Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: - 1 -
10 CS SCJ 2331/23
DSE ESTATES LTD
Vs.
MAHAMAYA GENRAL FINANCE CO LTD
02.08.2024
Present: Sh. Shalabh Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Ms. Neeta Lodha, AR of plaintiff.
Sh. Lakhmi Chand, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through
VC).
Sh. Mukul Koli, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter received back from Mediation Centre as not settled.
An application has been filed on behalf of defendant for
condonation of delay in filing the written statement. Same is taken on
record.
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that inadvertently the
written statement could not be filed by defendant within the prescribed
period due to the reasons as mentioned in the application and prays that
the application be allowed and the written statement filed by defendant
be taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he has no objection if
the said application is allowed.
In the interest of justice and keeping in view the settled
principle of law that procedure should be used to subserve and advance
the cause of justice, the application filed on behalf of defendant for
condonation of delay in filing the written statement is allowed.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
Accordingly, written statement filed by defendant is taken
on record.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file replication.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he wishes to file
replication to the written statement filed by defendant.
Replication, if any, be filed within 15 days with advance
copy to the opposite party.
Put up for further proceedings on 30.11.2024.
(Umang Joshi)
Civil Judge-04, Central,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
02.08.2024
-- 2 of 2 --