Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 3

CNR DLCT02105161202428 Nov 2025
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 3 · 28 Nov 2025 · CNR DLCT021051612024

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 34CC NI ACT/13682/2024
CNR NO.:-DLCT021051612024
Vikas Nagpal Vs. Giriraj Prasad Aggarwal
28.11.2025
Present : Complainant in person.
Proposed accused through VC.
Complainant submits that no payment has been
received from proposed accused and prays that the matter be
proceeded with.
An opportunity was granted to proposed accused under
Section 223 BNSS to which he stated that he shall pay the cheque
amount by March, 2026.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported as
A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790 has
held as under,
“29. From a conjoint reading of Sections 138, 142 and 145 of the N.I. Act as
well as Section 200 of the Code, it is clear that it is open to the Magistrate to
issue process on the basis of the contents of the complaint, documents in
support thereof and the affidavit submitted by the complainant in support of the
complaint….
…33.4 In the light of Section 145 of the NI Act, it is open to the Magistrate to
rely upon the verification in the form of affidavit filed by the complainant in
support of the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act and the Magistrate is
neither mandatorily obliged to call upon the complainant to remain present
before the Court, nor to examine the complainant or his witness upon oath for
taking the decision whether or not to issue process on the complaint under
Section 138 of the NI Act.”
Similar directions have been issued in Indian Bank
Association & Ors. vs. Union of India (2014) 5 SCC 590 and Rajesh
Agarwal vs. State (2010) 171 DLT 51.
-- 1 of 2 --
On consideration of the complaint, annexed documents
and the verification affidavit of the complainant, this Court is of the
opinion that prima facie there are sufficient grounds for proceeding
against the accused mentioned, I hereby take cognizance of the
offence under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. There
is no requirement for examination of the complainant or witnesses
for purpose of issuance of process in view of the above-mentioned
directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court and Hon’ble Delhi High
Court. In terms of inquiry conducted under Section 202 CrPC, all
the statutory requirements have been complied with. The complaint
is filed within the period of limitation as prescribed under Section
142(1)(b) of the NI Act.
Since, the accused has entered appearance, summons
are dispensed with.
Complainant submits that he has already supplied copy
of hard copy of complaint and annexed documents to the accused on
09.09.2025 as well as by post.
Since the offence is bailable, accused is admitted to bail
subject to furnishing of bail bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- and one
surety in the like amount. Personal bonds filed and accepted till
NDOH. Time sought for filing surety bonds. Time granted till
NDOH.
Re-list the matter for framing of notice/ furnishing of
bail bonds on 09.02.2026 for further proceedings.
(Ravisha Sidana)
JMFC, NI Act-06,
Central District, THC
28.11.2025
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.