Interim Order 65

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CBI V. Abhishek Gupta & Ors.
RC-048 2024 S 0008
CBI No. 36/2025
14.01.2026
Present: Sh. Saket Srivastava, Ld. PP for CBI alongwith Sh
Ankit Sharma, HIO.DSP, CBI SC-1.
Accused Abhishek Gupta (A-1), Accused Deshpal Singh
(A-2), Accused Parvinder Singh (A-3), Accused Sarabjit
Singh (A-4), accused Tajinder Singh (A-5),
Accused Harvinder Singh (A-6) and Accused Ashok
Narang (A-10) are present on bail (through VC).
Accused Arnav Kumar Datta (A-7), Accused no. 8 Udai
Vir Singh and Accused Ved Pal(A-9) are present on bail.
Sh. Anirudh Krishan Gandhi Ld. Counsel for A-1, A-2
& A-10 (through VC).
Sh. Jatin Yadav, Ld. Counsel for A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6
(Through VC).
Sh. Gourav and Sh. Abhishek, Ld. Counsels for A-7.
Ms. Ritu Singh Mann, Ld. Counsel for A-8 (Through
VC)
Sh. Pulkit Dahiya, Ld. Counsel for A-9.
Sh. Abhijit Anand, Ld. Counsel on behalf of J. Dalvin
Suresh, father of deceased Nevin J Dalvin (Through
VC).
IA No. 42/26
This is an application u/s 230 BNSS, 2023 filed by the counsel
for the Victim Nevin J Dalvin for supply of unrelied documents as
mentioned in supplementary chargesheet as well as soft copy of
supplementary chargesheet, relied and unrelied document, which has
been supplied to all the other parties except the instant victim.
Ld. Counsel for the applicant/victim has stated that they have
-- 1 of 4 --
already received the all documents including soft copy of the
supplementary chargesheet and all the relied upon documents filed in
the case.
Ld. Counsel for victim further states that he has received the
list of unrelied documents, however no unrelied documents have been
provided and that he was allowed to inspect the unrelied documents
but CBI did allow him.
Ld. Sr. P.P. submits that only list of documents has to be
supplied which is already supplied and no unrelied documents are to
be supplied at this stage and Ld. Counsel for victim came with 6
associates which was a huge number and they cannot allow so many
people together to inspect the documents. However, they were always
willing to allow reasonable number of people to inspect the
documents.
Ld. counsel for victim has stated that there are large number of
documents and therefore, it was impossible for him to examine the
documents within short period and therefore, he had taken 5 associates
alongwith him.
In the interest of justice, Ld. Counsel for victim is allowed to
take two of his associates to accompany him for inspection of unrelied
documents with the CBI on 16.01.2026 from 10.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.
In view of the same, nothing more survives in the application
and the application IA No.42 of 2025 is disposed off.
IA 46/2026
This is an application filed on behalf of CBI for taking on
record additional witness Shri Prashant Ramdas whose report is
already stated to be on record.
Ld. Counsel for accused no.8 Udai Vir Singh states that the
witness is neither relevant nor report is shown to be connected with
the case in question. Therefore, the application may not be allowed.
-- 2 of 4 --
Ld. Counsel for victim J. Dalvin Suresh also states that he has
objection to the application relating to the contents wherein the height
of the building has been mentioned.
No other accused persons have objected to the application.
In view of the fact that the document i.e. inspection report is
already on record and the witness is to substantiate the report which at
this stage seems to be relevant. Therefore, the application is allowed.
Same be taken on record.
IA 35 /25
This is an application on behalf of victim J. Dalvin Suresh
(father of deceased Nevin Dalvin) u/s 230 BNSS (previously 207
Cr.P.C.).
I.O. has stated that the CCTV footage of the Rau’s IAS Study
Circle and Delhi Police Pink Booth/ Police beat were seized by Delhi
Police on the same day of the incident in question and sent to CFSL.
Later the investigation was handed over to CBI. The CCTV footage
which was available from the DVR of Rau’s IAS Study Circle and
Pink Booth relating to the incident have already been supplied to the
victim and accused persons.
In regard to the CCTV footage of HDFC Bank, Chahal
Academy and Unisex Salon I.O. stated that they have already filed the
same on record and they would clarify the factual position of the same
by tomorrow. Be listed on 15.01.2026.
On joint request of parties, put up for consideration of the
pending applications and for arguments on charge on 15.01.2026 to
17.01.2026 (dates already fixed).
Ld. Counsels for the accused persons state that the accused
persons may be allowed to appear through VC.
Accused persons are allowed to appear through VC on the next date of
hearing i.e. 15.01.2026.
-- 3 of 4 --
Victim J. Dalvin Suresh (Father of the deceased Nevin Dalvin)
is directed to appear through VC on 15.01.2026.
(Dinesh Bhatt)
Principal District & Sessions Judge-
cum-Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI),
Rouse Avenue District Court
New Delhi/14.01.2026
-- 4 of 4 --