Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 3

CNR DLCT12000303202629 Aug 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 3 · 29 Aug 2026 · CNR DLCT120003032026

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: DLCT120003032026
CC NO. CBI 73/2026
CBI VS. BADMANABAN NARESH @ B. NARESH & ORS.
RC NO. 221/2026/E/006
29.08.2026
Present: Sh. Saurabh Singh, Ld. PP for the CBI through VC.
Accused Badmanaban Naresh @ B. Naresh (A-1)
and Sanij Saha (A-2) produced from JC.
IO/DSP Jugal Kishore Joshi, CBI, EO-III, in person.
A-3 M/s Panlogistics Services Private Ltd is a
company.
Sh. Raghunatha Sethupathy B, Sh. Nayan Nishchal
and Sh. Pareekshit Bishnoi, Ld. counsel for accused
B Naresh.
Sh. Ankit Vashisth, Ld. LADC for accused Sanij
Saha (A-2) through VC.
(1) Matter is listed today for consideration on the charge
sheet.
(2) Submissions on the point of cognizance heard.
(3) The case of the prosecution as alleged in the charge-sheet
is that present FIR was registered against accused Badmanaban
Naresh @ B Naresh (A-1), Sanjib Saha (A-2) and M/s
Panlogistics Services Pvt. Ltd (A-3) on 24.04.2026 on the basis
of a written complaint by Sh. Anupam Patra, Registrar (J),
Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.
(4) As per the charge sheet, a fake/fraudulent website bearing
the URL scigovjudicial.com was found on the internet,
-- 1 of 3 --
:: 2 ::
deceptively resembling the official website of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India, i.e. www.sci.gov.in. Preliminary
examination of the same revealed that the fake website imitated
the design, structure and substantial contents of the official
website with the apparent intention of misleading the public. It is
alleged that the said website also displayed the logos of the
Central Bureau of Investigation and Delhi Police, links to fake
case number and case status pages, thereby creating a false
impression of authenticity and official association. The creation
and operation of the said website is alleged to have been
undertaken with the intention of deceiving the public for
unlawful financial gains, causing corresponding wrongful loss to
innocent victims.
(5) It is further alleged that investigation has revealed that a
total of 66 bank accounts were used for receiving cheated
amounts from victims. The victims were induced by the
fraudsters to transfer money into these accounts. Out of the said
66 accounts, 23 accounts belonged to individuals, whereas 43
accounts were maintained in the names of companies/firms.
Investigation has further revealed that approximately 81 crores,
representing proceeds of crime, were routed through these 66
accounts. The cheated amount was thereafter layered through
approximately 3,300 second-layer bank accounts. investigation
into which 15 presently in progress.
(6) After culmination of the investigation, instant charge-
-- 2 of 3 --
:: 3 ::
sheet was filed.
(7) Specific role of each of the accused person has been
alleged in the charge sheet. There is sufficient material on record
to take cognizance of the offences alleged. Hence, I take
cognizance for commission of offences under Section 61(2),
318(4) and 340(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section
66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 against all the
accused persons mentioned in column no. 11 of the charge sheet.
(8) No formal summons are being issued to A-1 and A-2 who
are present before this court today. They are simply apprised of
the present order.
(9) In regards to A-3, let summons be issued to M/s
Panlogistics Services Pvt. Ltd (A-3) for 12.09.2026.
(10) At this stage, an application seeking supply of charge
sheet and accompanying documents is moved on behalf of A-1.
(11) In view of the submissions made, same stands allowed.
Copy of charge sheet along with accompanying documents as
well as pen-drive supplied to A-1 and A-2. Put up for scrutiny of
documents on NDOH.
(Amardeep Kaur)
ACJM-02-cum ACJ
RADC/New Delhi
29.08.2026
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.