Interim Order 16

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CC No. CBI/88/2024
RC-E0003 2022
CBI vs. M/s ALLIED STRIPES LTD. & ORS.
19.05.2026
Present: Sh. Arjun Anand, Ld. PP for the CBI through VC.
Accused no. 1 is M/s Allied Stripes Ltd.
[represented through counsel Sh. Guneet Sidhu
(through VC) and Sh. Verdhan Jain (in person) for
Jindal Steels, who had taken over the company in
IBC proceedings].
Accused no. 5 is M/s Sweta Agrochem Pvt. Ltd.
Accused no. 6 is M/s Diksha Viniyog Pvt. Ltd.
Accused no. 7 is M/s Survi Commotrade Pvt. Ltd.
Accused no. 8 is M/s Prominent Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd.
Accused no. 9 is M/s Chandramukhi Vinijya Pvt.
Ltd.
Accused no. 10 is M/s Sai Sahara Commercial Pvt.
Ltd.
Accused Supriya Roy, Sushil Kumar Purohit,
Mohinder Kumar Aggarwal @ M.K. Aggarwal,
Gaurav Aggarwal, Sunita Aggarwal and Dhruva
Narayan Jha in person.
Accused Ajay Goel, Bikash Mohapatra @ Prashant,
Aditya Kumar Kedia and Pankaj Kumar Kedia
through VC.
Sh. Saurabh Pal, Ld. counsel for accused Dhruv
Narayan Jha and Sushil Purohit.
Ms. Shelly Dixit, Ld. counsel for accused A-2 to
A-10.
Sh. Rakesh Rao, Ld. counsel for accused Bikash
Mohapatra @ Prashant, Pankaj Kumar Kedia and
Supriya Roy. (Fresh Vakalatnama filed)
IO has filed reply to the application u/s 227 CrPC
filed by Ld. counsel for M/s Jindal Steel who overtook A-1 as his
subsidiary company.
Ld. counsels for accused Supriya Roy, Sushil Kumar
Purohit, Sunita Aggarwal, Gaurav Aggarwal, Mohinder Kumar
-- 1 of 4 --
Aggarwal @ M.K. Aggarwal and Dhruva Narayan Jha have filed
applications under Section 480 BNSS (Section 437 CrPC)
seeking grant of regular bail. Copy supplied.
The application is orally contested by Ld. PP for the
CBI. It is stated by Ld. PP for the CBI that he has no objection in
allowing the present regular bail applications filed by the accused
Supriya Roy, Sushil Kumar Purohit, Sunita Aggarwal, Gaurav
Aggarwal, Mohinder Kumar Aggarwal @ M.K. Aggarwal and
Dhruva Narayan Jha.
Arguments on the bail applications have been heard.
Perusal of the file reveals that accused Supriya Roy,
Sushil Kumar Purohit, Sunita Aggarwal, Gaurav Aggarwal,
Mohinder Kumar Aggarwal @ M.K. Aggarwal and Dhruva
Narayan Jha were not arrested during the investigation. Charge
sheet has already been filed. No purpose will be served by
detaining them in custody at this stage. Therefore, in view of the
aforesaid facts and circumstances, accused Supriya Roy, Sushil
Kumar Purohit, Sunita Aggarwal, Gaurav Aggarwal, Mohinder
Kumar Aggarwal @ M.K. Aggarwal and Dhruva Narayan Jha
are admitted to bail on furnishing of their personal bonds in the
sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to
the conditions that: -
(i) accused/applicants shall not indulge in the offence/s of the
same nature.
(ii) accused/applicants shall not influence the witness/s and
shall join the further investigation and appear in the court
as and when directed to do so by the authorities concerned.
(iii) accused/applicants shall not hamper with the further
-- 2 of 4 --
investigation, if any, in any manner.
(iv) accused/applicants shall not leave India without prior
permission of this court.
Bail applications stand disposed of.
Requisite bonds on behalf of accused Sushil Kumar
Purohit, Bikash Mohapatra @ Prashant Gaurav Aggarwal, Sunita
Aggarwal, Gaurav Aggarwal, Mohinder Kumar Aggarwal @
M.K. Aggarwal and Dhruva Narayan Jha have been furnished.
Same are considered and accepted. Original /stamped
copy/photocopy of FDRs be retained on record. Concerned banks
be intimated.
Ld. counsel for accused Supriya Roy has filed an
application to release accused Supriya Roy on personal bonds as
he is not able to arrange surety. Heard. Allowed.
Requisite personal bonds on behalf of accused
Supriya Roy has been furnished. Same is considered and
accepted. Stamped copy of FDR be retained on record.
Concerned bank be intimated.
Ld. counsel for A-15 and A-16 has filed an
application u/s 207 CrPC to supply the copy of deficit
documents. Copy supplied.
Issue notice to HIO to supply the copy of deficit
documents to Ld. counsel for A-15 and A-16 on NDOH.
On inquiry from other accused persons as well as the
counsels whether scrutiny of documents is complete. No
response was received from any accused person or counsel in
negative. This shows that scrutiny of documents is complete qua
all the accused except A-15 and A-16.
-- 3 of 4 --
Put up for arguments on application u/s 227 CrPC
filed on behalf of M/s Jindal Steels as well as scrutiny of
documents on 17.07.2026.
(Mayank Goel)
ACJM-02-cum ACJ
RADC/New Delhi
19.05.2026
-- 4 of 4 --