Full Order Text
Interim Order 15 · 12 Aug 2026 · CNR DLCT110012452025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CNR No. DLCT11-001245-2025 CC No. 40/2025 State Vs. Rajendran Nair & Ors. FIR No.10/2022 P.S. Anti Corruption Branch 12.08.2026 O R D E R This order will decide the point of cognizance. Arguments were heard on the point of cognizance. Perused the chargesheet filed by the IO alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 7/8/13 (1) (c)/ 13(1) (d)/ 13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 406/409/420/120B/34 of Indian Penal Code by accused persons namely Rajendran Nair, Gopi Kumar Kedia, Abhilash Vasukuttan Pillai, Naresh Kumar, Anita, M/s Fresh Pay IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd., M/s Aurrum e Payments Pvt. Ltd. and Anoop Mittal. The IO stated that the FIR No.10/2022 was registered on the basis of the complaint filed by complainant Ms. Pooja Jain, CVO, Delhi Jal Board and the present case pertains to embezzlement of DJB money by private persons/agency engaged by Corporation Bank (Now Union Bank of India). He further stated that Delhi Jal Board (DJB) had awarded the work of “Setting up Automative bill payment collection machines at different locations in different DJB offices” as decided by the Board for facilitating DJB consumers in bill payments through various modes of payments including cash and cheques to the Corporation Bank vide work order no. 05 dated 12.06.2012/Contract Agreement No. 02 dated 11.07.2012 initially for a period of three years up to 10.07.2015 which was extended from time to time, however, while the case was being processed for further CC No. 40/25 in FIR No. 10/22 State vs. Rajendran Nair & Ors. Page 1 of 4 -- 1 of 4 -- extension of contract agreement beyond 10.10.2019 on the existing terms and conditions and enhanced transaction charges, irregularities regarding delayed deposition/non-deposition of cash by the bank during the period the contract was alive i.e. 11.07.2012 to 10.10.2019 and also during the period w.e.f. 11.10.2019 to 19.03.2020 when the collection through e-kiosks was stopped by DJB, were observed. The matter was immediately brought to the notice of the bank to deposit the amount collected from the e-kiosks but the bank failed to deposit the same in the bank account of Delhi Jal Board. The matter was reported to the Vigilance Department of Delhi Jal Board and the Vigilance Department after scrutinizing the documents seized from the Revenue Department of Delhi Jal board, concluded that the preliminary investigation into the matter revealed embezzlement of Delhi Jal Board funds amounting to Rs.20 Crores and above by private persons in connivance with Corporation Bank and DJB officials. He further stated that the contract was valid up to 10.10.2019, however, Aurrum e payment Pvt. Ltd. collected the amount till March, 2020 and funds were transferred from Federal Bank account of Aurrum e payment Pvt. Ltd. to sister concerns of Rajendran Nair namely M/s Aurum Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., M/s Cerva India Pvt. Ltd., M/s Winton Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Aurm Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., his relatives and many more. They had made payments like rent, salary of employees of Aurrum e Payment and Fresh pay IT Solution, other expenses of companies from this very account of Federal Bank. He also stated that as per contract, there must be regular reconciliation but none of the parties i.e. Delhi Jal Board, the then Corporation Bank (now Union Bank of India), Fresh Pay IT Solutions and Aurrum e payment reconciled the amount. CC No. 40/25 in FIR No. 10/22 State vs. Rajendran Nair & Ors. Page 2 of 4 -- 2 of 4 -- IO also stated that accused Rajenderan K. Nair, Abhilash Pillai and Gopi Kedia failed to give any satisfactory reasonable reply to the queries raised by him and therefore, they were arrested in the present case and at their instance, he seized the original contract along with other related documents from the office of Aurrum e Payments Pvt. Ltd. documentary evidence. Thereafter, at the instance of accused Gopi Kedia, he took printouts of emails and two enclosures which were amongst Rajendran Nair, Gopi Kedia and Anoop Mittal wherein Rajendran Nair was giving instructions and Gopi had sent the detailed statement regarding Delhi Jal Board fund collected and in some mails, there is mention about payments to accused Naresh Kumar, the then Deputy Director, Delhi Jal Board upon which, he called and interrogated him but accused Naresh Kumar failed to give any satisfactory reply and therefore, he arrested him. IO also stated that he also examined Mr. Chandan Dubey, Director of M/s Aurrum e Payments Pvt. Ltd. who disclosed that he was working as a field staff in M/s Professional Visa Services Pvt. Ltd., another company owned by accused Rajendran Nair; that he had nothing to do with M/s Aurrum e Payments Pvt. Ltd. and Gopi Kedia and Abhilash Pillai took his signatures and that he is a poor person and never even filed IT return. IO also stated that accused Anita was UDC/ASO in Delhi Jal Board and responsible for reconciliation of Delhi Jal Board funds collected at Kiosks installed by Corporation Bank through its sub contractor for collection of Delhi Jal Board bill payments. Accused Subha Gopinathan is present residing in Moscow, Russia and she was authorised signatory in bank account of M/s Aurrum e Payment and was director in the said company. CC No. 40/25 in FIR No. 10/22 State vs. Rajendran Nair & Ors. Page 3 of 4 -- 3 of 4 -- Ld. PP for the State submitted that there is sufficient material against the accused persons and accused companies regarding embezzlement of government funds by private persons and government servants. Further, sanction order dated 13.05.2025 under Section 19 of PC Act, 1988 against accused Naresh Kumar passed by Ms. Shilpa Shinde, IAS, CEO, Delhi Jal Board, Varunalaya, Karol Bagh, Chief Secretary, Delhi and order dated 12.06.2025 against accused Anita passed by Sh. Ravi Dhawan, IAS, Member (Admin), Delhi Jal Board, Varunalaya, Karol Bagh, Delhi have been filed along with the chargesheet. Perusal of the chargesheet including the documents filed therein and the statements of the witnesses shows that there is sufficient material for this court to take cognizance of the above mentioned offence and to proceed against the accused persons namely Rajendran Nair, Gopi Kumar Kedia, Abhilash Vasukuttan Pillai, Naresh Kumar, Ms. Anita, M/s Fresh Pay IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd., M/s Aurrum e Payments Pvt. Ltd. and Anoop Mittal. Accordingly, I hereby take cognizance of the offence under section 7/8/13(1)(c)/7(13)(1)(d)/13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 406/409/420/120B/34 of Indian Penal Code. (Dr. Ruchi Aggarwal Asrani) Special Judge (PC Act)(ACB)-02 Rouse Avenue District Courts New Delhi/12.08.2026 CC No. 40/25 in FIR No. 10/22 State vs. Rajendran Nair & Ors. Page 4 of 4 -- 4 of 4 --
