Interim Order 7

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE (PC ACT) (ACB)-02,
ROUSE AVENUE DISTRICT COURTS, NEW DELHI
Presided by:- Jay Thareja, DHJS
CC No.68/2023
State v Rampal Verma & Anr.
FIR No.28/2015
PS Anti-Corruption Branch
05.06.2024
Present : Sh. Girish Giri, Ld. PP for the State.
Sh. Kishor Kumar Mishra and Sh. Manish Khea, Ld. Advocates for
the accused alongwith the accused.
IO, ACP A. K. Singh is present.
In view of the judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Court
on its own motion v CBI, (2004) SCC OnLine Del 53 and Court on its own motion
v State, (2018) SCC OnLine Del 12306 (approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in Siddharth v State of UP, (2022) 1 SCC 676), the accused, Sh. Rampal Verma,
who has been charge-sheeted by the State without arrest, is admitted to bail
subject to furnishing of bail bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/-. The bail application
of the accused, Sh. Rampal Verma stands disposed off, accordingly.
The personal bond furnished by the accused, Sh. Rampal Verma is
accepted till the next date of hearing. The surety bond furnished by the accused,
Sh. Rampal Verma of the surety, Sh. Rajbir is rejected because the surety who
claims himself to be a friend of the accused, Sh. Rampal Verma has been unable
to tell the names of wife and children of the accused, Sh. Rampal Verma and has
informed that till date, he has not even gone to the house of the accused, Sh.
Rampal Verma. The accused is directed to furnish a fresh surety bond on or
before the next date of hearing, without fail.
The copy of the charge-sheet, consisting of 158 pages as well as
the CD of the e-challan, has been supplied to the accused, Sh. Rampal Verma.
List for furnishing of surety bond by the accused, Sh. Rampal Verma
and for scrutiny of documents, on 02.08.2024.
(JAY THAREJA)
Special Judge (PC Act)(ACB)-02
Rouse Avenue District Courts, New Delhi
05.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --