application stands disposed of
accordingly.
Put up on 29.08.2024 at 02:00 PM.
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-03.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
02.07.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed amended memo of
parties thereby deleting the defendant no. 5 & 6 from memo of parties.
Statement of Truth as well as non-starter report from
DLSA is on record.
Let summons for settlement of issues be issued to the
defendants on filing of PF, RC, speed post, copies, etc. for
03.08.2024. PF be filed within one week.
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-02.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil vs M/s Antram Fisheries Pvt. Ltd.
08.05.2024
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he will be deleting
defendants no. 5 & 6 from the array of parties and will be filing
appropriate application in this regard alongwith amended memo of
parties.
Put up on 02.07.2024.
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-08.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs.
m/s antram fisheries
27.04.2024
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
It is noted that plaintiff has impleaded the Directors of defendant no.
1 company as defendants no. 2 to 5 and has made a partnership firm as
defendant no. 6.
Heard.
Put up for consideration on 08.05.2024 (02.00 pm).
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-27.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS(Comm) 127/2024
Raj Kumar Kapil vs M/s Antram Fisheries
20.04.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through
VC.
Put up for consideration on 27.04.2024.
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-20.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram Fisheries
CNR No. DLET010022362024
16.10.2026
Present: Mr. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Mr. Amit Poonia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
Case is fixed for final arguments, but adjournment sought on
behalf of plaintiff on the ground that certified copies of documents have
been received yesterday only. Granted.
Put up for final arguments on 02.12.2026. Meanwhile, both the
parties are at liberty to file written synopsis thereby exchanging copies to
each other.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
16.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No.127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. M/s Antram Fisheries
CNR No. DLET010022362024
03.09.2026
Present: Mr. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
PW3 Sh. Yogesh from Office of Deputy Excise & Taxation is
present, examined and discharged. However, nil opportunity availed for
cross examination of PW3.
PW Sh. Sunil, Superintendent from CGST, East
Commissionate Division, Mayur Vihar is also present but has not brought
summoned record. PW Mr. Sachin, Inspector from Central GST, Sonepat,
Haryana is also present with summoned record. However, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff has submitted that he wants to drop both witnesses as sufficient
witnesses have already been examined to prove his case. Accordingly, both
witnesses discharged unexamined. Diet money of Rs. 1,000/- (each) paid to
PW3 and PW Mr. Sachin and Rs. 500/- paid to PW Sh. Sunil.
No other PW is to be examined as stated by Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff, hence PE closed.
Since defence of the defendant has already struck off,
accordingly DE also closed.
Put up for final arguments on 16.10.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
03.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram Fisheries
06.08.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for applicant/plaintiff
(through VC).
File taken up today on an application U/o 16 Rule 1 CPC for
taking on record the list of witnesses and application U/o 16 Rule 1 read
with section 151 CPC moved on behalf of plaintiff for summoning of
remaining witnesses.
Heard.
Additional list of witnesses be taken on record.
Let the witnesses mentioned in the application and as per list
of witnesses be summoned on filing of PF for the date already fixed. Diet
money shall be payable on the spot. Both applications are disposed.
Put up on the date already fixed i.e. 03.09.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
06.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
29.07.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Process issued to the witnesses from the GST department and
from RS Acquaculture Transport received back unserved.
PW1 Shri Raj Kumar Kapil is present, cross examined and
discharged.
PW4 Shri Saddam Hussain is present, examined and
discharged. Diet money of Rs. 500/- paid to witness.
On last date of hearing Shri Raj Kumar Kapil was examined
inadvertently as PW3, this error is rectified and he be read as PW1.
Remaining PWs be summoned again on filing of PF within 7
days. Diet money shall be payable at the spot.
Put up for PE on 03.09.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
29.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
06.07.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Amit Poonia, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 1 to 4.
PW3 Shri Raj Kumar Kapil partly cross examined and his
further cross examination is deferred on the request of defendant as he has to
go to Tis Hazari urgently.
