TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026
Not available
Date: 30-01-2026 Business: Notice issued Next Purpose: MISCELLENOUS Next Hearing Date: 01-06-2026 Date: 01-06-2026 Business: PUT UP FOR ARGUMENTS Next Purpose: ARGUMENT Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2026 Date: 06-08-2026 Business: Appeal Disposed of Nature Of Disposal: APPEAL ALLOWED AND REMAND BACK Disposal Date: 06-08-2026
Filing Number: 61/2026 Filing Date: 27-01-2026 First Hearing Date: 30th January 2026 Decision Date: 06th August 2026 Court Number And Judge: 1-PRESIDING OFFICER - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MCD
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: A.No. 59/26 : Narender Kumar Vs. MCD A.No. 60/26 : Kewal Kishan Chopra Vs. MCD A.No. 61/26 : Rahul Gridhar Vs. MCD A.No. 62/26 : Sunil Kumar Vs. MCD A.No. 63/26 : Manoj Kumar Goyal Vs. MCD 06.08.2026 Present : Ms. Hinu Mahajan, ld counsel for the appellant. Sh. Ashutosh Gupta, ld. counsel for the respondent in appeal no. 59/26 and 61/26. Ms. Rani Prajapati, ld. proxy counsel for Sh. S. Adil…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: A.No. 59/26, 60/26, 61/26, 62/26 & 63/26 01.06.2026 Present : Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for the appellant. Sh. Ashutosh Gupta, ld. counsel for the respondent in appeal no. 59/26 and 61/26. Sh. S. Adil Hussain, Ld counsel for the respondent in 60/26, 62/26 & 63/26. Fresh Vakalatnama filed, same is taken on record. Status report is filed by the MCD in all the matters. Copy supplied. Record has already been submitted. It can be inspected by the counsel for the appellant. An adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant as main counsel Ms. Hinu Mahajan is out of station. Same is opposed. The date of today was given on 30.01.2026 in the presence of the counsel and she should not have gone out of station and should have planned her visit according to the court dates. However, infacts, the adjournment is allowed to cost of Rs. 2,000/- in each appeal to be deposited with the Registry of this tribunal. Put up for arguments on 06.08.2026. Interim orders, if any, to continue till the next date of hearing. (AMIT KUMAR) Addl. District & Sessions Judge P.O.: Appellate Tribunal, MCD 01.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: A.No. 59/26, 60/26, 61/26, 62/26 & 63/26 30.01.2026 Fresh appeal received. It be checked and registered. Present : Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Ld counsel for the appellants. Submissions heard. File perused. Issue notice of interim application(s) as well as appeal to the respondent through concerned Chief Law officer. The Executive Engineer (B) is directed to ensure the presence of the concerned AE(B), who shall appear in person along with the record of the proceedings, status report and reply on next date of hearing. Put up for arguments on interim application(s) and appeal on 01.06.2026. Till next date of hearing, no coercive action be taken against the respective properties of appellants in pursuance of the demolition orders all dated 14.11.2025. However, it is made clear that no encroachment on the public land is protected. The appellant is directed not to raise any further construction in the property in question. (AMIT KUMAR) Addl. District & Sessions Judge P.O.: Appellate Tribunal, MCD 30.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: A.No. 59/26, 60/26, 61/26, 62/26 & 63/26 01.06.2026 Present : Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for the appellant. Sh. Ashutosh Gupta, ld. counsel for the respondent in appeal no. 59/26 and 61/26. Sh. S. Adil Hussain, Ld counsel for the respondent in 60/26, 62/26 & 63/26. Fresh Vakalatnama filed, same is taken on record. Status report is filed by the MCD in all the matters. Copy supplied. Record has already been submitted. It can be inspected by the counsel for the appellant. An adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant as main counsel Ms. Hinu Mahajan is out of station. Same is opposed. The date of today was given on 30.01.2026 in the presence of the counsel and she should not have gone out of station and should have planned her visit according to the court dates. However, infacts, the adjournment is allowed to cost of Rs. 2,000/- in each appeal to be deposited with the Registry of this tribunal. Put up for arguments on 06.08.2026. Interim orders, if any, to continue till the next date of hearing. (AMIT KUMAR) Addl. District & Sessions Judge P.O.: Appellate Tribunal, MCD 01.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: A.No. 59/26, 60/26, 61/26, 62/26 & 63/26 30.01.2026 Fresh appeal received. It be checked and registered. Present : Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Ld counsel for the appellants. Submissions heard. File perused. Issue notice of interim application(s) as well as appeal to the respondent through concerned Chief Law officer. The Executive Engineer (B) is directed to ensure the presence of the concerned AE(B), who shall appear in person along with the record of the proceedings, status report and reply on next date of hearing. Put up for arguments on interim application(s) and appeal on 01.06.2026. Till next date of hearing, no coercive action be taken against the respective properties of appellants in pursuance of the demolition orders all dated 14.11.2025. However, it is made clear that no encroachment on the public land is protected. The appellant is directed not to raise any further construction in the property in question. (AMIT KUMAR) Addl. District & Sessions Judge P.O.: Appellate Tribunal, MCD 30.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
