Full Order Text
Interim Order 12 · 15 Oct 2025 · CNR DLET010000072025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: IA No:- 2/2025 SC No:- 1/2025 STATE Vs. AMIT @ POLI ETC. FIR No:- 414/2024 Police Station:- Kalyan Puri 15.10.2025 File is taken up today on 1st application under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail moved on behalf of applicant/accused Chand Babu @ Chandu S/o Mr. Israil through Ld. Counsel. Present:- Sh. Vineet Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for the State. Complainant in person along with Ld. Counsel Ms. Pinky Rani. Sh. A. K. Bali, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Chand Babu @ Chandu S/o Mr. Israil. Brief allegations against present applicant/accused are that he hatched criminal conspiracy to commit murder of deceased Babu Lal @ Rohit along with co-accused persons i.e. accused no. 1 Amit @ Poli, accused no. 3 Rohit @ Apple and CCL ‘P’ @ ‘A’. It is argued by Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused that accused is young boy of 22 years of age, having deep roots in the society and is the sole bread earner of his family. It is argued that present applicant/accused is in custody since 24.11.2024 and charge had already been framed in this case. It is further argued that present applicant/accused was neither named in FIR nor was present at the spot at the relevant date and time of alleged incident. It is further argued that no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping applicant/accused behind the bars. Contd….2 -- 1 of 3 -- :2: IA No:- 2/2025 SC No:- 1/2025 STATE Vs. AMIT @ POLI ETC. FIR No:- 414/2024 Police Station:- Kalyan Puri Per contra, it is argued by Ld. Addl. PP for the State that offences alleged against present applicant/accused are grave and serious in nature. It is argued that present applicant/accused is master mind who hatched criminal conspiracy to commit murder of deceased Babu Lal @ Rohit along with co-accused persons. It is argued that there are eye-witnesses i.e. brother namely, Shivam and sister namely, Neha of deceased who had seen both the accused persons i.e. Amit @ Poli and Rohit @ Apple at the spot committing incident in question. Moreover, it is argued that accused Rohit @ Apple along with CCL ‘P’ @ ‘A’ are seen in CCTV footage while following the deceased on the relevant date and time of incident and accused Amit @ Poli is seen reaching the spot of incident at about 12:53 PM while holding the knife. It is further argued that during investigation it is brought on record that applicant/ accused Chand Babu @ Chandu was in constant touch with co-accused persons and had spoken to CCL ‘P’ @ ‘A’ on the date of incident i.e. 01.09.2024 at about 10:36 AM. It is further argued that immediately after the incident in question accused Amit @ Poli made two calls to accused Chand Babu @ Chandu at about 01:33 PM and 01:46 PM which shows complicity of accused Chand Babu @ Chandu in commission of alleged offences. Thereater, accused Amit @ Poli ran to the house of accused Chand Babu @ Chandu where he changed his clothes and later on both of Contd….3 -- 2 of 3 -- :3: IA No:- 2/2025 SC No:- 1/2025 STATE Vs. AMIT @ POLI ETC. FIR No:- 414/2024 Police Station:- Kalyan Puri them disposed of the clothes worn by accused Amit @ Poli (at the time of relevant incident) in Hindon river with intention to screening accused Amit @ Poli from punishment. I have heard the arguments on behalf of both the parties and carefully perused the record. Considering the totality of circumstances, role of present applicant/ accused, severity of allegations in question, fact that present matter is still at its initial stage and not a single witness is examined so far, this Court does not deem it expedient to grant bail to present applicant/accused Chand Babu @ Chandu S/o Mr. Israil at this stage. Present application is accordingly stands dismissed. Copy of the order be given “dasti” to Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused as requested. Now, to come up on date fixed i.e. 19.11.2025 for purpose already fixed. (Akash Jain) ASJ-04, East District KKD Courts, Delhi: 15.10.2025 (G) -- 3 of 3 --
