Interim Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 MCA SCJ 17/24
SUSHMA SHARMA VS. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
08.01.2025
Present : Ms. Amita Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. Abhishek Kumar, Ld. counsel for the respondent no. 1.
Sh. Tanvir Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2, 3 and 4.
Ms. Yamini Mittal, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 5 and 6.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent no. 5 and 6.
Same is taken on record.
Arguments on application u/s 5 of Limitation Act for
condonation of delay in filing the present appeal heard.
It is submitted by ld. counsel for appellant that due to
miscommunication and misunderstanding between the appellant and her
counsel, the appellant was constrained to change her counsel which
resulted in a delay of 7 days in preferring the present appeal. Ld. counsel
for respondent no. 5 and 6 submits that she has no objection if the
application u/s 5 of Limitation Act is allowed. The application is opposed
by counsels for remaining respondents on the ground that no valid
explanation for the delay has been furnished.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
Considering the same and in the interest of justice, application
u/s 5 of Limitation Act is allowed and delay is condoned subject to
payment of cost of Rs.500/- to each of the respondents by the appellant.
Put up for further proceedings on 10.03.2025.
(Upasana Satija)
SCJ-cum-RC: Central
08.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --