Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 6

CNR DLCT03003493202306 Aug 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 6 · 06 Aug 2024 · CNR DLCT030034932023

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 1274/23
SUNIL GULATI Vs. NITESH
06.08.2024
Present: Ms. Meena Duggal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff via VC.
Sh. Birendra Kumar, Ld. Proxy counsel for
defendant.
WS alongwith application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC had
been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff states that copy of the
above were received. She further states that replication and reply
to the application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC have been e-filed and the
same shall be physically filed within course of the day.
Considered.
Let replication and reply be filed within course of
the day and advance copy of the same be supplied to the opposite
side.
Now to come up for arguments on the application
U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC on 28.10.2024.
(KAPIL GUPTA)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/06.08.2024
-- 1 of 4 --
11 CS SCJ 1275/23
SUNIL GULATI Vs. SHARWAN HOME FOODS
06.08.2024
Present: Ms. Meena Duggal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff via VC.
Sh. Birendra Kumar, Ld. Proxy counsel for
defendant.
WS alongwith application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC had
been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff states that copy of the
above were received. She further states that replication and reply
to the application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC have been e-filed and the
same shall be physically filed within course of the day.
Considered.
Let replication and reply be filed within course of
the day and advance copy of the same be supplied to the opposite
side.
Now to come up for arguments on the application
U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC on 28.10.2024.
(KAPIL GUPTA)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/06.08.2024
-- 2 of 4 --
12 CS SCJ 1276/23
SUNIL GULATI Vs. DINESH
06.08.2024
Present: Ms. Meena Duggal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff via VC.
Sh. Birendra Kumar, Ld. Proxy counsel for
defendant.
WS alongwith application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC had
been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff states that copy of the
above were received. She further states that replication and reply
to the application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC have been e-filed and the
same shall be physically filed within course of the day.
Considered.
Let replication and reply be filed within course of
the day and advance copy of the same be supplied to the opposite
side.
Now to come up for arguments on the application
U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC on 28.10.2024.
(KAPIL GUPTA)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/06.08.2024
-- 3 of 4 --
13 CS SCJ 1277/23
SUNIL GULATI Vs. MUKUL
06.08.2024
Present: Ms. Meena Duggal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff via VC.
Sh. Birendra Kumar, Ld. Proxy counsel for
defendant.
WS alongwith application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC had
been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff states that copy of the
above were received. She further states that replication and reply
to the application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC have been e-filed and the
same shall be physically filed within course of the day.
Considered.
Let replication and reply be filed within course of
the day and advance copy of the same be supplied to the opposite
side.
Now to come up for arguments on the application
U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC on 28.10.2024.
(KAPIL GUPTA)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/06.08.2024
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.