Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 6

CNR DLCT11000243202605 Sept 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 6 · 05 Sept 2026 · CNR DLCT110002432026

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR No. DLCT11-000243-2026
CC No. 23/2026
FIR No. 114/2008
PS : Janakpuri
(Investigated by Crime Branch)
State Vs Ct. (now HC) Devender Kumar Kaushik & Anr.
05.09.2026
Present : Sh. Neeraj Madhup, Ld. Substitute Addl. PP for
State.
Accused Devender Kumar Kaushik (A-1) and
Ajay Kumar (A-2) are present.
Sh. Anand Ranjan, Sh. Vikash Pachauri, and
Sh. Jeetu Singh, Ld. Counsels for A-1 and A-2.
IO/ACP Pankaj Arora is present.
Heard. Perused.
Regular PP is stated to be on leave today.
Two separate applications for bail are moved on
behalf of the applicants/accused persons. Copies thereof
supplied.
Arguments on the applications heard. Record
perused.
Ld. Counsels for applicants/accused persons have
submitted that applicants/ accused persons are innocent and have
been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted
that the applicants/accused persons are police officials and have
clean antecedents. Besides, it is also submitted that the
applicants/accused persons were not arrested during the
investigation of this case and chargesheet has been filed without
their arrest. On these ground, it is prayed that the
applicants/accused persons may be granted bail.
On the other hand, Ld. Substitute Addl. PP for the
-- 1 of 3 --
state has formally opposed the said bail applications.
Having considered the submissions made on behalf
of both the sides and in view of overall facts and circumstances
of the case, including the fact that chargesheet has been filed in
this case without arrest of the applicants/accused persons, the bail
applications are allowed. Accordingly, the applicants/accused
persons are admitted to bail on their furnishing personal bonds in
the sum of ₹50,000/- each with one surety each in the like
amount, subject to the following conditions:
(i.) That the applicants/accused persons shall not
contact or visit or offer any inducement, threat
or promise, either directly or indirectly, either
to the complainant, or to any other prosecution
witness of the present case, who may be
acquainted with the facts of the present case, so
as to dissuade them from disclosing the correct
and complete facts to the investigating agency/
Court, and shall not tamper with the evidence
in any manner;
(ii.) That the applicants/ accused persons shall not
misuse the liberty of bail by indulging in
commission of similar offence(s) in future;
(iii.) That the applicants/accused persons shall keep
the Investigating Officer/ Court informed about
their respective residential addresses and
mobile phones and shall also inform their fresh
addresses/ mobile numbers, in case of any
change;
-- 2 of 3 --
(iv.) That the applicants/accused persons shall
appear before the Court on each and every date
of hearing; and
(v.) That the applicants/accused persons shall not
leave the country without prior permission of
the Court.
Needless to say that in the event of breach of any of
the aforesaid conditions imposed by the Court, it shall be open
for the State to apply for cancellation of bail being granted to the
applicants/accused persons herein.
Both the bail applications stand disposed off in the
aforesaid terms.
Bail bonds have been furnished on behalf of both
the accused persons. Same are accepted.
Ld. Counsel of both the accused persons, on
instructions, states at Bar that copy of chargesheet and the
documents filed therewith, as were supplied to both the accused
persons on the last date, are complete in all respects.
Put up on 17-10-2026 arguments on the point of
charge.
On request of Ld. Substitute Addl. PP for State,
IO namely ACP Pankaj Arora is bound down for next date, for
his assistance.
(Vidya Prakash)
Special Judge, PC Act (ACB)-01
RACC, New Delhi.
05.09.2026
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.