Order 10

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 1
Ct. 32/2024
ECIR/HQ/08/2020/2020
CNR no. DLCT11-001235-2024
U/s. 45 r/w 44 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 for commission
of offence u/s. 3 and punishable u/s. 4 of PMLA
DoE Vs. Venugoapal Nandlal Dhoot @V.N. Dhoot & Ors.
04.11.2025
Present: Mr. N. K. Matta, Ld. SPP for DoE along with Mr. Faizan
Advocate, and Mr. Satyaveer Singh, AD, ED
(physically).
For A-1 Venugopal Nandlal Dhoot @ V. N. Dhoot, Counsel Sh.
Sandeep S. Ladda
(physically).
For A-2 Pradip Kumar Nandlal Dhoot @ P. N. Dhoot, Counsel
Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Mr. Rohit Pitti and Ms. Annada Dubey
(Physically), whereas Counsel Sh. Navjot Singh
(VC).
For A-3 Raj Kumar Nandlal Dhoot @ R. N. Dhoot, Counsel Sh.
Sandeep S. Ladda
(physically).
For A-4 M/s Videocon Industries Ltd., Counsel Sh. Shantanu Tyagi
who appears on behalf of Insolvency Resolution Professional
(IRP) (VC).
None for A-5 M/s Videocon Oil Ventures Ltd. (Despite service of
the notice through the Resolution Professional on 25.07.2025.)
None for A-6 M/s Videocon Hydrocarbon Holdings Ltd. @ M/s
VHHL.
None for A-7 M/s Venus Corporation Ltd.
None for A-8 M/s Eagle Corporation Ltd.
None for A-9 M/s Quadrant Corporation Ltd.
None for A-10 M/s Paramount Global Ltd.
None for A-11 M/s TGDC Guangdong Display Devices Co. Ltd.
None for A-12 M/s Videocon Realty & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. @
M/s VRIL.
None for A-13 M/s VDC Technologies SPA @ M/s VDC
Ct. 32/2024
Page 1 of 3
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Time sought by Ld. SPP for DoE to file written
submissions/response qua written submissions already placed on record
by proposed A1 to A3.
So far as service of proposed A6 to A13 are concerned, they
could not be served with the notices for today. A status report is filed by
DoE stating that the e-mail id of these proposed accused could not be
found and that otherwise for service of notice through proper channel,
MHA would require 12 weeks atleast and therefore in the entire process
DoE would require a longer period.
However, in the status report filed today, DoE also request that
A1 and A2 be directed to receive notices on behalf of proposed A6 to
A13.
During hearing, Ld. Counsel for A2 points out that A12 is a
company based in India and its e-mail id is already available in the
prosecution complaint itself. Yet A12 has not been served through e-
mail.
At this stage, Ld. SPP for DoE submits that DoE shall serve
A12 for the next date of hearing and DoE wishes to file another detailed
and proper application as to why A6 to A11 and A13, all of which are
based abroad be served through A1 & A2.
Let details of A12 company be obtained from the website of
ROC/Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and A12 be served through all
modes with the notice U/s 223 of BNSS, for the next date of hearing.
So far as A6 to A11 & A13 are concerned, let the desired
application be filed within ten days with advance copy to A1 & A2. A1
& A2 shall be at liberty to give response to the said application within a
Ct. 32/2024
Page 2 of 3
-- 2 of 3 --
3
week of receipt of copies with advance copy to DoE.
DoE to also file written submissions, within ten days with
advance copy to A1 to A3.
Put up on 25.11.2025 at 11.30 AM for, service of A12, for
filing of written submissions of DoE qua A1 & A3, and arguments on
the application proposed to be filed by DoE qua service of other
proposed accused.
(Dig Vinay Singh)
Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)-09
(MPs/MLAs cases), RACC,
New Delhi / 04.11.2025 (r)
Ct. 32/2024
Page 3 of 3
-- 3 of 3 --