Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 36

CNR DLCT12000025202313 Jul 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 36 · 13 Jul 2026 · CNR DLCT120000252023

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CC No. CBI/20/2023 RC-220/2020/E0015
CBI vs. M/s Govardhan Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
CC No. CBI/20/2023
RC-220/2020/E0015
CBI vs. M/s Govardhan Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
13.07.2026
Present: Sh. Arjun Anand, Ld. PP for the CBI.
Process Severs namely SI Akash, CBI, EO-II, New
Delhi in person.
Sh. I.V Raghav, Ld. counsel for Rajinder Rana.
Matter is listed today for consideration on the
charge-sheet/further proceedings.
It is stated by Rajinder Rana that police has pasted
notice outside his house despite the fact that accused Satendra
Kumar never resides there.
At this stage, three separate statements of Process
Servers has been recorded. Perused.
In view of the statement of Process Server who
carried out process under Section 82 CrPC against the accused
persons namely Satendra Kumar, Deshraj Raghuvanshi,
Madhukar Dubey and Bhim Singh Chauhan at their addresses,
recorded today and reports on the process under Section 82 CrPC
alongwith annexed documents Ex. CW1/A (colly) and
proclamations of accused Satendra Kumar and Deshraj
Raghuvanshi were also got published in the English and Hindi
newspaper “Times Day” and Qaumi Patrika” which is exhibited
as Ex. CW1/B and Ex. PW1/C and proclamation of accused
Madhukar Dubey and Bhim Singh Chauhan were got published
in the English newspaper “Hindustan Times” and in Hindi
newspaper “Dainik Jagran” Ex. CW1/D, Ex. CW1/F and Ex.
CW1/E, Ex. CW1/G, I am of the considered opinion that the
-- 1 of 2 --
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CC No. CBI/20/2023 RC-220/2020/E0015
CBI vs. M/s Govardhan Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
process under Section 82 CrPC has been duly executed upon the
accused persons namely Satendra Kumar, Deshraj Raghuvanshi,
Madhukar Dubey and Bhim Singh Chauhan at their addresses.
In accordance with Section 82 CrPC, the
abovenamed accused persons were given more than 40 days for
making their appearances before this court from the date of
execution of process under Section 82 CrPC, despite that they
have failed to appear in the court on the date given for their
appearances or thereafter.
Accordingly, it is established beyond reasonable
doubt that the accused persons namely Satendra Kumar, Deshraj
Raghuvanshi, Madhukar Dubey and Bhim Singh Chauhan are
absconding and there is no immediate prospect of arresting them.
Accordingly, the accused persons namely Satendra Kumar,
Deshraj Raghuvanshi, Madhukar Dubey and Bhim Singh
Chauhan are hereby declared as ‘proclaimed persons’.
Accordingly, application stands disposed of.
(Mayank Goel)
ACJM-02-cum-ACJ
RADC/New Delhi/13.07.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.