Interim Order 15

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE (PC ACT) (ACB)-02,
ROUSE AVENUE DISTRICT COURTS, NEW DELHI
Presided Over by:- Ashish Aggarwal, DHJS
CC No.15/2024
State v Harmenn Sabherwal & Ors.
FIR No.56/2022
PS EOW
13.05.2025
Present : Sh. Vikash Kumar, Ld. Public Prosecutor for State.
Sh. Sandeep Sharma, Ld. Counsel for complainant Sh. Sunil Kaushik
appearing through VC.
Sh. Abhishek Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for complainant Sh. Sunil Kaushik.
Sh. Rahul Shukla, Ld. Counsel for complainant Sh. Shree Ram
appearing through VC.
Accused Harmenn Sabherwal is produced from JC.
Accused Govind Tulshyan with counsel Sh. Gaurav Prakash.
Accused Diprana Tiwari is present.
Sh. Mayank Joshi, Ld. Counsel for accused Trilok Singh appearing
through VC.
Accused Trilok Singh is present.
Accused Mrityunjoy Roy with counsel Sh. Prashant Kumar.
Accused persons Umesh Batra and Pawan Kumar Rai with counsel Sh.
D. K. Pandey.
Accused Vinod Sharma with counsel Sh. Deepak Kumar Gupta.
Sh. Pankaj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for accused Prafulla Kumar Nayak.
Accused Prafulla Kumar Nayak is produced from JC.
ACP Keshav Mathur is present.
Ld. Counsel for accused Prafulla Kumar Nayak is present. He submits that
he requires some more time for scrutiny of documents because he has been recently
engaged.
ACP Keshav Mathur is present on behalf of EOW. ACP Keshav Mathur
submits that ACP Ajay Kumar has been appointed as investigating officer in the present
case. He also submits that further investigation is now going to be carried out into the
-- 1 of 2 --
role of all persons including Nitin Sharma and Harish Goyal. He submits that the case
may be adjourned for the said further investigation to be carried out.
That being so, the case is fixed for scrutiny of documents in respect of
accused Prafulla Kumar Nayak and for further proceedings on 23.07.2025.
IO shall make adequate effort to complete the said further investigation by
the next date. A status report shall also be filed by the next date.
Accused Harmenn Sabherwal submits that he is not being given medical
treatment. He submits that an advocate may be appointed as Amicus Curiae to represent
him since he is not able to afford a privately engaged advocate. At his request, Mr.
Neeraj Goyal, Advocate having office of KP-155, First Floor, Pitampura, Delhi and Mobile
No. 9891489779 is appointed as Amicus Curiae to represent accused Harmenn
Sabherwal. It is explained to the accused that he did not pay any fee to the said advocate
because the fee will be paid him by the government at the prescribed rate. The accused
is also explained that in case he is not satisfied with the services of the advocate, he
shall be at liberty to inform the Court.
Accused Harmenn Sabherwal submits that he may be produced on a date
prior to the next date so that he can consult with the Amicus Curiae and have an
appropriate application filed in the Court. The request is allowed.
Accused Harmenn Sabherwal be produced from JC on 16.05.2025.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Special Judge (PC Act)(ACB)-02
Rouse Avenue District Courts, New Delhi
13.05.2025
-- 2 of 2 --