MOHD ARAFEENVsSALIM

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
15.02.2025
Present: Mr. Mohd. Ahmed and Mr. Monu Singh Kain, Ld. Counsel
for the petitioner.
Mr. Waris Ali and Mr. Gaurav Chadha, Ld. Counsel for the
respondent.
Vide separate order, the leave to defend application is
dismissed. The eviction petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the
petitioner is found entitled to recover the possession of the tenanted
premises i.e. part of first floor (left from stairs) in property bearing
No. 6308-6309, Gali Baint Wali, Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi 110006, area
about 40 Sq. yds. as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed along-
with the petition. In view of the provisions of Section 14 (7) DRC Act,
1958, this order for recovery for possession shall not be executed before
expiration of a period of 6 months from this date.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/15.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 29RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
04.02.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Warish Ali and Mr. Shahnawaz, Mr. Gaurav Chadha and
Mr. Naved Rajput, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.
Respondent in person.
Both the parties have filed judgments in support of their
contentions.
Put up for orders on 15.02.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/04.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
21.12.2024
Present: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Clarifications heard.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks some time to file
judgment in support his contention that the property in question is not a
Waqf property.
Let the judgments be filed in 07 days.
Put up for order on 04.02.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/21.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 29 RC ARC No. 207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
08.11.2024
Present: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Arguments heard on the leave to defend application.
Put up for orders/ clarification on 02.12.2024.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/08.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
05.10.2024
Present: Mohd. Ahmed and Mohd. Hamza Qureshi, Ld. Counsel for
the petitioner.
Respondent in person.
Passover is sought from the side of the respondent however,
the same is not possible considering the docket of the Court.
Put up for purpose fixed on 08.11.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/05.10.2024
At this stage, Mr. Waris Ali and Ms. Shama Choudhary, Ld.
Counsel for the respondent appeared in the Court and fresh vakalatnama
filed on behalf of the respondent. The same is taken on record and he has
been apprised about the Court proceedings and next date of hearing.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Daily Court proceedings
19RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
21.08.2024
Present: Mr. Mohd. Hamza, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the petitioner.
Son of the respondent.
Passover is sought from the side of the petitioner and
adjournment is sought from the respondent side on the ground that main
counsel is not well today.
Considering the submissions, the matter stands adjourned
for today.
Put up for purpose fixed on 05.10.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/21.08.2024
At this stage Mohd. Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner
appeared in the Court and he has been apprised about the Court
proceedings and next date of hearing.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/21.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 42RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
09.04.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
Due to heavy docket, orders could not be dictated.
Now list the matter for orders on 24.04.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/09.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 32RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
14.03.2024
Present : None.
It is already 4.00 PM and the undersigned is hearing
arguments in RC ARC 237/2023, therefore, due to paucity of time orders
could not be dictated.
Put up for orders on 09.04.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/14.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
07.02.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the respondent.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent wants to bring on record
documents relating to RTI.
Whether the same is taken on record and will be considered
on next date of hearing as adjournment is sought by ld. Proxy Counsel
for the respondent on the ground that the main counsel is not well today.
Considering the submission, adjournment is granted.
Put up for consideration on 13.03.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/07.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
26.09.2023
Present : Mohd. Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for petitioner along-with
petitioner.
Mohd. Elahi and Ms. Dimpal, Ld. Counsels for
respondent.
Reply along-with documents filed by the petitioner.
Copy supplied.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for respondent that
the petitioner has filed documents along-with the reply which
cannot be taken on record as none of the parties can file
documents after filing of the leave to defend application.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within 30 days with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Put up for consideration on the submission of the
Ld. Counsel for the respondent on 07.11.2023.
(Pranav Joshi)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/26.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
17.07.2023
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present : Petitioner in person.
Leave to defend application along-with documents
has been filed on19.05.2023 within the prescribed period.
Put up for reply, if any, and rejoinder, if any, on
26.09.2023.
(Pranav Joshi)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/17.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC No. 207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
26.04.2023
Present : Sh. Mohd. Ahmed, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Heard.
Summons be issued upon the respondent as per
Section 25-B (2) of DRC Act, on filing of PF & RC within 07
working days returnable for 17.07.2023.
In-charge, Nazarat Branch is hereby directed to
ensure that the process issued shall be executed and served
preferably in 3 days. In case the respondent refuse to accept the
service or is not found available despite three mandatory visits,
process server shall affix the summons at a conspicuous place of
the respondent and leave the copy of the petition and annexure as
per procedure and will file his report alongwith affidavit of
service. Copy of the order-sheet be annexed alongwith the
process.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/26.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC No. 207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
15.04.2023
File taken up today as on 14.04.2023 was declared
as a holiday by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. 76 cases are
listed today.
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed site plan and
affidavit.
Put up for consideration on 26.04.2023.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/15.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC No. 207/23
Mohd. Arafeen Vs. Salim
18.03.2023
Fresh eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) read
with Section 25B of the DRC Act received by way of
assignment. Let it be checked and registered.
