Full Order Text
Final Order 2 · 18 May 2023 · CNR DLCT110003932023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: -1- Bail Matter no. 89/2023 State vs. Umesh FIR No. 04/2023 PS: ACB U/s 7 of POC Act r/w Section 120-B IPC 18.05.2023 Present : Ms. Purnima Gupta, Ld. Chief PP for State. Sh. K. C. Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. IO/Insp. Virendra Singh Chaudhary in person. Reply is filed. Copy supplied. 1. This is an application for grant of bail U/s 439 Cr.P.C., as filed on behalf of abovenamed applicant/accused. 2. Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused argued that applicant/accused is in JC since 23.03.2023 and has been falsely implicated in present case. It has been submitted that as per allegation, applicant was posted at Impounding Pit, Sector- 22, Dwarka and he was caught red handed while accepting bribe of Rs.1000/- for releasing the vehicle of the complainant. Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused vehemently contended that as per prosecution case, co-accused persons who were posted as Naib Court as Dwarka Courts Complex initially demanded bribe of Rs.3000/-, but it is unexplained why the alleged bribe of Rs.1000/- was accepted by the applicant/accused, although the demand was of Rs.3000/-. It has been submitted that co- accused Vedpal having similar role has already been granted bail, therefore applicant/accused is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. Ld. Counsel for applicant further argued that applicant is ready to abide by any condition, imposed by the Court. -- 1 of 4 -- -2- 3. Per contra, bail application is opposed by Ld. Chief PP for State while arguing that the applicant/accused was caught red handed while accepting bribe of Rs.1000/- from the complainant. It has been submitted that applicant alongwith co- accused persons were running a syndicate to demand bribe for releasing the vehicles even after deposit of fine imposed by the Court, from the persons who were challaned by the Transport Department. 4. In brief, the facts of case are that complainant is a registered owner of Swift Dzire having registration no. HR 55AF 9062. His driver Kishan Pal was challaned by the staff of Delhi Transport Enforcement on 20.03.2023 at about 09:40 pm for not having fitness, permit and driving license and his car was impounded. On 21.03.2023, his driver Kishan Pal went to the Ahlmad room of Court no.314, Dwarka Courts for disposal of his challan, where the officials of Transport Department took the challan slip from him and told that he has to pay Rs.7000/- in total. Kishan Pal informed the complainant about this telephonically. Thereupon, complainant went to the Court, where his driver Kishan Pal told him that although Court imposed a fine of Rs.4000/-, but the officials of Transport Department sitting in Ahlmad room, were demanding Rs.7000/- and without payment of Rs.7000/-, they are not giving the fine receipt. He alongwith his driver also tried to take the fine receipt, but the officials of Transport Department demanded Rs.7000/- from him also and when he asked that court has imposed fine of Rs.4000/-, why they were demanding Rs.7000/-, on which, they replied that his fine as per challan was for about Rs.30-35000/-, but they got it reduced for which, he -- 2 of 4 -- -3- has to give extra money. Thereupon, complainant informed about these facts to one Advocate, Sh. Pratik Saxena, on which, he accompanied him and thereupon, they handed over him the fine receipt of Rs.4000/-, but told that mere fine receipt would not do anything and that vehicle will be released as per their wish only. Thereafter, at about 03:30 pm, complainant alongwith his driver went to Sector-22, where his vehicle was impounded, but the staff posted there asked him to show one or other document and despite showing the documents, they refused to release the vehicle. In the meantime, at about 05:30 pm, one of the official who made demand of extra Rs.3000/- in the Court also reached there and asked them to give Rs.3000/- and to get release their vehicle. Thereupon, the staff who was sitting on window, Sector-22 called them towards behind where the person who met them in Court was also standing and the window staff official told the Court official that he should have taken money from them initially. 5. Thereafter, complainant went to ACB, pursuant to which, a raiding team was constituted and at first instance raiding team went to Ahlmad room of Court no. 314 of Dwarka Court alongwith complainant and panch witness, but out of two officials of Transport Department, one of them who made demand of Rs.3000/- for giving fine receipt was stated to be on leave and the another asked the complainant to go at Pit where his work will be done. Thereafter, raiding team went to the Parking Pit, Transport Department, Sector-22, Dwarka, where Vedpal, who was posted as Inspector Enforcement Department asked the complainant in presence of panch witness that his vehicle shall not be released on the strength of fine receipt and -- 3 of 4 -- -4- documents and that he has to give money in a room of right side corner and co-accused Aditya Kumar also asked the complainant “ bina paise diye kaam nahi hoga, paise to dene padenge” and thereupon applicant/accused Umesh was apprehended red handed while accepting bribe of Rs.1000/-. 6. Keeping in view of the fact that the applicant/ accused is in JC since 23.03.2023 and co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail, applicant is admitted to bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like amount subject to the following conditions :- (i) That during the period of bail, applicant/accused shall not try to contact or influence, directly or indirectly, any of the witnesses of present case and shall not tamper with evidence; (ii) That applicant/accused shall not misuse the liberty of bail by indulging in commission of similar offences in future; (iii) That applicant/accused shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court; (iv) That applicant/accused shall intimate the Court in case of change of address. 7. Accordingly, bail application stands disposed off. 8. A copy of order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused as well as IO. (Sanjeev Kumar Malhotra) Special Judge, PC Act (ACB-01) RADC, New Delhi. 18.05.2023 -- 4 of 4 --