Put up for further cross examination of PW3 and remaining PE
on 29.07.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
06.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No. 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram fisheries
18.05.2026
Present: Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Plaintiff in person.
Mr. Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
PW2 Sh. Ashish Roshan from State Bank of India and PW3
Sh. Yogesh from GST Department are present and have brought the
summoned record, but Ld. Counsels for both parties have connected through
VC and have submitted that they have no objection, if they may be
examined by this court as today advocates are on strike. Accordingly, both
the witnesses are examined and discharged. Diet money of Rs. 700/- to
PW2 and Rs. 1000/- to PW3 paid respectively.
As per report of Ahlmad, process issued to other witnesses
from M/s Saddam Tempo Service, Mr. Ravinder Pahal, Proprietor of M/s R.
Aquaculture Transporter and GST Department, Delhi not received back.
Let the witnesses be summoned on PF and diet money shall be
payable at the spot.
Put up for remaining PE on 06.07.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
18.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
13.04.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Himanshu, proxy counsel for defendant (through VC).
PW1 Shri Raj Kumar Kapil has tendered his evidence by way
of affidavit in examination in chief, but proxy counsel for defendant sought
adjournment as main counsel is not well. The conduct of the defendant is
not upto mark on record accordingly, cost of Rs. 10,000/- is imposed on
defendant. Cross examination of PW1 is deferred for the next date of
hearing.
Plaintiff has filed an application U/o 16 Rule 1 CPC for
summoning of witness as per list of witnesses. Let witnesses be summoned
on filing of PF for the next date of hearing. Diet money shall be payable at
the spot.
Put up for cross examination of PW1 and remaining PE on
18.05.2026. PW1 Shri Raj Kumar Kapil is directed to remain present on the
next date of hearing.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
13.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No.127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram Fisheries
10.03.2026
Present: Mr. Deepak Saini, proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Mr. Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
No PW is present.
Adjournment sought on the ground that main counsel is not
available, due to function in his family.
Heard.
Though no explanation tendered as to why advance copy of
affidavit has not been supplied, yet in the interest of justice, adjournment
granted.
Put up for PE on 13.04.2026. Advance copy of affidavit be
supplied to opposite party atleast one week prior to next date of hearing. It is
being made clear that no adjournment on next date of hearing shall be
granted to both parties in any condition whatsoever.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
10.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No. 376/23
Richcredit Finance P. Ltd. Vs. Harpreet Singh
11.02.2026
Present: Shri Dipanshu Meena, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Maninder Jeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 1
and 2.
Arguments on application under Order 11 Rule 1 (4) of
Commercial Courts Act heard.
Put up for order on abovesaid application at 4.00 PM.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
11.02.2026
At 4.00 PM
Present: None.
Vide my separate order, application under Order 11 Rule 1 (4)
of Commercial Courts Act has been allowed, subject to cost of Rs. 10,000/-
to be paid to the defendants.
Put up for DE on 24.03.2026. Advance copy of affidavit be
supplied to opposite party atleast one week prior to next date of hearing.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
11.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
22.01.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Shri Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
No time left.
Put up for order on 11.02.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge
(Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
22.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No. 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram fisheries
08.01.2026
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Shri Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
Arguments heard on the applicaton U/o 13A CPC.
Put up for order on 22.1.2026.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
08.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No.127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. Antram fisheries
19.11.2025
Present: Mr. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Mr. Amit Punia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
Case is fixed for reply and arguments on application under
Order XIIIA read with Order VIII Rule 3A & 5 of CPC, but Ld. Counsels
for both parties have connected through VC and have submitted that
there may be chances of settlement between the parties and this matter
may be referred to Mediation Cell.
At joint request, this case is referred to Mediation Cell on
26.11.2025 at 2.00 PM.
