Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 2

CNR DLCT03003258202320 Jul 2023
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 2 · 20 Jul 2023 · CNR DLCT030032582023

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ No. 1173/23
PRADEEP KUMAR Vs. KAMAL
20.07.2023
Present : Sh. C. Prakash, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff in
person.
Sh. Rakesh Patiyal, Ld. Counsel for defendants no.1 and 3
with defendant no.1 and 3 in person.
Defendant no.5 in person.
Sh. Parth Mahajan, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.6
alongwith the defendant no. 6.
Fresh vakalatnama is filed on behalf of the defendants no.1
and 3. The same is taken on record.
Summons issued to the defendant on.2 and 4 are received
back unserved with remarks 'not such person/does not reside'.
In view of the report, on filing of the fresh address of the
defendants no.2 and 4, let fresh summons of the suit be issued to the
defendant no.2 and 4 on fling of required PF and RC through all modes,
for 03.10.2023.
At this stage, it is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.1 and 3 that the defendants no.1 and 3 have no concern
with the suit property and they are also not in the possession of the same.
A separate statement of the defendants no.1 and 3 to that
effect is recorded in the Court.
At this stage, the defendant no.5 present in the Court has
also submitted that though she is in the possession of the suit property in
the capacity of a tenant through her grandfather, however, she is ready to
give a statement before this Court that she would not create any third
party interest in respect of the suit property.
Page 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
A separate statement of the defendant no.5 is also recorded
to that effect in the Court.
In view of the statement of the defendants no.1, 3 and 5, it is
submitted by the Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that the plaintiff does not wish
to pursue the present suit qua the defendants no.1, 3 and 5 and
accordingly they may be dropped from the array of the parties.
A separate statement of the plaintiff to that effect is also
recorded in the Court.
In view of the statement of plaintiff as well as the
defendants no.1, 3 and 5, the present suit stands disposed off qua
defendants no.1, 3 and 5.
At request of the defendant no.6 that she wants to file WS to
the suit of the plaintiff alongwith reply to the application of the plaintiff
under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, she is at liberty to file the same as per
the period of limitation by the next date of hearing with advance copy to
the plaintiff side.
Balwinder Singh
SCJ-cum-RC: Central District:
20.07.2023
Page 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.