Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 2

CNR DLCT02052032202506 Dec 2025
Tis Hazari, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 2 · 06 Dec 2025 · CNR DLCT020520322025

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 28
Cr. Case 15628/2025 STATE Vs. AJAY 59/2024 (Railway Sarai Rohilla)
06.12.2025
Present: Sh. Vinod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Accused in person.
Arguments on the point of notice heard.
From the material available on record, prima facie offence under
section 4(c) DPT & MATO Act 2010 is made out against the accused. Separate
notice u/s 4(c) DPT & MATO Act 2010 framed upon the accused. Accused pleaded
not guilty and claims trial.
An application alongwith affidavit for plea-bargaining has been filed.
Put up for consideration before pre-sitting Lok Adalat at 04:00 p.m.
(Vaibhav Garg)
JMFC-11/Central/THC
06.12.2025
At 4:00 pm
PRE-SITTING LOK ADALAT
Present : Sh. Vinod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Accused in person alongwith Ld. Counsel.
IO in person.
Accused has filed an application seeking Plea-bargaining along with
the requisite affidavit. As per previous conviction report of the accused, he is not
previously convicted for the same or similar offence.
Ld. APP accepts the notice on behalf of State. Heard. Record perused.
Let the accused be examined in Camera.
After examining the accused, this court is satisfied that the application
for Plea-Bargaining has been filed by accused voluntarily and without any undue
pressure or coercion.
Contd…..
-- 1 of 2 --
Accused, Ld. APP for State and IO after having meeting to enter a
mutually satisfactory disposition of the case have reported to the Court that a
mutually satisfactory disposition of the case has been worked out between the
parties, wherein accused voluntarily agrees to plead guilty for offence u/S 4(c) DPT
& MATO Act 2010 and Ld. APP for State & IO have raised no objection for the
same and that the accused has agreed that he shall not repeat the offence in future
and that the accused shall undergo the punishment as will be imposed by the court.
(Accused) (APP for State) (IO)
Separate statements of the accused have been recorded which are
annexed with this order.
Court has heard the mutual satisfactory disposition of case worked out
by the parties, the process of which has been completed voluntarily by the parties.
Court is satisfied that there is no impediment to dispose of the present case through
plea-bargaining.
In view of the mutual satisfactory disposal of the case upon the
application moved on behalf of accused for plea-bargaining, accused stands
convicted for the offence punishable u/S 4(c) DPT & MATO Act 2010.
Submissions on the point of sentence heard.
In the facts and circumstance of the present case, the accused is
admonished as per the provisions of Section 3 of Probation of Offenders Act.
Let the file be put up before Lok Adalat for disposal on 10.01.2026.
(Vaibhav Garg )
Judge Lok Adalat Pre-Sitting
Delhi/06.12.2025
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.