Put up for further proceedings on 12.12.2025. Both the
parties are directed to sign referral letter of mediation today itself only
then this matter may be referred to Mediation.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi /19.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
27.10.2025
Present: Ms. Aayushi Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
(through VC)
Shri Amit Poonia, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through
VC).
No PW is present but plaintiff has filed one application
U/o XIII-A read with order VIII Rules 3A & 5 CPC. Copy supplied.
Defendant to file reply to the said application by the next date of
hearing.
Put up for 19.11.2025 for reply and for arguments on
the above said application.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi /27.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
08.09.2025
Present: Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Plaintiff has filed an application seeking striking off the
defence of the defendants No. 1 to 4. Copy stated to have supplied.
However, application is not having court fee and same be fixed by
the next date of hearing positively. Let reply to this application be
filed by next date of hearing with advance copy to opposite party.
Put up for reply and arguments on 22.09.2025.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi
08.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No. 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. M/s Antram Fisheries
23.08.2025
Present: Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
None for defendant.
Proxy counsel for plaintiff has connected through VC and
has submitted that plaintiff has filed one application for seeking striking
of defence of defendant through online, whereas physical copy is yet to
be filed. On the other hand, none is connected on behalf of defendant.
Today advocates are on strike, due to no adverse order is
being passed.
Put up for further proceedings on 08.09.2025.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi /23.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil
Vs. m/s antram fisheries
30.07.2025
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Shri Amit Punia – Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Case is fixed for admission-denial of documents whereas
defendant has not filed any affidavit of admission-denial of documents
despite various opportunities. However, Ld. Counsel for defendant has
argued that claim of plaintiff has already been satisfied qua defendant no.
1 whereas defendant no. 5 has already been deleted and remaining claim
is qua defendant no. 5 only.
On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that
defendant has failed to file affidavit of admission-denial of documents
and now defence of the defendant is liable to be struck off and WS is to
be kept off the record.
Time sought for filing appropriate application. Granted.
Put up on 23.08.2025.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi
30.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. M/s Antram Fisheries
07.07.2025
Present: Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
In the last order sheet, it is recorded that preliminary
objections filed by plaintiff, whereas no such separate preliminary
objections filed. Accordingly, previous ordersheet rectified.
Defendant has not supplied copy of affidavit of
admission/denial of documents to plaintiff. Be supplied within three days
positively.
On last date of hearing, both the parties were directed to
remain present for admission / denial of documents, but today advocates
are on strike.
Both the parties are again directed to comply with previous
order for 30.07.2025.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi
07.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
04.06.2025
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Amit Punia Ld. Counsel for defendant on VC.
Replication along with affidavit of admission/denial
filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy to opposite party be supplied
within three days.
Preliminary objections filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Copies be supplied within three days.
Defendant also stated to have filed similar affidavit.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has submitted that he has not received the
copies of affidavit. Be supplied within three days against due
acknowledgment.
Put up on 07.07.2025 for admission/denial of
documents.
Both the parties shall remain present for
admission/denial of documents.
(Devender Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
East District, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi
04.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
24.04.2025
Present: Sh. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Amit Puniya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he is not
pressing his application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC as well
as under Order XI Rule 1 of CPC. He prayed that both these
applications may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the submissions made by Ld. Counsel of
plaintiff, the applications filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC as well
as under Order XI Rule 1 of CPC are dismissed as not pressed.
One opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to file
replication, before the next date of hearing.
Re-notify for filing Replication, Affidavit of Admission /
Denial, if any as well as for framing of issues on 17.05.2025.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-24.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. M/s Antram Fisheries
17.03.2025
Present: Sh. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Harsh Bhardwaj, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
defendant, joined through V.C.
Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant submits that the
main counsel has noted the next date of hearing as 27.03.2025, due to
which, he is not available today.
Reply to the application has also not been filed.
One last opportunity is granted to the defendant to file
reply before the next date of hearing.
Re-notify for filing reply and disposal of all the pending
applications on 29.03.2025.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-17.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
28.02.2025
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for plaintiff joined
through VC.
Shri Amit Punia – Ld. Counsel for defendant joined
through VC.
Defendant has not filed reply to the application under Order 6
Rule 17 CPC and under Order 11 Rule 1(5) CPC. One last opportunity
is granted.
Put up for filing reply and disposal of both the applications on
17.03.2025.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-28.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
03.02.2025
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for plaintiff joined
through VC.
Shri Amit Puniya – Ld. Counsel for defendant joined
through VC.
Plaintiff has filed two applications, one under order 6 Rule 17
CPC and another under Order 11 Rule 1(5) CPC, copy of which has
already been supplied to Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Defendant is directed to file reply to both these applications
before the next date.
Put up for filing reply and disposal of these applications on
28.02.2025.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-03.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
04.11.2024
Present: Proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Defendant has not filed reply to the application even has not
collected the copy from the record. One last and final opportunity is
granted to the defendant to file reply, failing which necessary orders
shall be passed.
Put up for filing reply and disposal of application on
13.11.2024.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-04.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
07.10.2024
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed an application under Order 6
Rule 17 CPC alongwith amended plaint and statement of truth. Copies
have been placed on record.
Defendant is directed to file reply to the application before the
next date of hearing.
Put up for filing reply and for disposal of the application on
04.11.2024.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-07.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
21.09.2024
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Shri Harsh Bhardwaj – Ld. Counsel for all the
defendants joined through VC.
Plaintiff has not filed replication and affidavit of admission-
denial of documents. One last opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to
file the same.
Put up for filing replication, affidavit of admission-denial of
documents and framing of issues on 07.10.2024.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-21.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
29.08.2024
Present: Shri Manish Dua – Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Shri Amit Poonia – Ld. Counsel for all the defendants.
Ld. Counsel for defendants has filed written statement
alongwith statement of truth and vakalatnama through online mode as
well as physical mode, copy of which has already been filed.
The plaintiff shall file replication if any before the next date of
hearing.
Put up for filing replication, affidavit of admission-denial of
documents, framing of issues as well as case management hearing on
21.09.2024.
(Pitamber Dutt)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-29.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
03.08.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Amit Poonia, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2.
None for defendant no. 1, 3 & 4.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed speed/registered
postal receipts alongwith respective track reports.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2 has filed an application
u/s 151 CPC on the ground that some pages of the plaint are not
legible. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submit that he will supply the
deficient/legible copy of the respective pages to Ld. Counsel for the
defendant no. 2 within two days. Application stands disposed of
accordingly.
Put up on 29.08.2024 at 02:00 PM.
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-03.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs. m/s antram fisheries
02.07.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Aswal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed amended memo of
parties thereby deleting the defendant no. 5 & 6 from memo of parties.
Statement of Truth as well as non-starter report from
DLSA is on record.
Let summons for settlement of issues be issued to the
defendants on filing of PF, RC, speed post, copies, etc. for
03.08.2024. PF be filed within one week.
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-02.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil vs M/s Antram Fisheries Pvt. Ltd.
08.05.2024
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he will be deleting
defendants no. 5 & 6 from the array of parties and will be filing
appropriate application in this regard alongwith amended memo of
parties.
Put up on 02.07.2024.
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-08.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)127/24
Raj Kumar Kapil Vs.
m/s antram fisheries
27.04.2024
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
It is noted that plaintiff has impleaded the Directors of defendant no.
1 company as defendants no. 2 to 5 and has made a partnership firm as
defendant no. 6.
Heard.
Put up for consideration on 08.05.2024 (02.00 pm).
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-27.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS(Comm) 127/2024
Raj Kumar Kapil vs M/s Antram Fisheries
20.04.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Shri Pradeep Aswal – Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through
VC.
Put up for consideration on 27.04.2024.
(Arvind Kumar)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
East/Karkardooma Courts-20.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --