Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 6

CNR DLCT02106162202418 Apr 2026
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 6 · 18 Apr 2026 · CNR DLCT021061622024

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 35CC NI ACT/14008/2024
DLCT021061622024
Mukesh Kumar Khoka Vs. Ranjeet Bharti
18.04.2026
Present : Sh. Yogesh Bhardwaj, Ld. Counsel for the complainant
alongwith complainant.
Sh.Kaushal Kishore Bharti, Ld. Counsel for the
proposed accused alongwith proposed accused.
These are two connected matters.
Ld. Counsel for the proposed accused submits that the present
application has been filed without mentioning the relevant section number.
He further submits that the amendment sought by the complainant is not
clerical in nature but alters the nature of the case and therefore, the
amendment sought by the complainant ought not to be allowed. Lastly, he
submits that the legal demand notice stands invalidated owing to the
demand of Rs.8,30,000/- as per para no.2 and 3 but the different demand is
made in the prayer clause of the legal demand notice.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant submits that the amendment
sought is clerical in nature as stated in para no.4 of the application. He
further submits that para no. 2 and 3 does not relate to the demand from the
accused but is the total outstanding pending against the accused and his
prayer clause be relied in this regard. In support, Judgment tiled S.R.
Sukumar Vs. S.Sunaad Raghuram SC relied, seen and returned back.
Accused is granted the liberty to file citation, if any, with
advanced copy to the opposite side.
List for the orders on 30.05.2026 at 02.00 PM.
(Ravisha Sidana)
JMFC, NI Act-06,
Central District, THC
18.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.