Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 2

CNR DLCT11000226202125 Aug 2021
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 2 · 25 Aug 2021 · CNR DLCT110002262021

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 1
State Vs. Dinesh Kumar & Ors. FIR No. 11/2016 PS ACB Dated 25.08.2021 Page 1 of 2
State Vs. Dinesh Kumar & Ors.
FIR No. 11/2016
PS ACB
25.08.2021
In view of Order No. 569/RG/DHC/2021 dated 19.08.2021 of
Hon'ble Delhi High Court to resume the physical hearings in the District Courts
in Delhi in graded manner physically on alternate working day, and pursuant to
the roster prepared vide Order no. Power Gaz/RACC/2021/ 18474-18559-C dated
21.08.2021 of Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge-Cum, Special Judge (PC
Act) (CBI), Rouse Avenue Court Complex, New Delhi, the present matter is taken
up through Video Conferencing.
(Through Video Conference)
Present : Sh. Maqsood Ahmad, Ld. Chief Prosecutor for the State.
IO Inspector Braj Mohan.
This is a fresh final report U/s 173 Cr.P.C which was received on
26.07.2021. Ahlmad has reported that physical file has been received. It be
checked and registered.
The soft copy of the file perused. On perusal of chargesheet and
material along with chargesheet it is seen that accused Dinesh Kumar who was
working as Data Entry Operator on contractual basis in the Office of SDM,
Defence Colony, Lajpat Nagar-IV, Delhi, demanded and obtained a bribe amount
of Rs. 2500/- from the complainant Raja Singh for issuance of Partnership Deed
Certificate Form 'C' in the name of M/s Poysha Wind Firm. Accused Rajender
Singh Bansal was working as UDC and was working as Reader of SDM, Defence
Colony, at the relevant time and he was Dealing Assistant of Firms & Societies
Branch. He got approved Note Sheet and got signed Form 'C' from the SDM and
he was custodian of the documents out of which Form 'C' was to be given to the
concerned person only. Instead, Dinesh Kumar obtained the above-mentioned
bribe amount from the complainant on 19.06.2016 and handed over the Form 'C'
to the complainant.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
State Vs. Dinesh Kumar & Ors. FIR No. 11/2016 PS ACB Dated 25.08.2021 Page 2 of 2
As per the case of prosecution, both accused were in connivance
and had conspired. There is sufficient material to take cognizance U/s 7/8 & 13 of
POC Act, 1988 as also Sec. 120 B of IPC. Cognizance taken for those offences.
Accused Dinesh is on bail and accused Rajender Singh is stated to
be on anticipatory bail.
Issue summons to both the accused persons to appear physically and
notice to the sureties for producing the accused in the Court.
Put up on 16.09.2021.
Copy of this order be sent to the Computer Branch. A copy of this order be
supplied to Ld. PP, accused, IO through email/WhatsApp.
(Dig Vinay Singh)
Special Judge (PC Act) ACB-02
Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi
25.08.2021 (r)
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.