RAJEEVVsDINESH KUMAR

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No:- 90/2025
RAJEEV Vs. DINESH KUMAR
05.06.2026
Present:- Appellant in person along with proxy counsel.
Respondent in person along with Ld. Counsels Sh S.
K. Arya and Sh. Ankut Sharma.
On previous date of hearing appellant claimed that
present matter had been settled between the parties and he would
pay the entire settlement amount today.
However, appellant has not brought any settlement
amount and seeks some more time to pay the same. Request of
appellant is opposed on behalf of respondent as it is prayed that
appellant is deliberately delaying the proceedings of the Court.
Be that as it may, the matter shall proceed further on
merits.
Adjournment requested on behalf of appellant due to
absence of his main counsel. One last opportunity granted.
Put up for arguments on 19.09.2026.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04, East District
KKD Courts, Delhi: 05.06.2026
(G)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No:- 90/2025
RAJEEV Vs. DINESH KUMAR
13.04.2026
Present:- Wife of appellant in person.
Sh. Sunender Paswan, Ld. Counsel for appellant
through VC.
Respondent in person along with Proxy Counsel
Sh. Kamal Goswami (Enrollment No.
D-4344/2019).
It is submitted on behalf of appellant that the present
matter has already been amicably settled between the parties and
appellant would pay the entire settlement amount on NDOH.
Request not opposed.
Put up for payment of settlement amount and
recording of statement of parties on 05.06.2026.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04, East District
KKD Courts, Delhi: 13.04.2026
(G)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 90/2025
Rajeev Vs Dinesh Kumar
26.11.2025.
Pr:- Appellant in person along with Ld. Counsel Sh. Summinder
Paswan (Fresh V/N filed).
Sh. Vaishnav Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent along with
respondent.
An application under Section 148 (3) NI Act is moved on
behalfof the respondent.
It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that he is ready and
willing to pay the cheque amount along with suitable interest to the
respondent in terms of judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Ors Crl. Appeal No. 1755 of 2010
decided on 25.09.2025.
Adjournment is requested on behalf of the respondent due to
absence of main counsel.
Put up for further proceedings on 06.02.2026.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04/East/KKD:
Delhi : 26.11.2025m
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 90/2025
Rajeev Vs Dinesh Kumar
01.08.2025.
Pr:- Appellant in person.
Sh. Ravinder Kumar Sharma along with Ms. Kumkum Sharma,
Ld. Counsels for the appellant.
Respondent in person along with Ld. Counsel Sh. S.K. Arya.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed by Sh. S.K. Arya, Ld. Counsel along
with an application for furnishing correct/ present address of the
respondent. Let the same be taken on record.
Appellant is directed to file amended memo of parties. Copy of
the appeal supplied to the respondent against due acknowledgment.
Today, appellant has deposited 20% amount in terms of previous
order for a sum of Rs. 80,000/- by way of FD bearing Account no.
HCS-4491-259260725 of Himanshi Co-operative (Urban) Thrift &
Credit Society Limited dated 26.07.2025. Bail bond is furnished and
same is accepted.
Put up for filing of reply/ arguments on 26.11.2025.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04/East/KKD:
Delhi : 01.08.2025
m
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CNR No. DLET01- 001877-2025
CA 90/2025
RAJEEV Vs. DINESH KUMAR
19.09.2026
Pr: Sh. V.P. Singh, Ms. Kumkum Sharma and Sh. Summider
Paswan, Ld. Counsels for the appellant.
Sh. S.K. Arya, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Cash amount of Rs. 10,000/- in terms of settlement, has been
received by the respondent today before the court.
Put up for further payment on 24.10.2026.
(Babita Puniya)
ASJ-03/East/KKD:
Delhi : 19.09.2026m
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No:- 90/2025
RAJEEV Vs. DINESH KUMAR
05.06.2026
Present:- Appellant in person along with proxy counsel.
Respondent in person along with Ld. Counsels Sh S.
K. Arya and Sh. Ankut Sharma.
On previous date of hearing appellant claimed that
present matter had been settled between the parties and he would
pay the entire settlement amount today.
However, appellant has not brought any settlement
amount and seeks some more time to pay the same. Request of
appellant is opposed on behalf of respondent as it is prayed that
appellant is deliberately delaying the proceedings of the Court.
Be that as it may, the matter shall proceed further on
merits.
Adjournment requested on behalf of appellant due to
absence of his main counsel. One last opportunity granted.
Put up for arguments on 19.09.2026.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04, East District
KKD Courts, Delhi: 05.06.2026
(G)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No:- 90/2025
RAJEEV Vs. DINESH KUMAR
13.04.2026
Present:- Wife of appellant in person.
Sh. Sunender Paswan, Ld. Counsel for appellant
through VC.
Respondent in person along with Proxy Counsel
Sh. Kamal Goswami (Enrollment No.
D-4344/2019).
It is submitted on behalf of appellant that the present
matter has already been amicably settled between the parties and
appellant would pay the entire settlement amount on NDOH.
Request not opposed.
Put up for payment of settlement amount and
recording of statement of parties on 05.06.2026.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04, East District
KKD Courts, Delhi: 13.04.2026
(G)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 90/2025
Rajeev Vs Dinesh Kumar
26.11.2025.
Pr:- Appellant in person along with Ld. Counsel Sh. Summinder
Paswan (Fresh V/N filed).
Sh. Vaishnav Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent along with
respondent.
An application under Section 148 (3) NI Act is moved on
behalfof the respondent.
It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that he is ready and
willing to pay the cheque amount along with suitable interest to the
respondent in terms of judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Ors Crl. Appeal No. 1755 of 2010
decided on 25.09.2025.
Adjournment is requested on behalf of the respondent due to
absence of main counsel.
Put up for further proceedings on 06.02.2026.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04/East/KKD:
Delhi : 26.11.2025m
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 90/2025
Rajeev Vs Dinesh Kumar
01.08.2025.
Pr:- Appellant in person.
Sh. Ravinder Kumar Sharma along with Ms. Kumkum Sharma,
Ld. Counsels for the appellant.
Respondent in person along with Ld. Counsel Sh. S.K. Arya.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed by Sh. S.K. Arya, Ld. Counsel along
with an application for furnishing correct/ present address of the
respondent. Let the same be taken on record.
Appellant is directed to file amended memo of parties. Copy of
the appeal supplied to the respondent against due acknowledgment.
Today, appellant has deposited 20% amount in terms of previous
order for a sum of Rs. 80,000/- by way of FD bearing Account no.
HCS-4491-259260725 of Himanshi Co-operative (Urban) Thrift &
Credit Society Limited dated 26.07.2025. Bail bond is furnished and
same is accepted.
Put up for filing of reply/ arguments on 26.11.2025.
(Akash Jain)
ASJ-04/East/KKD:
Delhi : 01.08.2025
m
-- 1 of 1 --