Interim Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS SCJ 687/25
ANIL KUMAR Vs. RAM NARAYAN YADAV
27.08.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: None for plaintiff.
Ms. Sonia, Ld. counsel for the defendants no. 1 to 3 (through
VC).
Sh. Sunil Rana, Sr. Assistant, RTO, Auto Taxi Unit, Burari.
It is submitted by Ms. Sonia that she has received the copy of
the application for impleadment u/o I Rule 10 CPC. It is further submitted
that proposed defendant M/s. Eco Star has no objection, if they are impleaded
in the present suit as a defendant.
Report filed on behalf of District Transport Officer alongwith
the details of the vehicle in question an copy of Form -34. Taken on record.
Heard. Record perused.
Considering the submissions and contents of the application,
it appears that proposed defendants no. 3 and 4 are necessary party in the
present suit as M/s. Eco Star Securities & Credit Pvt. Ltd. is the party who
has hypothecated the vehicle in question and the vehicle is registered with
proposed defendant no. 4 i.e. Transport Department, Auto Taxi Unit, Burari,
Delhi.
In view of the above, application of plaintiff for impleadment
is allowed and disposed off.
M/s. Eco Star Securities & Credit Pvt. Ltd. and Registering
Authority, Transport Department, Auto Taxi Unit, are impleaded as
defendants no. 3 and 4 respectively.
Amended memo of parties be taken on record.
Now to come up for arguments on the application for
amendment of plaint on 16.09.2025.
[Arvind Dev]
Civil Judge-09, C/THC/Delhi
27.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --