Full Order Text
Order 1 · 22 Jan 2025 · CNR DLET010001452025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CT Cases / 20/2025 BSES YPL Vs. Dinesh kumar 22.01.2025 Fresh complaint case received. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Honey Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for complainant company. Sh. Mukesh Sharma, AR for the Complainant. CW1 Sh. Mukesh Sharma and CW2 Sh. Vivek Prajapati (Assistant Manager) examined and discharged. AR of the complainant company submits that he does not want to examine further witness in pre-summoning evidence and request is made for closing pre-summoning evidence. In this regard, statement of AR of the complainant company is recorded separately. Accordingly, pre-summoning evidence stands closed. Arguments heard. It is stated by the AR that the complainant company has led the pre-summoning evidence in this case and examined CW1 and CW2 who have proved the documents with regard to theft of electricity on record and thus, there is sufficient evidence for summoning of the accused in this case. Perusal of the record reveals that the complainant company has filed complaint U/s 151 r/w section 154(5) of the electricity Act for the offences u/s 135 of the Electricity Act. The pre-summoning evidence led by the complainant company has been perused. In support of the complaint, complainant company has examined CW1 Sh Mukesh Sharma, AR who has filed his -- 1 of 2 -- affidavit Ex.CW1/A. By way of said affidavit, he has brought on record the GPA and present complaint are Ex. CW1/1 and Ex.CW1/2. The complainant has also examined CW2 who has filed his affidavit Ex.CW2/A and proved the relevant documents as Ex.CW2/1 to Ex.CW2/10 i.e. inspection report, load report, seizure memo, Advisory notice, theft bill, certificate U/s 63 (4) of BSA, RC of vehicle, Postal Receipt, demand notice and CD of videography which are Ex.CW2/1 and CW2/10 respectively. It is well settled principle of law that at the time of summoning of accused, only prima-facie material is to be seen. Perusal of the complaint, affidavit of CW1 and CW2 as well as documents placed on record, this Court is of the view that there is sufficient prima-facie material to summon the accused in this case for the offence punishable under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003. Accused be summoned on filing of PF as well as all modes for 28.02.2025. (ASHISH RASTOGI) ASJ-05(Electricity)/East Karkardooma Courts Delhi /22.01.2025 -- 2 of 2 --
