Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

VEER KUMARVsVISHAL GROVER

CNR DLCT030054922025179-Civil Judge
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 25th February 2026

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1658/2025
Registration Date
09 Sept 2025

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1VEER KUMAR

    Respondent

    1. 1VISHAL GROVER

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Specific Relief Act 1963 · Sec PermanentInjunction

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 09-09-2025
    Business: Proceeding have been done.
    Next Purpose: Consideration
    Next Hearing Date: 10-09-2025
    
    Date: 10-09-2025
    Business: Proceeding have been done.
    Next Purpose: Consideration
    Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2025
    
    Date: 19-09-2025
    
    Date: 08-12-2025
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 08-12-2025
    
    Date: 08-12-2025
    Business: Proceeding have been done.
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2026
    
    Date: 14-01-2026
    Business: Proceeding have been done.
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 03-02-2026
    
    Date: 03-02-2026
    Business: Proceeding have been done.
    Next Purpose: Issues
    Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2026
    
    Date: 25-02-2026
    Business: Dismissed
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 25-02-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 5492/2025
    Filing Date: 09-09-2025
    eFiling Number: ADL20230000389C202500077
    eFiling Date: 08-09-2025
    First Hearing Date: 09th September 2025
    Decision Date: 25th February 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 179-Civil Judge

    Orders

    13
    Final Order 7
    25 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER
    25.02.2026
    Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Sh. Rajiv Saini, Ld. counsel for defendant.
    Cost of Rs. 1,000/- paid to plaintiff.
    Replication filed. Copy supplied.
    It has come to the notice of the court that the present
    suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking the relief of permanent
    injunction restraining the defendant from illegally dispossessing
    the plaintiff from the suit property.
    But today, Ld. counsel for plaintiff has admitted that
    the plaintiff is no longer in the possession of the suit property and
    was dispossessed during the pendency of the suit.
    Since the present suit has been filed seeking
    simplicitor injunction restraining the defendant from
    dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit property without proving
    the possession. In view of the guidelines laid down in
    Anathula
    Sudhakar vs. P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) by LRs and Others (2008) 4
    SCC 594, the present suit stands dismissed.
    File be consigned to record room after due
    compliance.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/25.02.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 6Full order available
    03 Feb 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 2 CS SCJ 1658/25 VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER 03.02.2026 Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Neeraj Rathee, Ld. counsel for defendant. Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Be taken on record. Ld. counsel for defendant has filed WS alongwith the application u/o VIII Rule 1 CPC seeking condonation of delay of 33 days. Copy supplied. Heard. Perused. It is no gainsay that procedure is the handmaid…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 5
    14 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 4 CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER
    14.01.2026
    Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Sh. Rajiv Saini, Ld. counsel for defendants.
    Let WS be filed, subject to limitation period with
    advance copy to opposite side against receipt, after which,
    replication, if any, be filed on the NDOH with advance copy to
    opposite side against receipt.
    List for completion of pleadings/further proceedings
    on 03.02.2026.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/14.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    08 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR VS. VISHAL GROVER
    08.12.2025
    File taken up today in view of order dt. 04.12.2025 passed by
    Sh. Gopal Krishan, Ld. JSCC/ASCJ/GJ-01 (Central), THC, Delhi
    whereby the file has been remanded back to this Court.
    Present : Sh. Sourav Ghosh, Ld. counsel for plaintiff with
    plaintiff.
    Sh. Rajiv Saini, Ld. counsel for defendants with
    defendant no. 2.
    Let WS be filed, subject to limitation period with
    advance copy to opposite side against receipt, after which,
    replication, if any, be filed on the NDOH with advance copy to
    opposite side against receipt.
    List for completion of pleadings/further proceedings
    on 14.01.2026.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/08.12.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    19 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER
    19.09.2025
    Present : Sh. Sourav Ghosh, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Ld. counsel for plaintiff has filed the simplicitor suit
    for injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the
    plaintiff from the suit property i.e. property no. 11A/32, Channa
    Market, Near Hanuman Mandir, Gol Chakkar, Karol Bagh, New
    Delhi-110005 without filing any proof of possession, rent
    agreement or any other document to show that the plaintiff is in
    physical possession of the suit property.
    Today, Ld. counsel for plaintiff has moved an
    application u/o VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of plaint by
    adding that the plaintiff has no operational bank account in his
    name and the payments of rent is made from the bank account of
    his friend Mr. Vajrapani Tripathi.
    Since the plaintiff has failed to prove the possession
    in the suit property, in view of guideline laid down in the
    Anathula Sudhakar vs. P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) by LRs and
    Others (2008) 4 SCC 594, the present suit stands dismissed.
    File be consigned to record room after due
    compliance.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/19.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    10 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER
    10.09.2025
    Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Put up for compliance of order dt. 09.09.25, on
    19.09.2025.
    Last opportunity given, failing which, the matter
    will be dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/10.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    09 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR
    Vs
    VISHAL GROVER
    09.09.2025
    Fresh suit is received by way of assignment through e-filing. It
    be checked and registered.
    Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Hard copy of plaint and annexed documents filed.
    Be taken on record.
    Ld. counsel for plaintiff has filed the present suit
    seeking simplicitor injunction restraining the defendants from
    dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit property, but perusal of
    file reveals that the plaintiff has not filed any proof regarding the
    possession of the suit property.
    Ld. counsel for plaintiff is directed to file the
    statement of account in the name of the plaintiff to show that the
    rent in the amount of Rs. 35,000/- was paid to the defendants in
    the last month, any rent agreement or any other document to
    prove that the plaintiff is in settled possession of the suit
    property.
    Put up for consideration on 10.09.2025.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/09.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 6Full order available
    03 Feb 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 2 CS SCJ 1658/25 VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER 03.02.2026 Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Neeraj Rathee, Ld. counsel for defendant. Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Be taken on record. Ld. counsel for defendant has filed WS alongwith the application u/o VIII Rule 1 CPC seeking condonation of delay of 33 days. Copy supplied. Heard. Perused. It is no gainsay that procedure is the handmaid…

    Read Full Order
    Order 5
    14 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 4 CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER
    14.01.2026
    Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Sh. Rajiv Saini, Ld. counsel for defendants.
    Let WS be filed, subject to limitation period with
    advance copy to opposite side against receipt, after which,
    replication, if any, be filed on the NDOH with advance copy to
    opposite side against receipt.
    List for completion of pleadings/further proceedings
    on 03.02.2026.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/14.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    08 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR VS. VISHAL GROVER
    08.12.2025
    File taken up today in view of order dt. 04.12.2025 passed by
    Sh. Gopal Krishan, Ld. JSCC/ASCJ/GJ-01 (Central), THC, Delhi
    whereby the file has been remanded back to this Court.
    Present : Sh. Sourav Ghosh, Ld. counsel for plaintiff with
    plaintiff.
    Sh. Rajiv Saini, Ld. counsel for defendants with
    defendant no. 2.
    Let WS be filed, subject to limitation period with
    advance copy to opposite side against receipt, after which,
    replication, if any, be filed on the NDOH with advance copy to
    opposite side against receipt.
    List for completion of pleadings/further proceedings
    on 14.01.2026.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/08.12.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    19 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER
    19.09.2025
    Present : Sh. Sourav Ghosh, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Ld. counsel for plaintiff has filed the simplicitor suit
    for injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the
    plaintiff from the suit property i.e. property no. 11A/32, Channa
    Market, Near Hanuman Mandir, Gol Chakkar, Karol Bagh, New
    Delhi-110005 without filing any proof of possession, rent
    agreement or any other document to show that the plaintiff is in
    physical possession of the suit property.
    Today, Ld. counsel for plaintiff has moved an
    application u/o VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of plaint by
    adding that the plaintiff has no operational bank account in his
    name and the payments of rent is made from the bank account of
    his friend Mr. Vajrapani Tripathi.
    Since the plaintiff has failed to prove the possession
    in the suit property, in view of guideline laid down in the
    Anathula Sudhakar vs. P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) by LRs and
    Others (2008) 4 SCC 594, the present suit stands dismissed.
    File be consigned to record room after due
    compliance.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/19.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    10 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR Vs. VISHAL GROVER
    10.09.2025
    Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Put up for compliance of order dt. 09.09.25, on
    19.09.2025.
    Last opportunity given, failing which, the matter
    will be dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/10.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    09 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1658/25
    VEER KUMAR
    Vs
    VISHAL GROVER
    09.09.2025
    Fresh suit is received by way of assignment through e-filing. It
    be checked and registered.
    Present : Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
    Hard copy of plaint and annexed documents filed.
    Be taken on record.
    Ld. counsel for plaintiff has filed the present suit
    seeking simplicitor injunction restraining the defendants from
    dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit property, but perusal of
    file reveals that the plaintiff has not filed any proof regarding the
    possession of the suit property.
    Ld. counsel for plaintiff is directed to file the
    statement of account in the name of the plaintiff to show that the
    rent in the amount of Rs. 35,000/- was paid to the defendants in
    the last month, any rent agreement or any other document to
    prove that the plaintiff is in settled possession of the suit
    property.
    Put up for consideration on 10.09.2025.
    (Sahil Gupta)
    CJ-07(C)/THC/Delhi/09.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.