Full Order Text
Interim Order 118 · 28 Jul 2026 · CNR DLCT110004192025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CBI V. Abhishek Gupta & Ors. RC-048 2024 S 0008 CBI No. 36/2025 IA No. 55/26 28.07.2026 Present: Sh. Satish Garg, Ld. Sr. PP for CBI. Sh. Anirudh K. Gandhi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant/A-10 Ashok Narang (through VC). 1. This is an application filed on behalf of applicant/A-10 Ashok Narang seeking permission to travel to Australia during the period from 03.08.2026 to 03.11.2026. 2. Reply on behalf of CBI has been filed and copy of the same is supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the applicant. 3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant Ashok Narang wishes to travel to Australia from 03.08.2026 to 03.11.2026 to visit her daughter at her residence 2 Boudicca Drive, Forrestdale, Perth, WA 6112. It is also stated that applicant was granted bail vide order dated 07.07.2025 as per which he requires to obtain prior permission for foreign travel. It is further submitted that since grant of bail on 07.07.2025, there has not been a single allegation of breach of any condition imposed by the court. The applicant has remained available to CBI and this court whenever required. Applicant also undertakes to remain available in connection with the present proceedings throughout the period of travel. -- 1 of 4 -- 4. Ld. Senior Public Prosecutor appearing for CBI had submitted that the Ministry of External Affairs issued GSR 570 (E) dated 25.08.1993, in order to give relief to such applicants against whom criminal proceedings are pending before any Court of law in India but who need to travel abroad for some urgent business/ exceptional circumstances. It is further contented by Ld. Senior PP that accused has sought permission citing reasons which do not appear to fall under the category of urgent or exceptional circumstances as contemplated under the relevant rules and notification. The accused is facing serious criminal proceedings before this Hon’ble court, and if permitted to travel aboard, there exits a genuine apprehension that he may flee from India and may not return, thereby hampering the ongoing trial and the due process of law. 5. I have heard the Ld. Counsel for applicant and Ld. Sr. P.P. for CBI and have also gone through the records. 6. In the present case, it is apparent on perusal of record that the charge sheet in the present case was filed and cognizance of offences under sections 105, 61 (2) of BNS, 2023 was taken vide order dated 04.12.2024 and the applicant was granted regular bail vide orders dated 07.07.2025. 7. It is apparent from the reply filed by the prosecution as well as from the record that after grant of bail to the applicant, the applicant has never been accused of having attempted to avoid joining the investigation or had not cooperated with the investigations or had tried to flee from the country. However, -- 2 of 4 -- taking into consideration the apprehension of the investigating agency of the accused fleeing from justice, a balance needs to be drawn between the apprehension of CBI of applicant fleeing from justice viz-a-viz right of applicant to travel abroad. 8. In view thereof permission is granted to applicant Ashok Narang to travel to Australia for 45 days from 03.08.2026 to 16.09.2026 subject to following conditions:- (i) That he shall furnish the itinerary of his visit to this court. (ii) That he will not try to influence the witnesses if any, in the country that he is visiting, (iii) Applicant shall report his arrival to India to this Court immediately on his return i.e. within a period of two days. (iv) He shall not visit any other country during the said period. (v) He shall submit complete address of his stay/copy of tickets along with the active mobile number in Australia, Perth to the IO/HIO through Ld. P.P. before his departure. (vi) He shall furnish additional FDR in the sum of Rs.7 lakhs in his name prior to his departure and -- 3 of 4 -- shall also furnish an NOC from his surety in the Court. It is clarified that the same shall be forfeited to the State in case any of the information furnished by the applicant is found to be incorrect as per verification, if any, at the end of the CBI, any state. (vii) In no eventuality, his request for extension for staying abroad shall be entertained. (viii) This permission shall be subject to any other applicable rules and shall not be deemed as directions to any authority except for showing the permission from this court only. The present application is accordingly disposed off. Copy of this order be given dasti to the applicant as well as to the Senior PP for CBI. (Dinesh Bhatt) Principal District & Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI), Rouse Avenue District Court New Delhi/28.07.2026 -- 4 of 4 --
