Interim Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CBI v. Prof. Ramesh Chandra Kishori Lal Goyal @ Ramesh Kumar Goyal
Bail Matter: 250/2026 [Applicant Prof. Ramesh Chandra Kishori Lal Goyal @
Ramesh Kumar Goyal]
FIR No. RC0032026A0040 dated 15.07.2026
PS: CBI, ACB
U/s: 120-B/420/467/468/471 of IPC and Section 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of PC Act.
05.09.2026
Present: Sh. M. Saraswat, Ld. Sr. PP for CBI.
Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for accused (through VC)
SPA of accused (through VC) and accused are present (through
VC).
IO/DSP Rajeev.
Reply to the anticipatory bail application is not filed by CBI today
stating that due to paucity of time and closure of the office on account of
Janmasthami holiday and Saturday and due to administrative delays, the detailed
reply to the anticipatory bail application could not be prepared. Ld. counsel for
the accused submits that his client is to travel back to India on the intervening
night of 5th /6th September, 2026 and he has apprehension that he may be picked
up and arrested at the Airport in case LOC has been opened at the behest of the
investigating agency in the present case. At this stage, on oral query from the IO
in the presence of the Ld. Sr. PP for CBI, the clarification has been given to the
Court by CBI that in the present case, IO has not got LOC issued or opened qua
the applicant/accused Ramesh Chandra Kishori Lal Goyal @ Ramesh Kumar
Goyal.
Since the reply to the anticipatory bail application is not ready, CBI
is granted one more date to file the reply and address arguments on the
anticipatory bail application on the next date of hearing.
Put up for reply/arguments on 09.09.2026 at 12.30 a.m.
IO is directed to appear with police file/case diary on the next date
of hearing.Dasti.
(Chhavi Kapoor)
Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)-07
Rouse Avenue Courts: New Delhi
05.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --