JAGDISH SHARMAVsSUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CNR DLCT030022422025
16 RC ARC 206/25
Jagdish sharma Vs. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
23.09.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
None for respondent NO. 1
Respondent No. 2 already deleted from array of parties.
Matter is listed for arguments on leave to defend application.
It is submitted by clerk present in the Court on behalf of
respondent No. 1 that father of the main counsel has suffered from
paralysis attack. Copy of medical documents dated 15.09.2026 filed in
support of the contention. Adjournment sought.
Considering the medical reason, adjournment is being granted
by absolute final opportunity.
Both the parties are at liberty to file brief written submissions,
if any with an advance copy to each other.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application on
10.10.2026. (Date is given as per convenience of both the parties).
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
23.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 RC ARC 206/25
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
15.07.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Adarsh Sharma, Ld. proxy counsel for respondent no.1.
respondent no.2 already deleted from array of parties vide
order dt. 10.10.2025.
Record shows that respondent no. 1 was given 15 days time to
file rejoinder, if any to reply filed by petitioner to leave to defend
application. Till date no rejoinder has been filed despite opportunity given.
Accordingly, right of the respondent to file rejoinder stands
closed.
Adjournment sought on behalf of respondent no. 1 on the
ground that father of the main counsel is not well today. Allowed by way
of last opportunity.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application on
23.09.2026. (Date is given as per convenience of both the parties).
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
15.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 RC ARC 206/25
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
24.04.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Nagendra Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
Respondent no.2 already deleted from array of parties vide
order dated 10.10.2025.
Matter is listed for arguments on an application under
Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 of CPC.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he is not pressing
this application and prays that same may be disposed of as not pressed.
Heard.
Accordingly, the application under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w
Section 151 of CPC is dismissed as not pressed and disposed of.
Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 sought time to file
rejoinder to reply to leave to defend application. Heard. Rejoinder (if any),
may be filed within 15 days after supplying advance copy of the same to
opposite side.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application, on
15.07.2026. It is made clear that no adjournment shall be granted to either
of the parties for arguments on leave to defend. The date is given as per
the choice of both the counsel.
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
24.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 RC ARC 206/25
Jagdish sharma Vs. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
09.02.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Nagender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
Respondent no. 2 deleted from array of parties.
Matter is listed for arguments on leave to defend
application.
In between ordersheets, reply to leave to defend application
has been filed on behalf of petitioner. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1
submits that he has not received the same. Petitioner is directed to supply
the copy during the course of the day.
Further, record shows that an application U/o 1 Rule 10 r/w
Section 151 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking
impleadment of LRs of deceased respondent no.2.
perusal of record shows that respondent no. 2 has already
been deleted from array of parties vide order dt. 10.10.2025 passed by the
Ld. Predecessor of this Court.
Put up for arguments on the afore said applications on
24.04.2026.
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
09.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 RC ARC 206/25
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
08.12.2025
Present: Sh. Vikas Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Nagendra Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
respondent no.2 deleted from array of parties vide order
dated 10.10.2025.
Till date, petitioner has not filed reply to leave to defend
application nor he filed amended memo of parties.
One opportunity sought on behalf of petitioner stating that
Ld. Counsel for petitioner had met with an accident. Heard. Considering the
medical reasons, one final opportunity is given to the petitioner to file reply
to leave to defend application and to file amended memo of parties in terms
of previous order within one week from today after supplying advance copy
of the same to opposite side failing which cost of Rs.3,000/- shall be
imposed payable to opposite side.
Put up for reply/arguments on leave to defend application,
on 09.02.2026. It is made clear that no adjournment shall be granted to
either of the parties for arguments on leave to defend.
The date is given as
per the choice of both the counsel.
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
08.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 206/25
Jagdish sharma Vs. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
12.08.2025
Present :- Sh. Vikas Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for petitioner
alongwith petitioner.
Sh. Rahul, Proxy Counsel for the respondent no. 1 .
This is petition u/s 14(1) (e) r/w section 25-B DRC
Act. Summons in the prescribed format were served upon the
respondent no. 1 on 29.05.2025 and thereafter, application for
leave to defend have been filed on 11.06.2025 through e-filing as
mentioned in the order dated 15.07.2025 within 15 days from
date of service.
Again it is pertinent to observe that as mentioned in
the application for leave to defend , respondent no. 2 namely
Manish Jain has already expired. Accordingly, petitioner is at
liberty to take appropriate steps for impleadment of LRs of
respondent no. 2, if any and if required.
Reply (if any) to the application for leave to defend,
may be filed well before NDOH with advance copy to the
Respondent and thereafter, rejoinder (if any), may be filed well
before NDOH with advance copy to the petitioner.
Now file be put up on 10.10.2025 for arguments on
leave to defend.
(VIVEK KUMAR AGARWAL)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
12.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 205/2025
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
15.07.2025
Case file taken up today on application for leave to defend filed
through e-filing on 11.06.2025 on behalf of respondent no. 1.
Present :- Sh. Nagender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for Respondent
no. 1.
Hard copy of application has been filed today. The
copy of the application for leave to defend application has been
sent to the opposite party through whatsapp. Copy of proof of
service is attached with the application.
Now to come on the dated fixed i.e. 12.08.2025.
(VIVEK KUMAR AGARWAL)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
15.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 206/2025
JAGDISH Sharma VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
21.04.2025
File taken up on filing of hard copy of petition for eviction under
section 14 (1) (e) r/w section 25 (B) of Delhi Rent Control Act,
1958 is filed through e-filing. It be checked and registered.
Present :- Ld. Counsel for Petitioner.
Hard copy filed. Perused.
Notice be issued to the respondent in accordance
with the provision of Section 25-B of the DRC Act in the
prescribed proforma under schedule III of the Act on filing PF &
RC for NDOH . And in case of refusal, non-availability or
premises found locked, notice be affixed.
Put up for service report on date already fixed i.e.
12.08.2025.
(ARJINDER KAUR)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
21.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: RC ARC 206/2025
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
16.04.2025
Soft copy of fresh petition for Eviction under section 14 (1) (e)
r/w section 25 (B) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 is filed
through e-filing.
Present :- None.
Put up for consideration on 12.08.2025.
(ARJINDER KAUR)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
16.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR DLCT030022422025
13 RC ARC 206/25
Jagdish sharma Vs. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
10.10.2026
In view of notification No. 100/G-4/Gen-I/DHC dt. 09.10.2026, no adverse
orders are being passed today.
VC of the Court is not working
Present: None for petitioner.
None for respondent no. 1
Respondent no. 2 is already deleted from array of the parties
vide order dated 10.10.2025.
Matter is listed for arguments on leave to defend application.
All the parties are directed to be present on NDOH.
Put up for purpose fixed on 06.01.2027.
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
10.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CNR DLCT030022422025
16 RC ARC 206/25
Jagdish sharma Vs. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
23.09.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
None for respondent NO. 1
Respondent No. 2 already deleted from array of parties.
Matter is listed for arguments on leave to defend application.
It is submitted by clerk present in the Court on behalf of
respondent No. 1 that father of the main counsel has suffered from
paralysis attack. Copy of medical documents dated 15.09.2026 filed in
support of the contention. Adjournment sought.
Considering the medical reason, adjournment is being granted
by absolute final opportunity.
Both the parties are at liberty to file brief written submissions,
if any with an advance copy to each other.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application on
10.10.2026. (Date is given as per convenience of both the parties).
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
23.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 RC ARC 206/25
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
15.07.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Adarsh Sharma, Ld. proxy counsel for respondent no.1.
respondent no.2 already deleted from array of parties vide
order dt. 10.10.2025.
Record shows that respondent no. 1 was given 15 days time to
file rejoinder, if any to reply filed by petitioner to leave to defend
application. Till date no rejoinder has been filed despite opportunity given.
Accordingly, right of the respondent to file rejoinder stands
closed.
Adjournment sought on behalf of respondent no. 1 on the
ground that father of the main counsel is not well today. Allowed by way
of last opportunity.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application on
23.09.2026. (Date is given as per convenience of both the parties).
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
15.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 RC ARC 206/25
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
24.04.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Nagendra Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
Respondent no.2 already deleted from array of parties vide
order dated 10.10.2025.
Matter is listed for arguments on an application under
Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 of CPC.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he is not pressing
this application and prays that same may be disposed of as not pressed.
Heard.
Accordingly, the application under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w
Section 151 of CPC is dismissed as not pressed and disposed of.
Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 sought time to file
rejoinder to reply to leave to defend application. Heard. Rejoinder (if any),
may be filed within 15 days after supplying advance copy of the same to
opposite side.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application, on
15.07.2026. It is made clear that no adjournment shall be granted to either
of the parties for arguments on leave to defend. The date is given as per
the choice of both the counsel.
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
24.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 RC ARC 206/25
Jagdish sharma Vs. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
09.02.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Nagender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
Respondent no. 2 deleted from array of parties.
Matter is listed for arguments on leave to defend
application.
In between ordersheets, reply to leave to defend application
has been filed on behalf of petitioner. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1
submits that he has not received the same. Petitioner is directed to supply
the copy during the course of the day.
Further, record shows that an application U/o 1 Rule 10 r/w
Section 151 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking
impleadment of LRs of deceased respondent no.2.
perusal of record shows that respondent no. 2 has already
been deleted from array of parties vide order dt. 10.10.2025 passed by the
Ld. Predecessor of this Court.
Put up for arguments on the afore said applications on
24.04.2026.
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
09.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 RC ARC 206/25
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
08.12.2025
Present: Sh. Vikas Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Nagendra Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
respondent no.2 deleted from array of parties vide order
dated 10.10.2025.
Till date, petitioner has not filed reply to leave to defend
application nor he filed amended memo of parties.
One opportunity sought on behalf of petitioner stating that
Ld. Counsel for petitioner had met with an accident. Heard. Considering the
medical reasons, one final opportunity is given to the petitioner to file reply
to leave to defend application and to file amended memo of parties in terms
of previous order within one week from today after supplying advance copy
of the same to opposite side failing which cost of Rs.3,000/- shall be
imposed payable to opposite side.
Put up for reply/arguments on leave to defend application,
on 09.02.2026. It is made clear that no adjournment shall be granted to
either of the parties for arguments on leave to defend.
The date is given as
per the choice of both the counsel.
(DIVYA GUPTA)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
08.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 206/25
Jagdish sharma Vs. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
12.08.2025
Present :- Sh. Vikas Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for petitioner
alongwith petitioner.
Sh. Rahul, Proxy Counsel for the respondent no. 1 .
This is petition u/s 14(1) (e) r/w section 25-B DRC
Act. Summons in the prescribed format were served upon the
respondent no. 1 on 29.05.2025 and thereafter, application for
leave to defend have been filed on 11.06.2025 through e-filing as
mentioned in the order dated 15.07.2025 within 15 days from
date of service.
Again it is pertinent to observe that as mentioned in
the application for leave to defend , respondent no. 2 namely
Manish Jain has already expired. Accordingly, petitioner is at
liberty to take appropriate steps for impleadment of LRs of
respondent no. 2, if any and if required.
Reply (if any) to the application for leave to defend,
may be filed well before NDOH with advance copy to the
Respondent and thereafter, rejoinder (if any), may be filed well
before NDOH with advance copy to the petitioner.
Now file be put up on 10.10.2025 for arguments on
leave to defend.
(VIVEK KUMAR AGARWAL)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
12.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 205/2025
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
15.07.2025
Case file taken up today on application for leave to defend filed
through e-filing on 11.06.2025 on behalf of respondent no. 1.
Present :- Sh. Nagender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for Respondent
no. 1.
Hard copy of application has been filed today. The
copy of the application for leave to defend application has been
sent to the opposite party through whatsapp. Copy of proof of
service is attached with the application.
Now to come on the dated fixed i.e. 12.08.2025.
(VIVEK KUMAR AGARWAL)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
15.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 206/2025
JAGDISH Sharma VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
21.04.2025
File taken up on filing of hard copy of petition for eviction under
section 14 (1) (e) r/w section 25 (B) of Delhi Rent Control Act,
1958 is filed through e-filing. It be checked and registered.
Present :- Ld. Counsel for Petitioner.
Hard copy filed. Perused.
Notice be issued to the respondent in accordance
with the provision of Section 25-B of the DRC Act in the
prescribed proforma under schedule III of the Act on filing PF &
RC for NDOH . And in case of refusal, non-availability or
premises found locked, notice be affixed.
Put up for service report on date already fixed i.e.
12.08.2025.
(ARJINDER KAUR)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
21.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: RC ARC 206/2025
JAGDISH SHARMA VS. SUKHAINDER KUMAR JAIN
16.04.2025
Soft copy of fresh petition for Eviction under section 14 (1) (e)
r/w section 25 (B) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 is filed
through e-filing.
Present :- None.
Put up for consideration on 12.08.2025.
(ARJINDER KAUR)
ARC-02 (Central), THC,
16.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --