Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 11

CNR DLCT11000686202310 May 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 11 · 10 May 2024 · CNR DLCT110006862023

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE (PC ACT) (ACB)02,
ROUSE AVENUE DISTRICT COURTS, NEW DELHI
Presided by: Jay Thareja, DHJS
CC No.55/2023
State v Devender Kumar & Anr.
FIR No.55/2014
PS AntiCorruption Branch
10.05.2024
At 10:06 am.
Present : Sh. Girish Giri, Ld. PP for the State.
Accused, Sh. Devender Kumar in person.
Sh. Salman Hashmi, Ld. Advocate for the accused, Sh. Subhash
Sharma alongwith the said accused.
IO, Inspector Ranvir Singh is present.
At request of the accused, Sh. Devender Kumar, the matter is
passed over.
(JAY THAREJA)
Special Judge (PC Act)(ACB)02
Rouse Avenue District Courts, New Delhi
10.05.2024
At 10:35 am.
Present : Sh. Girish Giri, Ld. PP for the State.
Sh. Akash Kumar, Ld. Advocate for the accused, Sh. Devender
Kumar alongwith the said accused.
Sh. Salman Hashmi, Ld. Advocate for the accused, Sh. Subhash
Sharma alongwith the said accused.
IO, Inspector Ranvir Singh is present.
In view of the judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Court
on its own motion v CBI, (2004) SCC OnLine Del 53 and Court on its own motion
v State, (2018) SCC OnLine Del 12306 (approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in Siddharth v State of UP, (2022) 1 SCC 676), both the accused persons, who
-- 1 of 2 --
have been chargesheeted by the State without arrest, are admitted to bail
subject to furnishing of bail bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/. Their bail
applications stand disposed off, accordingly.
The bail bonds furnished by the accused, Sh. Devender Kumar are
accepted as the surety is a government servant and claims to have sufficient
control over the said accused. The original documents of the surety have been
seen and returned. Upon inquiry, the surety has submitted that he is retiring in
June 2024. He is directed to ensure that a copy of his Pension Payment Order is
filed in this Court, latest by the end of August 2024.
The bail bonds furnished by the accused, Sh. Subhash Sharma are
accepted as the surety is a retired government servant and claims to have
sufficient control over the said accused. The original documents of the surety
have been seen and returned.
The copy of the chargesheet, consisting of 233 pages as well as
the CD of the echallan, has been supplied to both the accused.
List for scrutiny of documents, on 16.07.2024.
(JAY THAREJA)
Special Judge (PC Act)(ACB)02
Rouse Avenue District Courts, New Delhi
10.05.2024
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.