Present : Mr. Mohd. Ahmed, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner seeks time for filing
proper site plan and affidavit of Sh. Danish. Heard. Considered.
Put up for filing of property site plan and affidavit of
Sh. Danish on 14.04.2023.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/18.03.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 29RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
04.02.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Warish Ali and Mr. Shahnawaz, Mr. Gaurav Chadha and
Mr. Naved Rajput, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.
Respondent in person.
Both the parties have filed judgments in support of their
contentions.
Put up for orders on 15.02.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/04.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
21.12.2024
Present: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Clarifications heard.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks some time to file
judgment in support his contention that the property in question is not a
Waqf property.
Let the judgments be filed in 07 days.
Put up for order on 04.02.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/21.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 29 RC ARC No. 207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
08.11.2024
Present: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Arguments heard on the leave to defend application.
Put up for orders/ clarification on 02.12.2024.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/08.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
05.10.2024
Present: Mohd. Ahmed and Mohd. Hamza Qureshi, Ld. Counsel for
the petitioner.
Respondent in person.
Passover is sought from the side of the respondent however,
the same is not possible considering the docket of the Court.
Put up for purpose fixed on 08.11.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/05.10.2024
At this stage, Mr. Waris Ali and Ms. Shama Choudhary, Ld.
Counsel for the respondent appeared in the Court and fresh vakalatnama
filed on behalf of the respondent. The same is taken on record and he has
been apprised about the Court proceedings and next date of hearing.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Daily Court proceedings
19RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
21.08.2024
Present: Mr. Mohd. Hamza, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the petitioner.
Son of the respondent.
Passover is sought from the side of the petitioner and
adjournment is sought from the respondent side on the ground that main
counsel is not well today.
Considering the submissions, the matter stands adjourned
for today.
Put up for purpose fixed on 05.10.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/21.08.2024
At this stage Mohd. Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner
appeared in the Court and he has been apprised about the Court
proceedings and next date of hearing.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/21.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 42RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
09.04.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
Due to heavy docket, orders could not be dictated.
Now list the matter for orders on 24.04.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/09.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 32RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
14.03.2024
Present : None.
It is already 4.00 PM and the undersigned is hearing
arguments in RC ARC 237/2023, therefore, due to paucity of time orders
could not be dictated.
Put up for orders on 09.04.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/14.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
07.02.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the respondent.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent wants to bring on record
documents relating to RTI.
Whether the same is taken on record and will be considered
on next date of hearing as adjournment is sought by ld. Proxy Counsel
for the respondent on the ground that the main counsel is not well today.
Considering the submission, adjournment is granted.
Put up for consideration on 13.03.2024.
(Neetu Sharma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/07.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
26.09.2023
Present : Mohd. Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for petitioner along-with
petitioner.
Mohd. Elahi and Ms. Dimpal, Ld. Counsels for
respondent.
Reply along-with documents filed by the petitioner.
Copy supplied.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for respondent that
the petitioner has filed documents along-with the reply which
cannot be taken on record as none of the parties can file
documents after filing of the leave to defend application.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within 30 days with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Put up for consideration on the submission of the
Ld. Counsel for the respondent on 07.11.2023.
(Pranav Joshi)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/26.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
17.07.2023
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present : Petitioner in person.
Leave to defend application along-with documents
has been filed on19.05.2023 within the prescribed period.
Put up for reply, if any, and rejoinder, if any, on
26.09.2023.
(Pranav Joshi)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/17.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC No. 207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
26.04.2023
Present : Sh. Mohd. Ahmed, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Heard.
Summons be issued upon the respondent as per
Section 25-B (2) of DRC Act, on filing of PF & RC within 07
working days returnable for 17.07.2023.
In-charge, Nazarat Branch is hereby directed to
ensure that the process issued shall be executed and served
preferably in 3 days. In case the respondent refuse to accept the
service or is not found available despite three mandatory visits,
process server shall affix the summons at a conspicuous place of
the respondent and leave the copy of the petition and annexure as
per procedure and will file his report alongwith affidavit of
service. Copy of the order-sheet be annexed alongwith the
process.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/26.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC No. 207/23
MOHD ARAFEEN Vs. SALIM
15.04.2023
File taken up today as on 14.04.2023 was declared
as a holiday by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. 76 cases are
listed today.
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed site plan and
affidavit.
Put up for consideration on 26.04.2023.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/15.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC No. 207/23
Mohd. Arafeen Vs. Salim
18.03.2023
Fresh eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) read
with Section 25B of the DRC Act received by way of
assignment. Let it be checked and registered.
Present : Mr. Mohd. Ahmed, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner seeks time for filing
proper site plan and affidavit of Sh. Danish. Heard. Considered.
Put up for filing of property site plan and affidavit of
Sh. Danish on 14.04.2023.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/18.03.2023
-- 1 of 1 --