Full Order Text
Final Order 4 · 20 May 2025 · CNR DLET010022102025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Page no. 1 CNR no. DLET01-002210-2025 Bail matters No. 367/2025 State versus Ritik Malya son of Lt. Sh. Manoj Kumar First Information Report No. 187/2025 Police Station Kalyanpuri Under Section 21/29/61/85 20.05.2025 Present : Sh. Ramesh Bajiya, Ld. Addl. PP for the State. Sh. UA Khan, ld. counsel for applicant/ accused Ritik Malya. Arguments were heard on the bail application of accused Ritik Malya. It is submitted on behalf of applicant that applicant is peace loving and law abiding citizen of India having faith in due process of law. It is further submitted that as per the case of the prosecution, on 06.04.2025 at about 5:30 pm, one secret informer came in the office ANS East Distt, Delhi and informed that one person namely Suresh R/o 4 Block, Trilokpuri, Delhi, who used to sale smack at 4 Block Trilok Puri, Delhi will come between 7-8 pm and thereafter, the secret informer was produced before Insp. Arun Kumar and thereafter, the said information was further conveyed to ACP Sh. Pawan Kumar concerned who further directed to take the appropriate legal action. It is further submitted that the said information was reduced into writing vide DD no.6 at 6:15 pm dated 06.04.2025 in compliance of section 42 NDPS Act and thereafter, a raiding team was constituted on the direction of ACP. It is further submitted that at about 6:50 pm, the members of the raiding team left the office of ANS East Distt, while recording the DD no. 7 at 6:50 pm dated 06.04.2025 and reached at the spot i.e. 4 Block, Trilokpuri, Delhi at 7:05 pm and at about 7:45 pm, the secret informer pointed out one person who was sitting outside his house i.e. 4/459, Trilokpuri, Delhi as Suresh, who was apprehended by the members of the raiding team. It is further -- 1 of 6 -- Page no. 2 submitted that the said person revealed his name as Suresh Kumar @ Sumit S/o Sh. Ajay Kumar R/o H. NO. 4/462-463 Trilokpuri, Delhi and the members of the raiding team introduced themselves informing the accused with regard to the secret information, who was also apprised about his legal right that they have the information that contraband may be recovered from the possession of said person and therefore, his search was required to be taken and this was his legal right that before taking his search, if he wished, he shall be produced before any Nearest Gazetted Officer or the Magistrate and he was also informed that before his personal search, he could take the search of police personnel and their vehicle and thereafter, a notice U/s 50 NDPS Act was served upon him but said person refused to be searched in the presence of any Nearest Gazetted Officer or the Magistrate. It is further submitted that the said information was conveyed to the ACP concerned, who directed SI Deepak to take the appropriate legal action and thereafter, his personal search was conducted and during his personal search, one pink colour purse was recovered from the left pocket of his jeans pant and after opening the same, one weighty white colour polythene was found inside the purse containing some red sticky substance was found and thereafter, the mobile crime team was called and the weight of the contraband was conducted, which was found to be 35.52 gram smack, which was taken into the police possession and the present FIR was registered. It is further submitted that during further investigation on 10.04.2025, the applicant/ accused was apprehended at about 9.30 pm, on 10.04.2025 at the red light of Rahul Vihar, Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. and alleged recovery of 26 gram heroin was shown to be recovered from his possession, however, nothing was recovered from his possession and therefore, no public -- 2 of 6 -- Page no. 3 person was joined during the search and seizure proceedings. It is further submitted that applicant/ accused is remotely not connected with the present case in any manner and he has no relation whatsoever with the main accused Suresh Kumar and the prosecution cannot show any evidence either in the form of CDR Connectivity or any monetary transaction between them or any whatsapp chat, therefore, in the absence of any incriminating evidence against the applicant/ accused to connect him with the main accused. It is further submitted that applicant/ accused as well as his family members has the serious apprehension that he was falsely implicated in the present case at the instance of his Taau namely Rajesh as well as his son namely Rohit @ Golu who kept enmity with the applicant/ accused as well as his family members on the ground that the grandfather of the applicant/ accused gifted his house in the name of his mother and they are residing in the said house and even in the past, they have given the specific threats to the family members of the applicant/ accused that either to give their share in the said property or ready to face the dire consequences and therefore, the false implication of the applicant/ accused in the present case cannot be ruled out at this stage. It is further submitted that even as per the alleged story of the prosecution, 26 gram heroin was allegedly recovered from the possession of the applicant/ accused, the said recovery falls within the category of intermediate quantity and much less than the commercial quantity and therefore, rigors of section 37 NDPS Act are not attracted in the present case. It is further submitted that applicant/ accused is in custody since 10.04.2025 and the investigation qua the applicant/ accused has already been completed and his false implication cannot be ruled out even at this stage and therefore, no useful purpose would be -- 3 of 6 -- Page no. 4 served to keep the applicant/ accused behind the bar during the course of the investigation as his further custodial interrogation is not required in the present case. Reliance is placed on the judgment of Chukwnemika Vs State, Bail Application no.387/18, Mohd. Navi Vs State, 2019 (1) C.C. Cases (HC) 390, Rekha Vs State, Bail Application no. 3392/2024 and Herry Vs State, 2021 (2) JCC 1051. It is further submitted that applicant/ accused is a 24 year young married man having three minor children and belongs to a poor family, earning his livelihood while working on his water plant situated at G-78, Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad, UP and in his absence, his family members are facing great hardship to meet out their day to day expenses and the presence of the applicant/ accused is very much required to look after the well- being of their family. It is further submitted that investigation qua the applicant/ accused has already been completed and the sampling of the alleged recovered contraband has already been conducted before the Ld. JMFC and therefore, no useful purpose would be served to keep him behind the bar. It is further submitted that applicant / accused undertakes to abide by all the conditions imposed by this Court and to furnish the sound surety to the entire satisfaction of the Court. Thus, it is prayed that accused may be enlarged on bail. Reply has been filed on behalf of IO. It is stated that on 06.04.2025, SI Deepak received a secret information that a person namely “Suresh”, who is the resident of 4 Block Trilokpuri, Delhi, sells the illegal smack between 07:00 PM to 08:00 PM in 4 Block, Trilokpuri, Delhi. Acting on the information, the raiding team set up a trap at in front of H.No. 4/462-63 Trilokpuri, Delhi. They nabbed the said individual namely Suresh Kumar @ Sumit S/O Ajay Kumar R/O H. No. 4/462-63 Trilokpuri, -- 4 of 6 -- Page no. 5 Delhi, Aged 30 Years in front of H. No. 4/462-63 Trilokpuri, Delhi. Search of the apprehended person was conducted and a pink colour purse was recovered from left pocket of his wearing jeans and after opening the chain of purse a weighty transparent polythene was recovered from purse and an another transparent polythene and 36.22 Grams of Smack with the weight of polythene and 35.52 Grams of smack was recovered from the said transparent polythene. The forensic team was called at the spot and the brown coloured substance was found Brown/Heroine after checked by Dr. Drishti, Forensic Team. It was seized and sealed with the seal of DK and taken into police possession vide seizure memo and was deposited in PS Kalyanpuri Malkhana through SHO Kalyanpuri. Accordingly, the present case was registered. During investigation, accused “Sumit” had disclosed that he used to buy Smack/Heroin from one Ritik. Accused Ritik S/o Late Manoj Kumar R/O BH-241 Bharaow Devres, Colony Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad UP, Aged 24 years was arrested in the present case at the instance of accused Suresh and 26.45 gram smack was recovered from the possession of accused Ritik. Which was also seized and sealed with the seal of SK and taken into police possession through seizure memo and was deposited in PS Kalyanpuri malkhana through SHO Kalyanpuri. The sampling of recovered contrabands were done before the Court and the case property was deposited in FSL for expert opinion. Further investigation is underway. Accused Ritik Mallya was arrested on the instance/ disclosure of accused Suresh Kumar @ Sumit and total recovery in this case is 61.97 Grams of Smack/Heroin. The offence is against the society and he may again indulge in same type of offence. Total 26.45 gram of Smack/Heroin was recovered from the possession of accused/ applicant Ritik. He is previously -- 5 of 6 -- Page no. 6 involved in Case FIR No.1182/19 u/s 8/15 NDPS ACT PS Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad UP. Therefore, it is requested that accused may not be enlarged on bail. The contraband recovered from the applicant in the present case is 26.45 gram smack, which falls under intermediate quantity. The police remand of the accused has already been taken. The reply filed by the IO is complete silent on the point whether any further interrogation of the accused is required. Since, the quantity recovered from the accused falls under intermediate quantity, rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable. The culpability of the accused is matter of trial and bail cannot be denied as pre-trial conviction. The presence of accused can be secured by imposing conditions. Accordingly, the present application is allowed and applicant/ accused Ritik Malya is granted bail on furnishing PB in sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties in the like amount each on the following condition:- The surety should be local resident of Delhi or blood relative of accused. The accused is directed to inform the IO regarding his mobile phone number and address as well as any change in the same. The accused shall not contact, influence or coerce any witness/ person connected with the present case. The accused shall also not indulge in any kind of offence after being released from jail on bail. The accused shall not leave Delhi/NCR without informing the IO. Accused shall appear on each and every date of hearing fixed by the Court. Bail application is accordingly disposed off. Order dasti. (Alok Shukla) Additional Session Judge-2/ Special Judge (Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances) East/Karkardooma/Delhi/20.05.2025 -- 6 of 6 --
