Skip to main content
RC ARC - RENT CONTROLlER/ADDL. R.C.

Geeta SharmaVsUttam Tikadar

CNR DLCT030003752025477-CCJ cum Addl. Rent Controller
Tis Hazari, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
27/2025
Registration Date
20 Jan 2025
Next Hearing Date
23 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Arguments

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Geeta Sharma

    Respondent

    1. 1Uttam Tikadar

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 · Sec 14(1)(e)

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 20-01-2025
Business: PF/RC
Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2025

Date: 01-04-2025
Business: ARG
Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 07-07-2025

Date: 07-07-2025
Business: PURPOSE FIXED
Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2025

Date: 06-10-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 02-02-2026

Date: 02-02-2026
Business: ARG
Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2026

Date: 28-04-2026
Business: ARG
Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2026

Date: 10-08-2026
Business: F.P.
Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 23-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 375/2025
Filing Date: 18-01-2025
eFiling Number: ADL20240007228C202500001
eFiling Date: 17-01-2025
First Hearing Date: 20th January 2025
Court Number And Judge: 477-CCJ cum Addl. Rent Controller

    Orders

    12
    Interim Order 6
    10 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 RC ARC 27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
10.08.2026
Present: Ms. Isha Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner through
VC.
Mr. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent through
VC.
Mr. Nikhil Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
Reply not filed by either of the parties to the application u/o 1
Rule 10 CPC. Right to file the reply stands closed.
Adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to
lead arguments on the ground that the file records are not traceable.
Allowed for today.
Re-list on 23.11.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/10.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 5
    28 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 RC ARC 27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
28.04.2026
VC facility is not working.
Present: Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Durgesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent along-
with respondent.
Mr. Nikhil Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
Copy of application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC supplied to the Ld.
Counsel for the petitioner from extra set available on record.
Reply, if any, to be filed within 30 days with advance copy to
the opposite party.
Put up for arguments on the application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC
for 10.08.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/28.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    02 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 RC ARC 27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
02.02.2026
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the respondent.
None for the applicant in the application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC.
An application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC has been filed on behalf of
the applicant namely Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma.
An extra copy is available on record. The same has been
supplied to Ld. Proxy Counsel for the respondent.
The applicant is further directed to supply a copy to the
petitioner.
Reply, if any, to be filed within 30 days with advance copy to
the opposite party.
Put up for arguments on the application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC
for 28.04.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/02.02.2026
At 12.30 PM
At this stage, Mr. Nikhil Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the
applicant has appeared in the Court and he has been apprised about the
Court proceedings and next date of hearing.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    07 Jul 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18RC ARC27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
07.07.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner through VC.
Mr. Durgesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Application for leave to defend filed on 16.04.2025. Ld.
Counsel for the respondent submits that the same has been e-filed on
15.04.2025. Copy of the same is stated to have been received.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish
to file any replication to the leave to defend application.
Adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for the respondent
seeking some more time to address arguments on leave to defend
application.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application on
06.10.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/07.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    01 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15RC ARC27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
01.04.2025
Present: Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Durgesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent along-
with respondent.
Summons issued to the respondent received back unserved
with the report of refusal by the sister of the respondent.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the respondent has appeared
and has filed vakalatnama. The same is taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent
has not received copy of the petition and has only received the summons
from a neighbour.
At request, copy of petition supplied to Ld. Counsel for the
respondent today.
As Ld. Counsel for the respondent has appeared today and
has filed vakaltnama, no fresh summons is required to be issued upon
respondent.
Put up for filing of leave to defend application within 15
days with advance copy to the opposite party for 07.07.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/01.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    20 Jan 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 27/2025
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
CNR No. DLCT03-000375-2025
20.01.2025
Fresh eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of
the DRC Act received by way of assignment. Let it be checked and
registered.
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Physical file received.
Heard.
Summons be issued upon the respondent as per Section 25-
B (2) of DRC Act, on filing of PF & RC within 07 working days
returnable for 01.04.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/20.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 6
    10 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 RC ARC 27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
10.08.2026
Present: Ms. Isha Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner through
VC.
Mr. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent through
VC.
Mr. Nikhil Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
Reply not filed by either of the parties to the application u/o 1
Rule 10 CPC. Right to file the reply stands closed.
Adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to
lead arguments on the ground that the file records are not traceable.
Allowed for today.
Re-list on 23.11.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/10.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    28 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 RC ARC 27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
28.04.2026
VC facility is not working.
Present: Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Durgesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent along-
with respondent.
Mr. Nikhil Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
Copy of application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC supplied to the Ld.
Counsel for the petitioner from extra set available on record.
Reply, if any, to be filed within 30 days with advance copy to
the opposite party.
Put up for arguments on the application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC
for 10.08.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/28.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    02 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 RC ARC 27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
02.02.2026
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the respondent.
None for the applicant in the application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC.
An application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC has been filed on behalf of
the applicant namely Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma.
An extra copy is available on record. The same has been
supplied to Ld. Proxy Counsel for the respondent.
The applicant is further directed to supply a copy to the
petitioner.
Reply, if any, to be filed within 30 days with advance copy to
the opposite party.
Put up for arguments on the application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC
for 28.04.2026.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/02.02.2026
At 12.30 PM
At this stage, Mr. Nikhil Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the
applicant has appeared in the Court and he has been apprised about the
Court proceedings and next date of hearing.
(Devanshu Sajlan)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    07 Jul 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18RC ARC27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
07.07.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner through VC.
Mr. Durgesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Application for leave to defend filed on 16.04.2025. Ld.
Counsel for the respondent submits that the same has been e-filed on
15.04.2025. Copy of the same is stated to have been received.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish
to file any replication to the leave to defend application.
Adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for the respondent
seeking some more time to address arguments on leave to defend
application.
Put up for arguments on leave to defend application on
06.10.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/07.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    01 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15RC ARC27/25
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
01.04.2025
Present: Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Durgesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent along-
with respondent.
Summons issued to the respondent received back unserved
with the report of refusal by the sister of the respondent.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the respondent has appeared
and has filed vakalatnama. The same is taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent
has not received copy of the petition and has only received the summons
from a neighbour.
At request, copy of petition supplied to Ld. Counsel for the
respondent today.
As Ld. Counsel for the respondent has appeared today and
has filed vakaltnama, no fresh summons is required to be issued upon
respondent.
Put up for filing of leave to defend application within 15
days with advance copy to the opposite party for 07.07.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/01.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    20 Jan 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 27/2025
Geeta Sharma Vs. Uttam Tikadar
CNR No. DLCT03-000375-2025
20.01.2025
Fresh eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of
the DRC Act received by way of assignment. Let it be checked and
registered.
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Physical file received.
Heard.
Summons be issued upon the respondent as per Section 25-
B (2) of DRC Act, on filing of PF & RC within 07 working days
returnable for 01.04.2025.
(Rahul Verma)
CCJ-cum-ARC (Central)
THC/Delhi/20.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.