RAJKUMAR BARIVsSRI RAM JINDAL +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 RC ARC 483/25
RAJKUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
07.05.2026
Present: Mr. Kunika Tondwal, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.
1through VC.
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 2
along-with respondent No. 2.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has submitted that the
respondent No. 1 does not wish to contest the present case since he is not
in possession of the concerned premises. He has submitted that
respondent No. 1 will appear on the next date of hearing and give a
statement to this effect.
Respondent No. 2 had entered appearance on the last date of
hearing. However, no WS has been filed till date on behalf of the
respondent No. 2. Statutory period to file the same has already elapsed.
Accordingly, right to file WS stands closed.
Petitioner is directed to file list of witnesses within 15 days
with advance copy to the opposite party.
Evidence by way of the affidavit of PWs be filed within 30
days with advance copy to the opposite party.
Put up for PE on 30.07.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/07.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 RC ARC 483/25
RAJKUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
05.02.2026
Present: Ms. Bhairabi Das and Ms. Kunika Tondwal Ld. Counsel for
the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondent
No. 1 through VC.
Respondent No. 1 in person through VC.
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 2.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 2. The
same is taken on record.
As per the report of the Process Server, respondent No. 1 and
2 were served on 16.01.2026.
Let WS be filed subject to limitation.
Put up for purpose fixed on 07.05.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 483/25
Rajkumar Bari v. Sri Ram Jindal
23.12.2025
File is taken up on an application.
Present : Ms. Ashi Nigam, Ld. Counsel for the petitioners.
One application is filed for placing on record alternate address
of the respondent along-with amended memo of parties.
Submissions heard.
In view of the submissions, application stands allowed.
Let summons be issued upon the respondent at the alternate as
well in terms of the order dated 15.09.2025.
The affidavit affirming the correctness of the WhatsApp
number of the respondent has also been placed on record. Let the
summons be served through e-mode as well as directed in the previous
ordersheet.
The present application stands disposed of.
Put up for the date already fixed i.e., for 05.02.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/23.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10RC ARC483/25
RAJKUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
20.11.2025
Present: Ms. Ashi Nigam and Ms. Kunika, Ld. Counsel for the
petitioner.
Summons not received back.
Let the previous order be complied afresh through all modes
for 05.02.2026.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to file the plaint
alongwith documents in PDF form on the email ID of the Court, so that
the same could be served upon the defendant through WhatsApp
alongwith summons.
Plaintiff is directed to file an affidavit affirming the
correctness of the Whatsapp number of the defendant.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/20.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 483/2025
Raj Kumar Bari Vs. Sri Ramesh Jindal
15.09.2025
File is taken up on an application for early hearing.
Present : Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
One application filed on 10.09.2025 for early hearing of the
present case along-with correct site plan.
Heard.
In view of the submissions, application stands allowed
and site plan is taken on record.
Issue summons upon the respondent, on filing of PF, RC &
Speed Post within 07 working days returnable for the date already fixed
i.e. for 20.11.2025. Copy of the site plan be also sent along-with the
summons.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/15.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 483-2025
RAJ KUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
CNR No. DLCT03-004895-2025
08.08.2025
Regular stenographer of this Court is on leave today.
Fresh eviction petition under Section 14(1)(a) of the DRC Act received
by way of assignment. Let it be checked and registered.
Present: Ms. Ashi Nigam, ld counsel for petitioner through V.C.
Perusal of file shows that Site Plan filed along with the
petition is not prepared by Draughts man. Let the proper Site Plan be
filed by the next date of hearing.
Put up for filing of the proper Site Plan and for
Consideration on 20.11.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/08.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 RC ARC 483/25 RAJKUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
17.09.2026
Present: Ms. Kunika Tondwal, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Ishra Bi, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the respondent No. 2
along-with respondent No. 2.
None for the respondent No. 1.
Oral prayer has been made for reduction of cost on behalf of
respondent No. 2.
Taking a lenient view, the cost imposed vide the previous
order is reduced to Rs. 3,500/-. The same stands paid.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that they have
not received a copy of the site plan mentioned in the WS. Let the same
be supplied within 07 days.
Replication, if any, be filed within 15 days thereafter with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Put up for further proceedings on 21.11.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/17.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 RC ARC 483/25
RAJKUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
07.05.2026
Present: Mr. Kunika Tondwal, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.
1through VC.
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 2
along-with respondent No. 2.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has submitted that the
respondent No. 1 does not wish to contest the present case since he is not
in possession of the concerned premises. He has submitted that
respondent No. 1 will appear on the next date of hearing and give a
statement to this effect.
Respondent No. 2 had entered appearance on the last date of
hearing. However, no WS has been filed till date on behalf of the
respondent No. 2. Statutory period to file the same has already elapsed.
Accordingly, right to file WS stands closed.
Petitioner is directed to file list of witnesses within 15 days
with advance copy to the opposite party.
Evidence by way of the affidavit of PWs be filed within 30
days with advance copy to the opposite party.
Put up for PE on 30.07.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/07.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 RC ARC 483/25
RAJKUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
05.02.2026
Present: Ms. Bhairabi Das and Ms. Kunika Tondwal Ld. Counsel for
the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondent
No. 1 through VC.
Respondent No. 1 in person through VC.
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 2.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 2. The
same is taken on record.
As per the report of the Process Server, respondent No. 1 and
2 were served on 16.01.2026.
Let WS be filed subject to limitation.
Put up for purpose fixed on 07.05.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 483/25
Rajkumar Bari v. Sri Ram Jindal
23.12.2025
File is taken up on an application.
Present : Ms. Ashi Nigam, Ld. Counsel for the petitioners.
One application is filed for placing on record alternate address
of the respondent along-with amended memo of parties.
Submissions heard.
In view of the submissions, application stands allowed.
Let summons be issued upon the respondent at the alternate as
well in terms of the order dated 15.09.2025.
The affidavit affirming the correctness of the WhatsApp
number of the respondent has also been placed on record. Let the
summons be served through e-mode as well as directed in the previous
ordersheet.
The present application stands disposed of.
Put up for the date already fixed i.e., for 05.02.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/23.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10RC ARC483/25
RAJKUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
20.11.2025
Present: Ms. Ashi Nigam and Ms. Kunika, Ld. Counsel for the
petitioner.
Summons not received back.
Let the previous order be complied afresh through all modes
for 05.02.2026.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to file the plaint
alongwith documents in PDF form on the email ID of the Court, so that
the same could be served upon the defendant through WhatsApp
alongwith summons.
Plaintiff is directed to file an affidavit affirming the
correctness of the Whatsapp number of the defendant.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/20.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 483/2025
Raj Kumar Bari Vs. Sri Ramesh Jindal
15.09.2025
File is taken up on an application for early hearing.
Present : Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
One application filed on 10.09.2025 for early hearing of the
present case along-with correct site plan.
Heard.
In view of the submissions, application stands allowed
and site plan is taken on record.
Issue summons upon the respondent, on filing of PF, RC &
Speed Post within 07 working days returnable for the date already fixed
i.e. for 20.11.2025. Copy of the site plan be also sent along-with the
summons.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/15.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 483-2025
RAJ KUMAR BARI Vs. SRI RAM JINDAL
CNR No. DLCT03-004895-2025
08.08.2025
Regular stenographer of this Court is on leave today.
Fresh eviction petition under Section 14(1)(a) of the DRC Act received
by way of assignment. Let it be checked and registered.
Present: Ms. Ashi Nigam, ld counsel for petitioner through V.C.
Perusal of file shows that Site Plan filed along with the
petition is not prepared by Draughts man. Let the proper Site Plan be
filed by the next date of hearing.
Put up for filing of the proper Site Plan and for
Consideration on 20.11.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/08.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --