Order 6

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 36 CC NI ACT 13356/2024
Garg Home Furnishing Vs. M/s Jai Enterprises
24.09.2026
Today, lawyers are stated to be abstaining from work.
Present: Complainant in person.
None for accused.
Matter is at the stage of appearance of accused.
On LDOH, accused was arrested on execution of NBWs and was
released on bail. However, still the accused has failed to appear.
Surety bonds of Rs. 20,000/- have not been furnished despite
directions. Today also, he has failed to appear. Accordingly, a cost Rs. 1,000/- is
imposed on the accused side to be paid to NGO “AB SEVA FOUNDATION
SANSTHAN” on the UPI no. 8529243603. Receipt of same be filed by NDOH.
PAYMENT OF COST IS PRE REQUISITE.
Accused has failed to comply with the directions of the court. Conduct
of the accused is not praiseworthy. It is apparent that despite being arrested and
being released thereafter, accused is willfully disobeying the court’s directions. He
has not appeared today and failed to furnish surety as well.
Accordingly, court is constrained to issue coercive process.
Let BWs in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-, be issued against the accused on
the address furnished on 14.05.2026, with one surety of like amount through the
concerned DCP returnable on NDOH, on filing of PF within two months. DCP
concerned is directed to ensure atleast three visits/ attempts are made to execute the
process and proper report be filed.
Copy of this order be sent to DCP concerned to ensure compliance.
Warrants should carry an endorsement that accused is at liberty to
settle the matter and pay the amount to the complainant by reaching out the
complainant side, in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India, in case titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., 2025 (SC)
.
Put up for appearance of accused/ framing of notice/ furnishing of
surety/ further proceedings on 14.07.2027.
(URVI GUPTA)
J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/24.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --