Order 11

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
ESIC No. 2/23
MS VAISHNO SECURITY AND PLACEMENT SERVICES
REGDVs. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
06.03.2024
Present : Sh. Vinod Kataria, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Swarnjeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent
alongwith Sh. Vimal Gupta, SSO.
More time sought to file reply in terms of previous
order.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of
the Court to application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking
an interim injunction against further recovery from the pension
account of the petitioner.
It is argued that already the petitioner has deposited
more than 50% of the amount in dispute/the demand of the
respondent. It is pointed out that the demand raised by the
respondent is Rs.8.07 lakhs approximately and so far an amount of
Rs.4.05 lakhs has already been deducted from the account of the
petitioner.
Ld. Counsel appearing for ESIC submits that he has no
objection, if, upon payment of 50% of the disputed/claimed amounts,
an injunction is granted, subject to maintaining sufficient balance in
the said account by the petitioner.
Ld. Counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to
do the same.
Page 1 of 2 (PTO)
-- 1 of 2 --
Before proceeding further, I deem appropriate to have
on record the reply of ESIC, in terms of previous order.
Be put up for reply/arguments on 20.03.2024.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)
SCJ-cum-RC: Central District:
06.03.2024
Page 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --