Order 16

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR No. DLCT11-001245-2025
CC No. 40/2025
State Vs. Rajendran Nair & Ors.
FIR No. 10/2022
P.S. Anti Corruption Branch
26.09.2026
Present: Mr. Vikash Kumar, Ld. Public Prosecutor for State.
Dr. Rajeev Goyal and Mr. Tahir Ali, Advocates for
accused Rajendran Nair and M/s Aurrum e
Payments Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. Rajat Kumar, adv. for accused Gopi Kumar
Kedia.
Ms. Supriya Juneja, Adv. for accused Abhilash
Vasukuttan Pillai through VC.
Mr. Dhananjay Gautam, Adv. for Abhilash
Vasukuttan Pillai.
Mr. Utkarsh Kumar, Adv. for accused Naresh
Kumar.
Mr. Riyaz Ahmed Baht and Mr. Ujjwal Bazariya,
Advocates for accused Anita.
Mr. Akshay Kumar, Adv. for accused Anoop Mittal
through VC.
Accused Rajendran Nair on behalf of himself and as
Ex-Director of M/s Aurrum e Payments Pvt. Ltd.,
Gopi Kumar Kedia, Abhilash Vasukuttan Pillai,
Naresh Kumar, Anita in person.
Accused Anoop Mittal is present through VC.
IO ACP Pramod Gupta is present.
Ld. Counsels for accused Rajendran Nair, Gopi
Kumar Kedia, Abhilash Vasukuttan Pillai, Anita and M/s Aurrum
e Payments Pvt. Ltd. have filed their respective vakalatnamas. The
same are taken on record.
Ld. Counsels for Naresh Kumar and Anoop Mittal
submit that they will file their respective vakalatnamas within one
week from today. Time granted.
Contd…..2/-
-- 1 of 3 --
-2-
Summons sent to M/s Fresh Pay IT Solutions have
been received back with the report that they have been served
upon the owner Mr. Rajendran Nair and that company has been
closed, however, Mr. Rajendran Nair submits that he is not the
owner or the Ex-Director of Fresh Pay IT Solutions and the
summons were sent on his mobile and he never accepted them. He
does agree that he did not tell the IO that he does not accept the
summons but he also submits that he will not be able to represent
the company since he has nothing to do with the affairs of the
company in the present or in the past. The IO submits that Mr.
Abhilash Pillai was the Director of M/s Fresh Pay as per the
records of the ROC. Mr. Abhilash Pillai submits that he had
resigned from the said company and thus, he will not be able to
represent the company. He submits that he will bring the relevant
record on the next date of hearing to show that he has already
resigned.
Copy of chargesheet has been supplied to all the
accused persons in the form of pendrive. Ld. Counsel for accused
Anita submits that he needs a hard copy of the chargesheet. The
IO submits that since the chargesheet is voluminous, he will have
to apply to Delhi Government for sanction which will need some
time. He shall make an effort and supply the chargesheet within
03 weeks from today to Ld. Counsel for accused Anita.
IO has filed the hash value certification alongwith a
pendrive. The same are taken on record.
Perusal of record reveals that chargesheet was filed
against accused Anita and Anoop Mittal without arrest. In view of
Contd…..3/-
-- 2 of 3 --
-3-
this and considering the circumstances of this case as well as the
judgments of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in Court on its
own motion v CBI, (2004) SCC OnLine Del 53 and Court on its
own motion v State, (2018) SCC OnLine Del 12306 (approved by
the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Siddharth v State of UP, (2022) 1
SCC 676), accused Anita and Anoop Mittal are admitted to regular
bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/-. Accused persons shall furnish a
personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each alongwith one
surety each in the like amount. Bail bonds have been furnished on
behalf of accused Anita. IO shall verify the bail bonds and file his
report on or before the next date of hearing.
Accused Anoop Mittal seeks some time to furnish
his bail bonds. Time granted till the next date of hearing.
List for consideration on the aspect of representation
of M/s Fresh Pay IT Solutions, scrutiny of documents, filing of
bail bonds on behalf of accused Anoop Mittal and filing of
verification report of bail bonds with respect to accused Anita on
19.11.2026.
(Dr. Ruchi Aggarwal Asrani)
Special Judge (PC Act)(ACB)-02
Rouse Avenue District Courts
New Delhi/26.09.2026
-- 3 of 3 --