Full Order Text
Order 2 · 18 Feb 2026 · CNR DLCT020494972025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 42 CC NI ACT / 16659/2025 Indusind Bank Vs. Amit /0 (Karol Bagh) 18.02.2026 Present: Ms. Leena, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In terms of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in ‘Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.’, pronounced on 25.09.2025, in Criminal Appeal No.1755/2010, requirement for issuing notice u/s 223 BNSS to proposed accused stands dispensed with. Arguments on point of summoning have been heard. File has been perused. All the statutory requirements under NI Act are complied with. The present complaint case is filed within period of limitation. On examination of documents filed along with the present complaint, the Court is satisfied that prima facie offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act is made out against the accused. Hence, I take cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 138 N.I. Act, 1881. Issue summons to the accused on filing of PF, RC and speed post as well as by electronic mode details (WhatsAPP and E-mail). Summons may be served by way of affixation in case the premises of the accused are found locked or if the summons could not be served personally or upon a adult family member. Steps be taken within two weeks. Complainant is directed to supply the complete set of documents filed in the court including the pre-summoning evidence affidavit of complainant. Ahlmad is directed to issue the summons only after ensuring that the same has been done. Ahlmad is directed to make the endorsement on the summons in terms of the guidelines of Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in ‘Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H. [(2010) 5 SCC 663]’. Ahlmad is directed to mention the official e-mail ID and VC Link of this Court on the summons. Put up for appearance of the accused and further proceedings on 12.08.2026. (ARJUN KIRAR) JMFC (NI Act)- 05/ Central District THC/Delhi/18.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --