Full Order Text
Order 4 · 09 Dec 2025 · CNR DLCT021060952024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 21 CC NI ACT / 13738/2024 M/s LMC Enterprises Pvt Ltd Vs. Ms Geeta Mishra /0 (Kashmere Gate) 09.12.2025 Present: Mr S S Tripathi, Ld counsel for the complainant. Proposed accused through VC (9130315551) Mr Yati Ranjan, Ld counsel for the proposed accused through VC. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Court notice issued to proposed accused not received back. In the light of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 952”, there shall be no requirement to issue summons to the accused in terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the pre-cognizance stage. Hence, appearance of proposed accused is hereby dispensed with. Accordingly, arguments heard on point of summoning. Following the law laid down in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2014) 11 SCC 790 and in view of complaint; documents produced with respect to return of cheque on dishonourment and service of legal demand notice; and verification in the form of affidavit of evidence, there are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused for offence punishable under Section 138 NI Act. Since the accused has entered her appearance, therefore, her formal summoning is hereby dispensed with. Accused is directed to appear in person on the NDOH. Copy of the complainant be supplied to the accused before the NDOH. Put up for appearance of accused, grant of bail and framing of notice on 07.04.2026. (Navdeep Gupta) JMFC (NI Act-02)/Central THC/Delhi/09.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --