Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 23 CC NI ACT 17532/2025
Indostar Capital Finance Limited Vs. Karuppannan Elumalai
09.10.2026
Present: Sh. Siddharth Maheswhari and Ms. Manika Sharma, Ld. Proxy
counsels for complainant.
None for accused.
Summons could not be issued due to non filing of PF.
One more opportunity is granted to the complainant to take steps for
issuance of summons against the accused on filing PF.
In the meantime, let fresh summons be issued against the accused on
filing of PF within two months, through all modes, returnable for NDOH.
Complainant is directed to file proof of service.
Complainant is directed to supply the soft copy of complaint and
documents to the accused well in time.
In case of online service, complainant is directed to file requisite
affidavit with contact details of the accused and certificate U/s 63 BSA to show due
service through online mode.
Summons should carry an endorsement that accused is at liberty to
settle the matter and pay the amount to the complainant by reaching out the
complainant side on the no. 8882531888, in view of the judgment passed by
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in case titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S.
Borcar & Anr., 2025 (SC)
.
Put up for appearance of accused/ framing of notice/ furnishing of
surety/ further proceedings on 17.09.2027.
(URVI GUPTA)
J.M.F.C.-01(N.I.Act)/Central,
THC/Delhi/09.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --