Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 4

CNR DLCT03005436202503 Jan 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 4 · 03 Jan 2026 · CNR DLCT030054362025

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 1646/25 Vandana Bagga Vs. Union of India
03.01.2026
Present: Sh. Abhijit Mishra, Ld. counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff via VC.
Ms. Bani Dikshit, Sh. Udhav Khanna, Ld. counsel
for defendant no.1 to 6.
Sh. Ashwin Kataria, Ld. counsel for defendant no.7.
An application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC alongwith
documents filed on behalf of the defendant no.7. Same be taken
on record. Copy supplied to the Ld. proxy counsel for the
plaintiff present in the court.
Written statement filed on behalf of defendant no.1
to 6 alongwith application U/S 5 Limitation Act, application U/O
7 Rule 11 CPC, list of documents alongwith documents,
vakalatnama and proof of service on 02.12.2025. Same be taken
on record. Copy supplied to the Ld. proxy counsel for the
plaintiff present in the court.
Perusal of the same shows that though proof of
service has been mentioned in the index of the WS and
application U/S 5 of the Limitation Act and U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC,
no such proof of service have been annexed with the same.
Ld. counsel for the defendant no.1 to 6 submits that
inadvertently, the same has been mentioned in the index.
Defendant no.1 to 6 are directed to be careful in
future while filing the documents in the court.
Reader of the court is directed to strike out the proof
of service from the index as mentioned aforesaid with ‘red ink’.
Plaintiff is at liberty to file the reply to the
application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC filed on behalf of the defendant
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
no. 1 to 6 and defendant no.7 alongwith advance copy to the
opposite side atleast 07 days before the next date of hearing.
Ld. counsel for the parties submit that the arguments
on the pending application U/O 7 Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of
the defendant no.7, the applications U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC filed on
behalf of the defendant no. 1 to 6 and defendant no.7 shall be
heard together.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has no
objection if the application U/S 5 Limitation Act filed on behalf
of the defendant no.1 to 6 is allowed and WS filed by them is
taken on record.
In view of the same, application U/S 5 Limitation
Act is allowed and the WS alongwith documents filed on behalf
of the defendant no. 1 to 6 are taken on record subject to cost of
Rs.100/- to be deposited in DLSA, Central, THC, Delhi on or
before the NDOH.
Plaintiff is at liberty to file replication to the WS of
the defendant no.1 to 6 within 30 days from today alongwith
advance copy to the opposite side.
Put up for arguments on the application U/O 7 Rule
10 CPC, application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC moved on behalf of the
defendant no.7 and application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC moved on
behalf of defendant no.1 to 6 on 28.03.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/03.01.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.