Full Order Text
Interim Order 8 · 18 Nov 2025 · CNR DLET010006122025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: RCA DJ 9/25 ANISHA TV CORNER AND ANR. Vs. MAHENDER SINGH 18.11.2025 Present : None for appellant. Ms. Chitra, Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent. a) Arguments already heard on application u/O XLI rule 27 CPC r/w section 151 CPC filed by the appellant to summon additional official witness in respect of certain documents already filed by the appellant before Ld. Trial Court. b) It is argued that the appellant/defendant had filed documents i.e, DW1/1 to DW1/13 before Ld. Trial Court and also tendered the same in his examination in chief, however, since the respondent/plaintiff had not raised any objection at the time of tendering of the aforesaid documents, no official witness was summoned by the appellant/defendant to prove the said documents. c) It is further argued that since there was no objection on behalf of plaintiff/respondent at the time of tendering of aforesaid documents by the DW1, therefore, the appellant was under impression that the said documents were impliedly admitted by the plaintiff/respondent. d) I do not agree with the contentions of the Ld. Counsel for appellant as the issue with regard to admissibility of the documents is different from proving the same. Admissibility of documents means whether a document can be presented before the Court, however, proving the same means establishing the -- 1 of 2 -- contents of the said document by examining writer thereof. It is correct that the respondent/plaintiff did not raise any objection with regard to admissibility of the aforesaid documents during cross-examination of DW1, however, the same would not absolve the appellant/defendant from proving the contents of the said documents. e) Since no plausible reasons have been given by the appellant for not taking appropriate steps to prove the aforesaid documents before Ld. Trial Court, no opportunity can be given to the appellant at this stage to summon any official witness. In view thereof, the application stands dismissed with cost of Rs. 3,000/- to be deposited in Shahdara Bar Association, KKD, Delhi. Arguments on instant appeal already heard on behalf of appellant. Put up for final arguments on behalf of respondent on 03.12.2025. (Hem Singh) District Judge-01 (East)/KKD/Delhi/18.11.2025 -- 2 of 2 --
