Order 55

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CBI V. Abhishek Gupta & Ors.
RC-048 2024 S 0008
CBI No. 36/2025
07.01.2026
Present: Sh. Prashant Kumar Sharma Ld. Sr. PP for CBI.
Accused Abhishek Gupta (A-1), Accused Deshpal
Singh (A-2), Accused Parvinder Singh (A-3), Accused
Sarabjit Singh (A-4), accused Tajinder Singh (A-5),
Accused Harvinder Singh (A-6) , Accused Arnav Kumar
Datta (A-7), Accused Udai Vir Singh (A-8), Accused
Ved Pal(A-9) and Accused Ashok Narang (A-10) are
present on bail.
Sh. Anirudh Krishan Gandhi and Sh. Abhishek Kurian,
Ld. Counsels for A-1, A-2 & A-10
Sh. Jatin Yadav, Sh. Daksh Gupta, Sh. Parimal Bhatia
and Sh. Kaushal Kait, Ld. Counsels for A-3, A-4, A-5,
A-6.
Ms. Ritu Singh Mann and Sh. Sandeep Chauhan, Ld.
Counsels for A-8.
Sh. Bharat Chugh and Sh. Maanish Choudhary, Ld.
Counsels for A-9.
Sh. Abhijit Anand, Ld. Counsel on behalf of J. Dalvin
Suresh, father of deceased Nevin J Dalvin. (through VC)
Ms. Vanshita, Ld. Counsel for victim Rajender Yadav
Father of Sherya Yadav.
IA No. 42/26
An application u/s 230 BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the
counsel for the Victim Nevin J Dalvin for supply of unrelied
documents as mentioned in supplementary chargesheet, relied and
-- 1 of 4 --
unrelied documents which has been supplied to all the other parties
except the instant victim. Copy of the application be handed over from
the court record to the Ld. Sr. PP. Put up on 08.01.2026 for
reply/consideration.
IA 43/26
An application seeking release of fixed deposit receipt
furnished in terms of orders dated 17.11.2025 and 20.11.2025 has
been moved on behalf of accused/applicant Harvinder Singh. Copy of
the application supplied. Put up on 08.01.2026 for reply/consideration.
IA 35 /25
Ld. Counsel for the victim Nevin Dalvin has filed the copy of
the order dated 09.12.2025 of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, as per
which the victim/complainant has been granted liberty to seek
documents of the present case in accordance with law. Ld. Counsel
for the victim has stated that he has received all the documents
relating to the chargesheet as well as supplementary chargesheet.
However, hard copy of some of the documents are not legible and he
has not received the soft copy of some of the documents.
Ld. Sr. PP for CBI states that he would ask the IO to appear
before the court and supply all the copies of the illegible documents
and for that purpose the counsel for the victim may be directed to
appear in person to check the documents as well as give his
satisfaction in regard to the documents.
In regard to the document case diary i.e. D-33, which is part of
the relied upon documents, Ld. Sr. PP states that he had already
-- 2 of 4 --
supplied the documents to all the parties and would again supply a
copy to the counsel for the victim tomorrow.
Ld. Counsel for the Victim states that he may be provided all
the unrelied documents by the CBI. Ld. Sr. PP has stated that as per
law, only relied upon documents are to be supplied and they have also
supplied list of unrelied documents. Further as per directions of the
court vide order dated 13.11.2025, they have already allowed all the
parties to inspect the unrelied documents and the court may direct
them to produce the documents but the parties cannot claim all the
unrelied documents as a matter of right at this stage.
Ld. Counsel for the victim states that the court should not
proceed to hear the arguments on charge till he is given all the
documents including the unrelied documents and should not allow
even the prosecution to start the arguments on charge.
Ld. Sr. PP for CBI states that they have already supplied all the
relevant documents and as per law have also supplied the list of
unrelied documents. Complainant was also allowed an opportunity to
inspect the unrelied documents as per the order dated 13.11.2025.
Ld. Counsel for the accused persons state that the trial should
not be delayed and the arguments on charge may kindly be proceeded
so that the trial is not delayed and complainant can always
compliment the arguments of prosecution after they receive the
documents tomorrow.
In the interest of justice and balancing the interest of the parties
as well as accused persons, arguments on charge can be started.
Prosecution to open the arguments and complainant/applicant be
provided all clear copies and will also be granted opportunity to
address their arguments after prosecution complete their arguments.
-- 3 of 4 --
Ld. Counsel for victim Nevin Dalvin states that he may be
granted time to argue on charge and requested the date on 09.01.2026.
Ld. Sr. PP for CBI advanced part arguments on charge.
IO and Ld. Counsel for the applicant to appear in person on
next date for compliance regarding the illegible/incomplete
documents.
Put up for further arguments on charge on behalf of CBI and
for pending applications on 08.01.2026 (date already fixed), on
09.01.2026 on behalf of victim and w.e.f 12.01.2026 to 17.01.2026
(dates already fixed) on behalf of accused persons as per their
convenience.
(Dinesh Bhatt)
Principal District & Sessions Judge-
cum-Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI),
Rouse Avenue District Court
New Delhi/07.01.2026
-- 4 of 4 --