Full Order Text
Final Order 11 · 22 May 2025 · CNR DLCT030006622024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH. KAPIL GUPTA, CIVIL JUDGE-06/CENTRAL DISTRICT, TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI CS SCJ No. 198/2024 CNR No. DLCT03-000662-2024 IN THE MATTER OF:- 1. Sachin Aggarwal S/o Sh. Ravinder Aggarwal R/o 58-A, Kamla Nagar, Delhi-07. 2. Sanjeev Sehgal S/o Sh. Rajinder Kumar R/o 37-A/2/38, Street No. 10, New Govind Pura, Krishna Nagar, Delhi. 3. Gaurav Bansal S/o Sh. Gauri Shankar Bansal R/o 5285/7, Krishna Nagar, Near Khalsa College, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005. 4. Suman Chandak W/o Sh. Sanjay Chandak R/o 4325-A, Ward No. XIII, Gali Bhauji, Bahadur Garh Road, Pahari Dhiraj, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006. 5. Saurabh Bansal S/o Sh. Kishan Kumar Bansal R/o 5285/7, Krishna Nagar, Near Khalsa College, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005. ............. Plaintiffs Versus CS SCJ No. 198/24 Sachin Aggarwal & Ors. Vs. Pahu Mal pg. no. 1/5 -- 1 of 5 -- Pahu Mal Shop No. 533, Ground Floor, Property No. 530-35, Ward No. XIV, (Known As Darvesh Building) Gali Bajajan, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-06. ............. Defendant SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION Date of Institution : 30.01.2024 Date of Reserving for Judgment : 22.04.2025 Date of Judgment : 22.05.2025 EX-PARTE JUDGMENT 1. The present suit was filed seeking decree for permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendant thereby restraining the defendant, his agents etc. from sub-letting, alienating, transferring and parting with/handing over possession, thereby creating third party interest in respect of Shop No. 533, Ground Floor, part of Property No. 530-535, Ward No. XIV, Gali Bajajan, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006 known as Darvesh Building (hereinafter referred to as ‘suit property’) shown in red colour in the site plan. 2. The case of the plaintiffs in brief is that plaintiffs had purchased property no. 533, situated out of Property No. 530-535, Ward No. XIV, Gali Bajajan, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006 known as Darvesh Building from its previous owner vide registered Sale Deed dated 28.07.2022 and defendant is a tenant in the suit property. It is stated that defendant had not paid the rent despite service of legal notice dated 20.09.2022 and thereafter, another legal notice dated 23.12.2023 was issued by the plaintiffs upon the defendant. It is submitted that upon receipt of such legal notice, defendant instead of complying with such notice has CS SCJ No. 198/24 Sachin Aggarwal & Ors. Vs. Pahu Mal pg. no. 2/5 -- 2 of 5 -- started contemplating to create third party interest in the suit property by sub-letting, alienating, transferring and parting with possession of the suit property to some criminal persons in order to deprive the plaintiffs from getting their legitimate right to receive rent from the defendant. It is contended that on 10.01.2024, plaintiff no.5 visited the suit property and found that defendant was negotiating with some unknown person and had agreed to hand over possession of the suit property against huge amount and upon raising objection by plaintiff no.5, defendant threatened to hand over possession of the suit property to the person of his choice. 3. It was argued that the cause of action arose when plaintiffs found that defendant was negotiating handing over possession of suit property to some unknown persons. It is also argued that the court has territorial jurisdiction to try the present suit. It was prayed that the present suit may be decreed. 4. As per order dated 28.09.2024, right of the defendant to file WS was closed and on 04.11.2024, the defendant was proceeded ex-parte. Matter was thereafter fixed for ex-parte plaintiff evidence. 5. To prove the case, plaintiff no.5 was examined as PW1 who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit which is Ex. PW1/1. PW1 has relied upon following documents:- i. Ex. PW-1/A was site plan. ii. Ex. PW-1/B (OSR) was General Power of Attorney. iii. Mark A was Release Deed. iv. Ex. PW1/D (OSR) was copy of Sale Deed dated CS SCJ No. 198/24 Sachin Aggarwal & Ors. Vs. Pahu Mal pg. no. 3/5 -- 3 of 5 -- 27.09.2012. v. Ex. PW1/E (OSR) was copy of Rectification Deed dated 19.07.2013. vi. Ex. PW1/F (OSR) was copy of Sale Deed dated 22.07.2022 duly registered on 28.07.2022. vii. Ex. PW1/G was copy of legal notice dated 23.12.2023. Thereafter, plaintiff's evidence was closed. 6. I have heard the ex-parte arguments on behalf of the plaintiffs and perused the record. 7. Plaintiffs have filed Ex. PW1/F (OSR), Ex. PW1/E (OSR), Ex. PW1/D (OSR) and Mark A in support of their contentions that they are the owners of the suit property. Perusal of such documents reveal that plaintiffs are the owner of the suit property. Further, as per Sale Deed Ex. PW1/F (OSR), defendant was a tenant of the plaintiffs in the suit property at the time of its purchase and it is the case of the plaintiffs that defendant is still a tenant in the suit property. Plaintiffs in the present case have claimed that defendant be restrained from sub-letting, alienating, transferring and parting with/handing over possession, thereby creating third party interest in respect of Shop No. 533, Ground Floor, part of Property No. 530-535, Ward No. XIV, Gali Bajajan, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006 known as Darvesh Building, however, as per legal notice Ex. PW1/G, defendant has already sublet the suit property as it has been clearly mentioned in Ex. PW1/G dated 23.12.2023 that defendant had illegally and unlawfully sublet the tenanted premises to a sub-tenant and was getting Rs.25,000/- per month as rent from the sub-tenant. CS SCJ No. 198/24 Sachin Aggarwal & Ors. Vs. Pahu Mal pg. no. 4/5 -- 4 of 5 -- Therefore, it is seen that suit property had already been sublet at the time of institution of the suit and defendant was no more in actual physical possession of the suit property and thus, the present suit was infructuous when it was filed as the property had already been sublet. In view of such discussion, it is held that the present suit was infructuous at the time of its filing and relief as prayed by the plaintiffs cannot be allowed. 8. In view of above discussion, the suit of the plaintiffs is dismissed. No order as to costs. 9. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. Announced in the court on 22.05.2025. (Kapil Gupta) Civil Judge-06/Central/Delhi 22.05.2025 CS SCJ No. 198/24 Sachin Aggarwal & Ors. Vs. Pahu Mal pg. no. 5/5 -- 5 of 5 --
