Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 17

CNR DLCT12000156202330 May 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 17 · 30 May 2024 · CNR DLCT120001562023

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: IA/2/2024
CBI vs. Sahil Pal
In
CC No. CBI/64/2023
RC-221 2023 E0014
CBI vs. Himanshu @ Rinku Asija & Ors.
30.05.2024
Present: Sh. Arjun Anand, Ld. APP for the CBI.
IO/Inspector Pooja Muvel, EO-III, CBI, New Delhi
in person.
Accused/applicant Sahil Pal in person.
Sh. Manish Gupta and Ms. Deepti Verma, Ld.
counsels for accused Sahil Pal.
Matter is listed today for reply/arguments on the
application filed on behalf of applicant/accused Sahil Pal to seek
the indulgence of this court to issue appropriate directions to the
investigating officer to provide the pending relied upon
documents and also the unrelied/not relied upon documents in the
charge-sheet dated 23.09.2023 so filed in the aforesaid FIR.
Reply has been filed by CBI/prosecution to the
abovesaid application. Copy of the same has been supplied to Ld.
counsel for accused/applicant. Alongwith the reply, the
prosecution has filed a list of unrelied documents annexed as
Annexure 'A'.
The Ld. counsel for the accused submits that in the
reply, in para no. 3, the IO has admitted that several documents
were not supplied to the accused. He further submits that the
response of the IO should come on record. The IO, on the other
-- 1 of 2 --
hand, submits that all the documents were supplied to the
accused in soft copies but a few documents could not be supplied
in hard copies as their print outs were not legible.
The Ld. APP submits that hard copies of the
documents can be provided to the applicant today. However, the
Ld. counsel for the applicant that he will not be in a position to
tally the documents today and the same may be provided on the
NDOH.
Put up on for consideration on the application on
18.07.2024.
(NISHANT GARG)
ACMM-2 cum ACJ
RADC/New Delhi/30.05.2024
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.