Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 8

CNR DLCT03007184202505 Feb 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 8 · 05 Feb 2026 · CNR DLCT030071842025

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 2127/25
NIKHIL JAIN Vs. SHARWAN KUMAR
05.02.2026
Proceedings conducted through hybrid mode.
Present: Mr. Anurag Sharma, Mr. Ashish Rana, Mr. Sagar Verma and Mr. Diwakar
Chaurasia, Ld. Counsels for plaintiff.
Mr. Atul Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through Cisco Webex).
Perusal of the file shows that WS alongwith reply to application under Order
39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, supporting affidavit, copy of criminal complaint case and account
statement of the defendant from 24.09.2023 till 05.01.2026 was filed on behalf of the
defendant on 02.02.2026 and the same has been put up with file today. Copy to be supplied
to the plaintiff has also been filed. The same is supplied to Ld. Counsel for plaintiff today in
the court.
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that he will file an appropriate application
for condonation of delay in filing of WS. Allowed.
Perusal of the file shows that an application under Section 12 of Contempt of
Courts Act r/w Section 151 CPC was filed on behalf of the plaintiff on 07.01.2026 and the
same has been put up with file today. Copy of the said application, to be supplied to the
defendant has been filed by Ld. counsel for plaintiff. The same is taken on record and be
supplied to the defendant against acknowledgment. Advance copy of reply be supplied to the
opposite counsel.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the defendant is still disconnecting
the electricity connection and is violating the order passed by this court.
Defendant is directed to appear physically on NDOH to give his statement that
he will not disconnect electricity connection of the suit property.
Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks an adjournment today for advancing
arguments on the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff
on the ground that due to bereavement of his friend, he is not in Delhi. The same is objected
to by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. However, In the interest of justice, the said adjournment is
allowed.
It is made absolutely clear that no further adjournment shall be granted to the
defendant to advance arguments on the abovementioned application.
Interim order to continue till next date of hearing.
List the matter on 19.03.2026 at 2:00 PM.
(Aayushi Saxena)
CJ-03 : Central : THC : Delhi.
05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.