Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 5

CNR DLCT03003671202528 Jan 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 5 · 28 Jan 2026 · CNR DLCT030036712025

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 RC ARC 345/25
VINOD CHADHA Vs. RANDHIR SINGH JASPAL SINGH
28.01.2026
Present: Sh. Vinod Kumar Mantoo, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Osama Suhail, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2
(through VC).
In between order sheets, an application under Order 22
Rule 3 r/w Section 151 of CPC seeking impleadment of LRs of deceased
respondent no.1 has been filed on behalf of petitioner along with amended
memo of parties on 24.11.2025.
Though the application has not been filed under the correct
provision, however, without going into technicalities, the court is
proceeding with adjudication of the said application on merits.
It is submitted on behalf of applicant that respondent no.1
Sh. Randhir Singh has expired on 24.08.2025 and vide order dated
01.09.2025 the court had taken the same on record as per Order 22 Rule
10A of CPC. That respondent no.1 has been survived by the following legal
heirs i.e. Ms. Jaskiran Sachdeva (wife) and one son whose details are not
known.
There is no mandate in law to issue notice of the
application under Order 22 Rule 3/Rule 4 of CPC to the proposed LRs of
the deceased.
It is observed that the right to sue against the LRs of
respondent no.1 survives. Further the present application has been filed
within the prescribed period. Hence, the present application is hereby
allowed and disposed of accordingly.
-- 1 of 2 --
LRs of deceased respondent no.1 are hereby impleaded and
amended memo of parties is taken on record.
Let notice be issued to the LRs of the deceased respondent
no.1 on filing of PF and speed post, returnable for the next date of hearing.
In case of refusal or non-availability or if premises found locked, same be
affixed on the given address.
Further, as per record reply to leave to defend application of
respondent no.1 along with the affidavit as well as reply to leave to defend
application of respondent no.2 has been filed on behalf of petitioner. Copy
stated to be already supplied.
Respondent no.2 is at liberty to file rejoinder (if any) on or
before the next date of hearing after supplying advance copy to opposite
side.
All the parties are directed to appear in person on the next
date of hearing along with main counsel.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application(s), on
16.04.2026.
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
28.01.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.